Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

What's harder? None to 1, 1-2 or 2-3?

56 replies

tryingtobemarypoppins · 18/07/2009 11:01

babies I mean! Not ages!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
gembobs · 21/07/2009 00:41

I have defo found 1-2 the hardest, trying 2 juggle 2 is very hard, mind u my youngest is only 7 weeks old so hoping it will get easier as time goes on.

ButterbeerAndLemon · 21/07/2009 01:06

0-1 hard
1-2 fine, not so tough for me (and DD was a very easy baby compared to DS) but came as a bit of a shock to DH...

Haven't tried 2-3 but everyone who has seems to warn us off having three...

scrummymum · 21/07/2009 08:25

0-1 Was wonderful. DD was a very easy,sleepy baby so apart from 1st time mum wobbles, it was fab.

1-2 Worse than 0-1 but only as DS is not as laid back as DD.

2-3 We are trying to decide at the minute about 3 but I think the 3rd will just slot in.

It obviously depends what type of babies they are and age gaps (there is a 3.5 gap between mine) and babies are always more work than older children so by the time a 3rd comes along the 2nd is more independant. This might just be wishful thinking though.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Knickers0nMaHead · 24/07/2009 14:40

1-2 esp with a small gap.

Knickers0nMaHead · 24/07/2009 14:40

1-2 esp with a small gap.

francagoestohollywood · 24/07/2009 14:47

0 - 1 was the hardest for me.
1 - 2 was tiring at times, but not too bad.
Have no personal experience of 2-3 though!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page