Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Young / average / old motherhood

188 replies

Lacatrina · 11/10/2025 10:55

What would you consider is young to have a child, average to have a child and old to have a child.

Genuinely just interested. I would say 31 and under is quite young. 32-38 very average. 39+ starting to get into older category. But I'm SW London so aware these figures are totally unrepresentative of the whole picture

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Namechangerage · 12/10/2025 00:04

I felt average at 31, older at 36.

Young to me is under 23. Average 24 - 35. Older 35+

Namechangerage · 12/10/2025 00:06

Starbri8 · 11/10/2025 22:28

Seriously you have nothing to worry about 😉 I promise, you will never have to come in contact with anywhere my ass has been. Just to clarify I would wear a sarong sitting at a beach bar.

I have two young girls , I hope I succeed in teaching them not to judge others by their clothing choices. It’s sad that women are often so scathing about other women, especially over something so trivial.

How on earth did the thread descend into arguing about thongs and arse cracks?! So strange 🤣

34ransum · 12/10/2025 00:31

Young- 27 and under
Middle- 28-36
Old 37+ if a first child, 40+ for any

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

SouthLondonMum22 · 12/10/2025 00:44

I had mine at 36 and almost 38 which is incredibly average in my area. I'd say anything under 30 was young.

TheAmusedQuail · 12/10/2025 00:48

Under 23 young
24-33ish average
35 up old

Basically in line with the human female's body fertility

coxesorangepippin · 12/10/2025 02:21

I'd say anything from 16-25 is young

25-38ish is middle

38+ is older really

KawasakiBabe · 12/10/2025 02:37

I’m in the NE. My mum was 18 & 23 when she had my sister and me in the 60’s, even then she said she felt too young. I was 34 & 38, when I had mine in the 00’s.I think up here it used to be that people started younger than the national average and I’d say that was still true but that age is rising. I certainly didn’t feel old and there was plenty around me of the same age.

I’d say u24 is very young, u30 is young,, u40 average.

CarlaLemarchant · 12/10/2025 02:49

CrispsPlease · 11/10/2025 23:54

You may feel that way. But it doesn't make it right.

It totally makes it right in the context of the OPs question, which was asking people what they consider to be young/ average/old to have a baby. Everyone knows the biology, it’s clearly a question of social norms according to demographic which is why answers vary (and nobody but you has mentioned elitism).

I had my first at 32, biologically that is getting on a bit, it was socially very average in terms of my friendship group and area. There was a school mum who was in her early 20s and was by far the youngest. If I had settled and had my kids in a different area, she would have been an average age mum and I would have been the older one.

Theres nothing particularly controversial about the OP, you seem really intolerant to peoples different perspectives though.

CausalInference · 12/10/2025 03:16

22 or under too young

Under 30 young

30-38 average

39 or over older

I personally consider over 40 too old, I felt like I was pushing it having my last at 37.

pumpkinscake · 12/10/2025 04:17

Meadowfinch · 11/10/2025 19:34

I think of <20 is young, 21-40 is normal and 41< as old for motherhood.

Having said that, I had ds at 45 and didn't find it an issue. At 62 I'm now driving around the countryside looking at universities. So far, no-one has bat an eyelid.

I am the same and it's been fantastic. I didn't choose to leave it so late, I had 10 years of trying before adopting at 44. While it's been brilliant, and I'm very fit and healthy, I'd prefer to have been younger.

Thickasabrick89 · 12/10/2025 05:01

CrispsPlease · 11/10/2025 15:31

And people can have whatever opinions they like. But biologically I think my estimates are factual. We could all keep deluding ourselves and call 32 a "young" mum though 🙄 - ridiculous.

I was a young mum at 32 amongst my friendship group. The first of my friends to have a baby.

In reality 32 falls under average age.

Kurkara · 12/10/2025 05:29

Sundaymorningplans · 11/10/2025 16:45

I think people tend to wait longer now and have smaller families.

I had my two young (19&21) and although I was in a pretty good relationship/ stable household- we were always poor , that’s the only thing I would really change.

I see my 18 year old now and can’t imagine her being a parent- in fact I would be pretty sad for her.

I know that I had been with my now husband for a few years when we had her and we bought a house when I was pregnant- but in comparison my daughter seems so bloody young!

Although I’m sure I seemed very young to others as well

I see other people who were in my year at school just starting families and it seems mad ! I couldn’t do the no sleep bit now- far too old 🤣

One of my school mates was a nan before I'd had my first.
We each have our own row to hoe.

Apollonia1 · 12/10/2025 05:45

I consider
Young - 27 and under
Mid - 28-39
Older - 40+

My mum had kids from her late-30s to mid-40s (as did her peer group in the 1960s) and I was mid-40s having my kids.

Starbri8 · 12/10/2025 07:16

i Know ! I need to stop reacting !! 😀

Nottodaythankyou123 · 12/10/2025 07:57

I think it depends on where you live - I was 29 when my eldest started school, and most of them mums are 8-10 years older than me.

zingally · 12/10/2025 10:39

Hmm... I'd say 23 and under is young.
23-35 is average.
35 and up is old.

But this would be for a first baby. If I met a 38yo having their 3rd child, I wouldn't blink.

surprisebaby12 · 12/10/2025 10:43

I lived in London too. Under 31 is young to have a baby, anywhere from 32-42 is average a 43+ is older but not surprising

Babblingbooks · 12/10/2025 10:48

I think 23 - 33 is average. 34-36 I’d think was old for having a first/only child but not for having subsequent children but I don't quite know why I feel that’s different

stackhead · 12/10/2025 10:50

Young - Under 25
Average - 26-35
Old - 36+

East mids

LavenderBlue19 · 12/10/2025 10:54

None of my friends intentionally had a baby under 30, so I'd say under 30 is young. 30-maybe 38 is average, I'd say. And then 38+ is older, although quite common in my demographic (but I'm aware we lean older).

I was so shocked when my son started school by how young some of the mums were. 25 with two kids! It's a different world and wouldn't be for me, but I can see the benefits. If only we had more years to get a degree, get established in a decent career, save a house deposit, and start a family (and cope with the subsequent hit to our career/health/time).

Dogaredabomb · 12/10/2025 11:02

youalright · 11/10/2025 16:24

I would say under 20 young, 20 -30 average. 30 + old

I agree with you.

Tourmalines · 12/10/2025 11:06

Under 25 young , 25 to 29 early adult mother , 30 to 34 middle aged mother , 35 to 39 older mother , 40 and over advanced maternal age .

ToKittyornottoKitty · 12/10/2025 11:12

Tourmalines · 12/10/2025 11:06

Under 25 young , 25 to 29 early adult mother , 30 to 34 middle aged mother , 35 to 39 older mother , 40 and over advanced maternal age .

How is 29 and ‘early adult’ mother?

AngelofIslington · 12/10/2025 14:35

In my area
under 26 young
26 - 36 average
over 36 older
having said that I had my first 22 years ago and my notes clearly said geriatric mother and I was 31 so this just goes to show what we consider to be a normal age is very different to what biology dictates

FKAT · 12/10/2025 14:39

My sisters and I between us had children at: 16, 19, 22 (young) 34, 37 (average), 40 and 43 (old).

24 and younger - young
24-38 - average
39+ - old

I personally think 42 is the cut off. Nobody should have a child in school and a freedom pass.

Swipe left for the next trending thread