Thank you @heyhohello and @Kdtym10 for keeping the thread alive.
I think it's also important to have faith Christ will lead me. The parable of the lost sheep and the lost coins comes to mind. Being brutally honest I don't currently wholly understand all of the book of Revelation. But I know Christ does so aim to abide in Him and hopefully grow in understanding in the fullness of time.
I agree* *@heyhohello and like I said before, you don't need to understand all of it, just like we don't need to know whether Jesus was a Carpenter, Stonemason or handy man. Just keep your eyes and ears open, listen to the Holy Spirit, keep reading Jesus' words and you can't go far wrong.
Thing is, all of this 'end of days' stuff is incredibly human-centric. Even if we are stupid enough to blow up our world soon (and we might be) then something will survive and flourish in time. It just won't be us. No big deal. We aren't the summit of everything.
Without wishing to further depress anybody @pointythings the end of the world won’t be brought about by humans alone. The destruction described in the Bible will be even greater than that of an extinction level event (such as happened to the dinosaurs):
“* *But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.” (2 Peter 3:10).
Don't believe in Heaven or Hell. From dust to dust for me.
@fleurneige I’m guessing from that statement you don’t believe in the existence of the soul?
Another world war would more than likely be nuclear. No amount of religion would save anyone or anything. No one will go to heaven or hell - we’ll all end up as a pile of ash!
@Parker231 See above, this will be on a far larger scale. The physical would be turned to ash, but the spiritual cannot be destroyed in such a way.
In common with most doomsday prophecies, it has a way of tapping into our darkest fears, and I think it’s these we need to pay attention to, not whether Putin is the Antichrist or whether Elon Musk’s name adds up to 666 in Sanskrit or Hebrew or ancient Greek.
@BreakfastAtMilliways I really don’t think that’s the message John was trying to get across in Revelation. However, Elon Musk is a far better candidate for the Antichrist than Putin or Emperor Nero. The Bible reveals, whoever he is, this man is going to come up with some creative and innovative solutions to the world’s problems and bring about peace in the middle east (for a time). Then there's Neuralink...
@Kdtym10
Gematria aside, I’ve explained my thoughts about why Nero couldn’t possibly be the Antichrist and at this point, we’ll have to agree to disagree.
What is meant by “ye are gods”? Well precisely that
So, everyone is a god (little g) in their own right? Do you believe there is also a supreme being who created everything, a God (big G)?
I noticed upthread you said we should all aspire to become Christ, which I agreed with, but misread the subtle difference. I meant that we should aspire to be Christ like - the former is impossible.
what is meant by the kingdom of god is within you. The type of Jewish mysticism of which Paul was a likely initiate and therefore most likely influenced his disciple Luke involved a journey within youre self to find and see the Chariot Throne of Eziekiel fame. - it’s the journey of the imagination as later prophets would discuss.
Paul being a Jewish Mystic, how you see it, seems rather far-fetched. I’m not aware of any later prophets mentioning a ‘journey of imagination’, could you explain this further please?
Do you also believe in the concept of double presdestination?
No, I believe that Salvation is available to all.
Well we don’t normally see angels (although they make appearances through the bible), they are due to appear at the end of times with the breaking of the seals (also a concept from contemporary Jewish mysticism), where are they??
That’s what I meant by saying we can see angels occasionally, when God permits them to appear, but the events of Revelation (such as the blowing of trumpets) are happening in the spiritual realm, which we cannot normally perceive.
Well if we have something “far better than the written word” why bother with scripture?
Because Scripture, as @heyhohello explained upthread, is not just 'the written word'. Hebrews 4:12 says, "For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."
Besides, Jesus said Himself, in John 14, that it was better to have the Holy Spirit on earth than His physical presence here:
“If you love me, keep my commands. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another advocate to help you and be with you forever - the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you. Whoever has my commands and keeps them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love them and show myself to them...You heard me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I. I have told you now before it happens, so that when it does happen you will believe.”
And yes the early church had beliefs re reincarnation- what I’m saying about Mark is you can re read it, it ends with the message he will see the disciples in Galaliee, which he does if you re read the book.
Sorry, I still don't get it. The gospel of Mark ends with Jesus appearing to his disciples in Jerusalem, not Galilee, and His ascension into Heaven. Nothing at all pertaining to reincarnation.
was Jesus born? Well let’s look at the first time we meet Jesus - his immersion in water. If you look at Plato (and picked up later by the neo platonists). Being born into this word was connected with the concept of water, dew, rivers and fountains. And look where Mark starts, look at when God announces Jesus as his son. It’s pure Platonism.
I don't see anything unusually about Mark opening his account with the beginning of Jesus' adult ministry. What do you think of the Nativity? Were the other gospel writers mistaken? Are you suggesting they were influenced by the work of Plato?