*Again you are misinterpreting,( doubtless deliberately to fit your narrative), sexual to mean sexually aroused.
I was responding to a poster who said that there is nothing inherently sexual about human bodies. Which is wrong - there clearly is. Human bodies are sexually mature bodies designed for sexual reproduction and we can all instantly see this when we see a naked adult. Men's genitals do not look like pre-pubescent boy's genitals.
You don't have be aroused to recognise that a naked human body is a sexual body, in a way a child's is not.
Lived experience, as you put it, is to instantly see the naked human body as a sexually mature body, in the way you don't when you see a child.
Bizarrely, we now live in the fucked up state where we would not consider it ok for a bunch of pre-pubescent children to parade naked, because some perverts would see their bodies as sexual, but we are all meant to pretend that there is nothing at all sexual about a naked adult body at all.*
Jeez @Monochord I'm not 'pretending' anything and I don't need need to be Mumsnet- splained lectured about sexual/sexuality/ sexually aroused etc etc
Sexually mature adult or not, with obvious markers of being able to sexually reproduce or not, it made not jot of difference. Sexual was the thought furthest from head the one time I saw this ride go past.
It was naked bods. Curious in that aspect alone.
And there's probably a huge bunch of people, those who go to those nudist colonys on the continent, with supermarkets, petrol stations etc etc who would understand this point of view.
*Again you are misinterpreting,( doubtless deliberately to fit your narrative), sexual to mean sexually aroused.
*
And no, nothing deliberate, I just don't agree with you.