Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Rush to diagnose ADHD and autism can damage children: As rates soar up to 40-fold, a major review warns of the toll on those wrongly given a label

279 replies

Rubydobydo · 09/10/2026 09:04

Britain risks harming a generation of children by over-diagnosing ADHD and autism, a major review warns today.
Parents are incentivised to have their children diagnosed by misguided schools and welfare systems that reward such 'labels', the report found.
Youngsters have also been influenced by social media posts that wrongly present common traits as evidence of the conditions.
https://www.dailymail.com/health/article-16194777/Rush-diagnose-ADHD-autism-damage-children.html

Discuss?

ADHD - News and Updates on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Daily Mail Online

Get the latest news and updates on ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder - from Mail Online.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/adhd/index.html

OP posts:
Monty36 · 09/10/2026 15:31

The Government are also concerned about the fast rate of private diagnosis which is happening, and not all by reputable organisations.

Monty36 · 09/10/2026 15:36

ElanaohElana · 09/10/2026 15:15

Do we? I think we need young adults who are happy and able to work to pay for the huge crop of pensioners we have coming up. Currently our birth rate is nowhere near enough, so we will need to have higher immigration. We also have too many depressed teens. It’s in everyone’s interests to make school and work enjoyable and productive. There really is no need for it all to be such a slog.

Yes we do. We are one of the most densely populated countries in Europe.
Following the logic of ‘we need more people for pensions’, if those people arrive, you will in turn need ever more people. It becomes mad.

What we do need are fewer people.

OriginalUsername2 · 09/10/2026 15:51

It’s psychiatrists and psychologists that are making these final diagnoses. Why are the general public (schools, parents..) being made out to be the problem? Round up these healthcare professionals and have a proper enquiry.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

RlastR · 09/10/2026 15:54

PocketSand · 09/10/2026 14:33

Also I am confused about the argument that a diagnosis is required to get ‘support’. A diagnosis is needed in some circumstances eg to receive ADHD meds but even referral to autism outreach does not require an official diagnosis (unlawful LA policy that can be challenged) and referral to EP, SALT, OT and application for EHCP are based on need not diagnosis. Obviously if an unlawful policy of schools/LAs is resulting in increased pressure to seek diagnosis this should be stopped.

Until recently I worked in a service where we saw young adults presenting with particular sets of difficulties. They didn’t need a diagnosis to be referred, it was purely on their presentation and difficulties. Many of them were neurodiverse even if not diagnosed.
And referrals have rocketed in number over the past few years so that’s nothing to do “better diagnosis” It’s due to the big increase in young people struggling.

PocketSand · 09/10/2026 16:03

Of course it’s unlawful. If I were a disinterested campaigner I would have spent years fighting this. However, I’m a parent and education years are short with damage caused by delay in those formative years potentially lasting a lifetime. I can understand why parents don’t seek diagnosis or EHCP and send their DC to independent schools or HE. Fighting won’t help your DC or the next generation of DC whose parents can’t afford those options because the goalposts move.

With DS1 I did not shrink from a battle. Tribunal for specialist provision. JR with the help of SOS!SEN when it failed for 5 home tutors, SALT, OT, specialist counselling on a weekly basis. We ‘won’. But DS1 is now 25 and has severe anxiety associated with autism and agoraphobic. Maybe this was how it was always going to end given his profile. Maybe the lack of early intervention was key. I will never know.

I provide all care currently despite an adult social care assessment confirming eligibility for external support. This is also no doubt unlawful. But DS1 is unable to speak to anyone but me and his brother. He locks himself in his room if tradies visit or postie rings the doorbell etc.

Maybe I am scarred from previous experience but I have done everything to avoid DS2 ending up in the same situation even if this has meant not fighting for his and my rights when the outcome may have been detrimental.

We can only do our best.

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 09/10/2026 16:09

SuffolkBargeWoman · 09/10/2026 10:08

Blaming the issue on more children having their medical conditions diagnosed is absurd. Refusing them diagnosis will just mean they suffer in silence with no idea why they are struggling, like we used to in the ‘80s and ‘90s. Should we stop diagnosing people with dementia or epilepsy or other neurological conditions and assume that will make their effects go away? It’s a preposterous proposal, isn’t it?

@4DCheckmate is spot on.

I agree with the last part of your reply, especially with regards to the lack of recognition for common (and less common) neurological conditions. I've got a neurological involuntary movement disorder called tardive dyskinesia that was only diagnosed by the fourth neurologist that I saw privately. The previous three had certainly gaslighted me, even after many months of fairly textbook obvious symptoms that I had figured out through self diagnosis.

Having said this, I do partly agree with the OP, but only because of how I feel perhaps sometimes people may (reasonably) define themselves by it, to the point whereby it becomes them and who they are, but nothing else. Obviously anyone who is neurodivergent should be recognised as such, but I'm of the view that often living fully in spite of a diagnosis is not a bad thing. I'm still me, and still the person who I was before my neurological disorder.

(I'm pretty sure I also have ADHD traits too, although I don't think a diagnosis would help me personally as it does impact my life up to a point, but I couldn't take the ADHD medication as it'd exacerbate my movement disorder...!)

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 09/10/2026 16:12

ohfook · 09/10/2026 12:38

I’m don’t think this is just anecdotal. I’m sure I read a report that said exactly this about premature babies. Obviously this is a positive because far far more babies are now surviving a premature birth.

I’m not sure how accurate this is but I’ve also been told that there is a high link between being born prematurely and the chances of having autism. I’m sure someone has recently looked into the correlation between trauma in-utero and autism too.

I was born three months prematurely and was weaned off heroin, and yes, I'm fairly certain it affected my brain chemistry. I've never been diagnosed with ADHD but I could tick off many of the traits.

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 16:21

PocketSand · 09/10/2026 16:03

Of course it’s unlawful. If I were a disinterested campaigner I would have spent years fighting this. However, I’m a parent and education years are short with damage caused by delay in those formative years potentially lasting a lifetime. I can understand why parents don’t seek diagnosis or EHCP and send their DC to independent schools or HE. Fighting won’t help your DC or the next generation of DC whose parents can’t afford those options because the goalposts move.

With DS1 I did not shrink from a battle. Tribunal for specialist provision. JR with the help of SOS!SEN when it failed for 5 home tutors, SALT, OT, specialist counselling on a weekly basis. We ‘won’. But DS1 is now 25 and has severe anxiety associated with autism and agoraphobic. Maybe this was how it was always going to end given his profile. Maybe the lack of early intervention was key. I will never know.

I provide all care currently despite an adult social care assessment confirming eligibility for external support. This is also no doubt unlawful. But DS1 is unable to speak to anyone but me and his brother. He locks himself in his room if tradies visit or postie rings the doorbell etc.

Maybe I am scarred from previous experience but I have done everything to avoid DS2 ending up in the same situation even if this has meant not fighting for his and my rights when the outcome may have been detrimental.

We can only do our best.

If this is in response to my post I think you have read more into it than was intended. I was only pointing out to others that LAs cannot compel parents to facilities the provision like that because not everyone realises that. You might have known that and chosen not to force the LA’s hand in relation to that specific point, which was, of course, your prerogative, but not all parents realise the LA is responsible or that they absolutely can successfully challenge LAs expecting this and it doesn’t require allowing DC to fall apart while they challenge the LA. I certainly didn’t comment on how hard you tried!

I’m not sure what you mean by fighting won’t help your DC. Fighting absolutely does help DC. My DC have the support they have because I have advocated and enforced their legal rights every step of the way. The support secured absolutely helps them. If I didn’t fight, they wouldn’t have the support they do.

Notonmyland · 09/10/2026 16:31

Shuffletoesxtreme · 09/10/2026 10:46

There's another thread for SEN TAs where teachers are talking about 50% of their students in their mainstream classes having a SEN diagnosis. Yes there have always been undiagnosed neurodiverse kids, but nowhere near at this level, and finding out what's causing it should be the govt's absolute priority.

A cynical person might think that it's because the benefits cap doesn't apply if you have a kid with something.

All kids deserve a good start in life. It's probably time we worked out how to do that. Apparently sure start centres are probably needed to tell parents to not give kids a tablet or phone.

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 16:35

Notonmyland · 09/10/2026 16:31

A cynical person might think that it's because the benefits cap doesn't apply if you have a kid with something.

All kids deserve a good start in life. It's probably time we worked out how to do that. Apparently sure start centres are probably needed to tell parents to not give kids a tablet or phone.

A cynical person or a person who doesn’t actually understand the system? A diagnosis alone does not remove the benefit cap. Equally, receiving a benefit that does remove the benefit cap, such as receiving DLA for DC, doesn’t require a diagnosis.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 16:39

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 16:35

A cynical person or a person who doesn’t actually understand the system? A diagnosis alone does not remove the benefit cap. Equally, receiving a benefit that does remove the benefit cap, such as receiving DLA for DC, doesn’t require a diagnosis.

No but it’s all part of the same machine.

It’s not lost on me that the spike in diagnoses came just after the benefit cap (whereby the only exclusion is disability), it is profitable, I’m sorry but it just is. If you have 2 or 3 kids on DLA, and get UC, you will be ‘earning’ the same as a full time nurse or similar.

There are a LOT of families round here with 2-4 kids on DLA, claiming carers and UC, PIP for themselves, their partner claiming carers for them… they’re absolutely minted. I know it feels daily mail, but it’s true.

PocketSand · 09/10/2026 16:41

@roaringdragon sorry if I didn’t make it clear but I absolutely fought for adequate EHCP provision for DS2 and he wouldn’t have had the support if I hadn’t. However after the heady heights of fighting for support for DS1 I am at fault for normalising this. I can forget that parents don’t fight for what I see as the first step but are willing to be guided by the school/LA until the shit hits the fan. I am sure you are an excellent advocate for your DC and wish you well.

BiteSizeByzantine · 09/10/2026 16:43

Rubydobydo · 09/10/2026 09:04

Britain risks harming a generation of children by over-diagnosing ADHD and autism, a major review warns today.
Parents are incentivised to have their children diagnosed by misguided schools and welfare systems that reward such 'labels', the report found.
Youngsters have also been influenced by social media posts that wrongly present common traits as evidence of the conditions.
https://www.dailymail.com/health/article-16194777/Rush-diagnose-ADHD-autism-damage-children.html

Discuss?

It takes years and years and years to get a diagnosis, what are you on about?

Minasama · 09/10/2026 16:43

4DCheckmate · 09/10/2026 09:24

It’s an idiotic document which confuses correlation with causation. It implies that the rise in young ND people struggling with their mental health is because they are now getting diagnosed, when autistic people themselves almost unanimously describe what a relief diagnosis was for them and how it improved their self-understanding and ability to cope. The report offers zero evidence for the assertion that diagnosis is what is causing poorer mental health and it’s such a wild assertion that it would require strong evidence to support it.

Perhaps the researchers should have considered why so many more children are struggling to cope with being neurodiverse and therefore they/ their parents feel the need to seek a diagnosis and formal support. Why ND children are failed in far greater proportion by the education system and end up with very poor mental health.

There is plentiful, credible (unlike this report) research on this, for example:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37810599/

The vast majority of the children with school trauma, persistent or long term absences (almost 90%) are neurodiverse. 85% are autistic.

There is also robust research showing that appropriate support has a disproportionate positive impact on the outcomes of ND children in comparison to NT children, and that a lack of appropriate support has a disproportionate negative impact on ND children in comparison to NT children, i.e. it is like a magnifying glass. Dandelions can still thrive in hostile conditions, if you stamp on them you damage the flower but it can grow back. Orchids can grow into something incredibly beautiful but only with appropriate care. Without appropriate care they will wither and die. These are the ND children. And yet we have Governments and Local Authorities hell bent on denying ND children the support they require and now even recognition of their difficulties in environments designed for NT children, and then acting surprised when this results in severe mental health problems and/ or the children ending up out of school or work. It’s hardly surprising to anybody who has bothered to read the academic and medical research on the topic and one can, therefore, only assume that these politicians and other useful idiots have not bothered to do so.

This and other research make perfectly clear that it is the school system itself causing the problems for these children. They are being utterly failed and systematically denied access to an education that they can access.

The Government needs to accept that the “one size fits all model” of state education is the precise opposite of inclusive, and will never - with any amount of adjustments or ridiculous “bases” where children with opposite clashing needs are excluded to within the school - be appropriate for these children. The classes are too loud, too busy, and far too large. Then the children have to mask all day which is proved to cause mental health problems and burnout, and they can’t learn to their potential so their self-esteem is trashed on top of and compounding the difficulties they have due to their neurological condition. This is all well evidenced in copious research.

Nothing will improve until the Government sets up sufficient appropriate, separate schools which are need-specific (e.g. currently, many autistic children who are academic and well behaved but have sensory issues so need a calm environment and smaller classes have NO state schools they can attend at all, despite some of them being amongst our brightest and most gifted pupils, because all specialist schools tend to be focused on children wih behaviour problems or learning difficulties. And there aren’t even enough specialist places for the latter). Instead, this idiotic Government is doubling down on trying to remove children getting EHCPs and any way to move, trying to force even more of these children to remain in inappropriate mainstream state schools with chaotic environments and huge classes, and now trying to remove the children even getting a diagnosis so they can develop self-understanding of their strengths and difficulties and learn better coping strategies/ have the correct support for each individual identified by professional medical staff who actually know what they’re talking about, unlike most school SENCOs.

Blaming the issue on more children having their medical conditions diagnosed is absurd. Refusing them diagnosis will just mean they suffer in silence with no idea why they are struggling, like we used to in the ‘80s and ‘90s. Should we stop diagnosing people with dementia or epilepsy or other neurological conditions and assume that will make their effects go away? It’s a preposterous proposal, isn’t it?

Then these idiots try to present these ongoing attempts to make things even worse for these children than they are currently as “helping” them when it’s their own policies that are causing the problem. It’s Kafkaesque.

Edited

Thank you for this informed and insightful comment. I wish there was more research into why rates of both suspected and diagnosed autism and adhd have i creased so much over the past 40 years. It is not simply about awareness I don’t believe. I would love to know what is causing it - or at least any correlations - with things like chemicals in processed foods, waves in the air, pfas, fewer mothers at home with their very young children, hormones, ivf, sweetened drinks… this is just a list of things that are very different from 40 years ago. This must be an area ripe for research…

BiteSizeByzantine · 09/10/2026 16:44

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 16:39

No but it’s all part of the same machine.

It’s not lost on me that the spike in diagnoses came just after the benefit cap (whereby the only exclusion is disability), it is profitable, I’m sorry but it just is. If you have 2 or 3 kids on DLA, and get UC, you will be ‘earning’ the same as a full time nurse or similar.

There are a LOT of families round here with 2-4 kids on DLA, claiming carers and UC, PIP for themselves, their partner claiming carers for them… they’re absolutely minted. I know it feels daily mail, but it’s true.

Do you know how much evidence you need to even get seen?

CatkinToadflax · 09/10/2026 16:47

ohfook · 09/10/2026 12:38

I’m don’t think this is just anecdotal. I’m sure I read a report that said exactly this about premature babies. Obviously this is a positive because far far more babies are now surviving a premature birth.

I’m not sure how accurate this is but I’ve also been told that there is a high link between being born prematurely and the chances of having autism. I’m sure someone has recently looked into the correlation between trauma in-utero and autism too.

Yes this is correct. My DS1 was born on the cusp of viability 21 years ago. Of the 10 extremely premature babies we know from back then, 8 are moderately or severely autistic.

My son is severely affected by his autism, ADHD and various add-ons. He went to a special school and will never live independently. Recently we had a phone assessment for LCWRA because he can’t work. However the assessor clearly made the assumption that he’s a young man who went through mainstream education and likes gaming, but has anxiety and has chosen not to work. He was therefore refused LCWRA. Interestingly, I mentioned this on MNHQ at the time - without giving any details about DS - and a poster who claimed to be an LCWRA assessor reached the same conclusion as the assessor. She asked me why he’d completed his A levels and then decided not to work. She certainly had a vivid imagination because A levels and even mainstream schooling weren’t possible. I guess it goes to show though that numbers of young people in this situation are increasing.

All young people need support, but not the same identical support. We managed to get my son’s LCWRA decision overturned. Others, who are more able, need different types of help.

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 16:50

it’s all part of the same machine

It isn’t. It is factually incorrect that “benefits cap doesn't apply if you have a kid with something” and such misunderstandings feed into wider society having judgemental attitudes towards families with DC with additional needs.

And if that full-time nurse or similar had DC eligible for DLA, they could still receive DLA for them on top of their wages, and many would also still be eligible for UC as well.

I have multiple disabled DC, their disability related expenses far outweigh what we receive in benefits. This is the case for many. Scope’s disability price tag research shows disabled households need an extra £1,095 each month on average to have the same standard of living as non-disabled households. The majority in their research have costs in excess of what they receive in disability benefits.

PocketSand · 09/10/2026 16:50

@Notonmyland@ExtraHotDoubleShot would you like to share your experiences of your struggles relating to your autistic/ADHD DC or how you have personally profited from their disability?

namechangeFeb24 · 09/10/2026 16:55

I haven’t read the article, and don’t plan to. I’m sure it’s full of rubbish, but I have to admit to being a bit jaded by the whole ND diagnosis thing. I have two DC, one with two diagnoses and one with none but I’m certain younger is ND. Eldest is medicated for ADHD and it’s been a big help as the H is huge for him. My younger is likely more ADD or certainly doesn’t have the same hyperactivity levels so easier to manage.

Eldest has no support, didn’t before meds and has never needed it, bar a bit of tolerance from teachers. No EHCP here. My DC know being ND is not an excuse for bad behaviour. There is some APPALLING behaviour in both their classes, likely from ND kids but parenting needs to come into it too. We work with school, it’s a three way relationship and support reasonable consequences for bad behaviour at school. We walk the mile to school and back, rain or shine. My DC do 5 hours of sport each a week. They go to bed early. They have limited screens. They misbehave (happens a lot!) they lose their privileges/screens. My youngest has a maths tutor. My husband and I are 100% both ND, we are healthy, fit, hard working full time high earners. My DPs were the same. My SIL is also ND and the opposite to DH - very unhealthy, unemployed, on benefits, lives in a pit of self pity. Some things can’t be helped, but for the high functioning ND among us, we can and should be helping ourselves. So those who really need the help, can access it.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 17:12

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 16:50

it’s all part of the same machine

It isn’t. It is factually incorrect that “benefits cap doesn't apply if you have a kid with something” and such misunderstandings feed into wider society having judgemental attitudes towards families with DC with additional needs.

And if that full-time nurse or similar had DC eligible for DLA, they could still receive DLA for them on top of their wages, and many would also still be eligible for UC as well.

I have multiple disabled DC, their disability related expenses far outweigh what we receive in benefits. This is the case for many. Scope’s disability price tag research shows disabled households need an extra £1,095 each month on average to have the same standard of living as non-disabled households. The majority in their research have costs in excess of what they receive in disability benefits.

But you have just proved what I said.

In the 90s it would be very rare to have more than one disabled child.

Somehow it’s become normal for all of a person’s children to be disabled.

How is this happening?

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 17:20

No, I didn’t prove what you said.

Firstly, my DC’s additional needs aren’t anything to do with the benefit cap. DH and I don’t claim UC and never have. My DC would still be disabled even if the benefit cap didn’t exist.

Secondly, we don’t profit from their additional needs. At all. And we are not ‘minted’. As I said, we spend far more on disability related expenses than we receive in disability benefits.

Thirdly, I don’t claim PIP for myself and DH doesn’t claim CA. So that part of your pp is also irrelevant rather than proving what you said.

BTW it isn’t the case that the only exclusion to the benefit cap is disability.

I won’t be explaining why I have DC with additional needs. It is irrelevant and, frankly, is none of your business.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 17:21

I won’t be explaining why I have DC with additional needs. It is relevant and, frankly, is none of your business.

I didn’t ask you.

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 17:24

Well you may not have tagged me or directly asked me but you did ask the question in response to my post and quoted my post.

Paperbagtrousers · 09/10/2026 17:24

Tillow4ever · 09/10/2026 11:09

Why is it rude? They were simply saying they agree with the poster they quoted. It happens all the time on this site.

Why do you get to dictate to them what they should or shouldn’t put on their post. That is for them to decide. You can choose to scroll past if you don’t like it. At least they contributed to the discussion put forward by the OP - you didn’t even address the question being asked!

Sorry Tillow- didn't mean you. I meant the original poster putting "discuss". I was actually agreeing with the other person who said the same thing.🤣😂

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 17:25

roaringdragon · 09/10/2026 17:24

Well you may not have tagged me or directly asked me but you did ask the question in response to my post and quoted my post.

I find it a bit silly when people bring up their own circumstances, allude to things then flounce when asked a very obvious or relevant question.

Swipe left for the next trending thread