I'm also thinking that the US should set up a Presidential Apprentice challenge at each election. (it might happen if Trump becomes President)
Week 1: One candidate is sent to Iraq and the other to Syria and each has to sort out ISIS in less than a week. Double points for not being blown away by terrorists or bombed by the Russians.
Week 2: Each candidate is given a house and has to build a garden wall and get the neighbour to pay for it.
Week 3: Each candidate must get the most donations for their favourite Foundation in two days. At the end each must sell a speech at a charity dinner for the highest amount.
Week 4: Each candidate must run a casino and manage not to get bankrupt by the end of one week. If they do get bankrupt, they may be recalled at the end if they manage to offset their losses not to pay taxes until week 9.
Week 5: The candidate with the largest number of emails published in the press wins. Double points if they get the Russians to hack their email account.
Week 6: The candidate with the largest number and the most likes on 2-6 am tweets wins.
Week 7: The candidate that manages to stay the longest behind the other on camera during a debate wins.
Week 8: The candidates organise and host a beauty pageant. The one that manages not to upset the contestants wins.
Week 9: Each candidate presents a CV, a policy plan and is interviewed by Michelle Obama. I pity them.
Week 10 and final: Each candidate organises a rally. They will be scored on organization, soundbites, number of groups they manage to insult and how many hats they sell.
In the end, a small group of invisible people, who've been running the whole show but that nobody knows who they are but that everybody knows they exist, will decide who wins.