My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Parenting

www.m0del.co.uk

317 replies

na5ima · 24/11/2015 10:11

Hello All,
I applied for my son to join the modelling agency m0del (the O isn't a letter it's number zero) and he got selected. He his 5 month and 3 weeks.

I know I should of done the research beforehand however I can't find much info on the agency now and to find info is from the website only. Has anyone come across this website. I applied through Facebook.

Let me know Smile
Thanks
Nas

OP posts:
Report
WetDogLovesHubert · 22/02/2016 10:56

I was scammed by these gits last Friday. I have followed all advice on here and elsewhere, and reported to my credit card company, Fraud Action, Watchdog and demanded a full refund from the 'company' I was scammed by - Firefly Create Ltd. in Bristol. I will tell everyone I know to spread awareness of these scammers.

Report
TanDawson · 22/02/2016 19:41

Elliott2014 - I felt that someone had to look into their dealings so that everyone could know that these scammers are benefiting from everyone's hard earned money, duping loving parents and shattering the dreams of the thousands of people that they have offered contracts to, with no guarantee or proof of work, thus leaving heartbroken children, shattered confidences and for many a big chunk of their hard earned savings.

My children have been with 'Adora' since 2014 and not once have I received a call for work for either of them, nor a courtesy email from time to time to assure me that they are still looking for work for them both.

The vile, greedy creatures that own all 3 agencies by the looks of things, namely Anthony Jones (Abigail? Chrissy?) and his partner in crime Nicola Jones are nothing but opportunists that have most possibly made millions from this scam in all the years they have been running it.

Everyone should know this, and everyone should boycott the studios they use also!!

Report
wheeze65 · 23/02/2016 06:20

For those people who have been to the police and got nowhere, you can report the fraud online at the Action Fraud website here: www.actionfraud.police.uk/report_fraud

The type of fraud you are reporting is Career Opportunity Scams: www.actionfraud.police.uk/fraud-az-career-opportunity-scams

You will then get a police crime reference number. Take that to your bank as evidence to support getting your money back! Good luck!

Report
CheerfulYank · 23/02/2016 06:49

Shock How vile!

Report
wheeze65 · 23/02/2016 17:30

"Chrissy" is still watching this thread and Facebook, and obviously doesn't like the advice I'm handing out.



[email protected]
Today at 7:37 AM

To

Message body


I have sent screen shots of your comments on face book to the studio
who I believe will be contacting you.
Quite frankly you should be ashamed of yourself. You are not content
with obtaining a free photo shoot , mua and portfolio. You still wish
to spread total lies and hear say.

I hope they can do something about your behaviour and stop your vendetta.

Our CEO is contemplating releasing a statement on the situation
regarding yourself and your daughter. This statement would no doubt
attract google which would rank names , places and the entire
situation rather high.

Chrissy

Report
smallspikyleaves · 23/02/2016 17:35

LOL "chrissy" is a right dick head

hope this "agency" gets whats coming to them

Report
Inwaiting · 23/02/2016 18:06

Nice! They're now threatening you. Let them carry on they'll soon find themselves on a TV show slating them. Sure there's loads of programmes that would like to take on a story of exploiting children.

Report
Inwaiting · 23/02/2016 18:08

What is laughable is that it's not just you and your daughter is it. There are many posters exposing the company as a scam.

I can't even find m0del.co.uk on the net. First thing to come up is mums net so good luck with that one Chrissy! Have a nice evening :)

Report
Woodenmouse · 23/02/2016 18:15

I applied with my son, I went to the test shoot and they were absolutely awful. Ds is 2.5 and they expected him to sit still for a really long photo shoot. The photographer yelled at ds for not following instructions (he's 2.5 ffs he can't follow complex instructions). He got so upset I just picked him up and walked out with him. I wouldnt trust them!

Report
smallspikyleaves · 24/02/2016 09:05

haha I would love these to end up shamed on telly. rogue traders or something

they are an absolute joke

Report
Farrellxo · 25/02/2016 09:25

We went to the w10 Buspace studios in London and ended up paying £474 I have reported both m0del and the studio to action fraud.

Report
tracy1972 · 25/02/2016 17:46

I also went to the bank try to stop my £220 payment ! Got my bank account closed and a warning letter for having made a false statement ! Because i signed the document at the studio which said : once i leave the premises i agree i have receive the goods.
Then i tried the cooling off period and was told by a citizen adviser that this was only applicable when i dealt directly with an agency ! The studio is not an agency.
Lastly, the fraud departement told me that there is nothing i can do as i have been given the choice to purchase or not !
All there is left for me, is a lesson learnt ! But the i got amazing pictures at least

Report
wheeze65 · 25/02/2016 18:13

tracy1972, were you led to believe that if you didn't buy the photos there and then that you wouldn't be able to buy them at a later date? Did they tell you that M0del needed the photos within a certain time frame?

Report
tracy1972 · 25/02/2016 19:16

Wheeze65,

No i wasnt ! I brought the pictures because i loved them and i needed them for other agencies as well! The reason i wanted to block the payment was because i was a bit worried that i paid too much.
Then i called the bank to stop the payment to go through and got a letter back from them saying that i gave them a false statement and that they will close my account because i did sign the letter from the studio which they received from the studio and said nothing was wrong. So i got more worried about my bank than the studio ! Perhaps when someone signed a monthly standing order its different !
However, i didn't feel pressured. They did give me the choice. Also a friend of mine was there last week with her own photos and they never offered her to buy any more. Weird ! Maybe it differs from a studio to the next !

Report
Mumsy24 · 26/02/2016 11:28

Wheeze65, How did you manage to get your daughters money back, I am trying to email them but they seem to have everything covered. i called the photography people last week and spoke to a man who told me the guy that sold us the photos does not work to secure jobs for models on their books he simply just deals with photos and all we have payed for is the copyright he told me he is happy to play the cctv back to me. Am I better off telling the police and letting them view the cctv to see that he gave false information. He didn't even give us a chance to read the bit of paper he stuck in front of us it was just 'right sign there and then pop over here and stick your card in' stupidly didn't read it until we got home.

Report
wheeze65 · 26/02/2016 20:35

Mumsy24, a page or so back I posted a link to the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, if you feel you have been forced or coerced into making a purchase you wouldn't normally have made, i.e. if you'd had time to think about what you were buying, or they were making every effort to get you to part with your cash. M0del are playing very sly by using the photographers to do the hard sell, that way they think it can't be traced back to them. It is the photographers that you have to get your money back from. I will send you a PM with more info.

Report
Mary19001 · 27/02/2016 10:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

wheeze65 · 27/02/2016 15:52

Mary, my daughter is 21. She decided of her own accord to make contact with these people because she felt she could make a go of it. I hardly think I'm the perfect mother, I do what I can, and as for spending all my time on here, I only joined to find out more about M0del Agency and I only stay to try and stop this happening to anyone else.

Report
abigailshaw · 27/02/2016 16:58

wheeze65 I have paid 450 for 15 images last week, they were so forceful that didnt even get time to think and decide and end up losing this money. Could you advice what can be done. All the procedure was same long hours wait, couple dozen pictures and bad behavior.

Report
Reevamarlin80 · 27/02/2016 17:55

I have to agree with Mary, though no one will ever get their money back ! A friend of mine tried with the Blueroom because her pictures were not professional enough, she was told by the police fraud that they had much more important matters to deal with, that no one forced her to go to that studio and no one forced her to pay ! If the payment was taken without her consent or if she paid and received nothing, then it would be a differemt matter. So then she tries with the bank and same story, they told her sorry but we have proof you inserted your pin code and signed a letter that you have received the goods. Either way, waste of time and energy ! That business has been going on for over 20 years if you look online !

Report
wheeze65 · 27/02/2016 19:17

www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/regulation/7/made
Aggressive commercial practices

7.—(1) A commercial practice is aggressive if, in its factual context, taking account of all of its features and circumstances—

(a)it significantly impairs or is likely significantly to impair the average consumer’s freedom of choice or conduct in relation to the product concerned through the use of harassment, coercion or undue influence; and

(b)it thereby causes or is likely to cause him to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise.

(2) In determining whether a commercial practice uses harassment, coercion or undue influence account shall be taken of—

(a)its timing, location, nature or persistence;

(b)the use of threatening or abusive language or behaviour;

(c)the exploitation by the trader of any specific misfortune or circumstance of such gravity as to impair the consumer’s judgment, of which the trader is aware, to influence the consumer’s decision with regard to the product;

(d)any onerous or disproportionate non-contractual barrier imposed by the trader where a consumer wishes to exercise rights under the contract, including rights to terminate a contract or to switch to another product or another trader; and

(e)any threat to take any action which cannot legally be taken.

(3) In this regulation—

(a)“coercion” includes the use of physical force; and

(b)“undue influence” means exploiting a position of power in relation to the consumer so as to apply pressure, even without using or threatening to use physical force, in a way which significantly limits the consumer’s ability to make an informed decision.

Report
000000blue · 28/02/2016 18:47

Cripes! Studio 94 and Model Agency are taking a slating on here. Here’s a review of our experience to hopefully set the record straight as I know people rarely take the time to acknowledge good service but are quick to decry bad.

Firstly, we very nearly cancelled on the back of these slating reviews but thankfully we didn’t and decided to head over and formulate our own opinions to share with you. We were early for our shoot and sat outside Studio94 for a while to watch the comings and goings. It’s not the nicest of areas tbf and people were being photographed in the street against a brick wall; not what we wanted or were expecting at all. And, again, we very nearly drove away. Once inside, however, we quickly realised that Studio94 share the building with another photographer who has a studio there, and it wasn’t Studio94 who were taking photos in the street, possibly the client from the other studio had requested these. So things aren’t always as they appear.

Anyway, we rang the bell and went inside. The communal areas were a bit grotty but both studios looked fit for purpose. We weren’t expecting a lot, due to the bad reviews, and were ready to walk out at the first opportunity if we didn’t get what we were promised, i.e. a photo shoot (funded totally by Model Agency – Studio94 are a separate entity) and a free assessment (by Studio94) of your potential as a model for Model Agency. Not for YOU, for Model Agency to then decide if they want to work with you or not. And that’s exactly what we got. I repeat what you are told before you go so that there is no misunderstanding, the images and the report aren’t for you, they’re for Model Agency. Model Agency aren’t a charity offering free photo shoots and photos to everyone so if that’s what you’re expecting, please don’t book as you will be wasting everyone’s time and money.

When you book your shoot you will also be told to allow 3 hours. Not understanding why people are saying they ‘waited around’ for 20/30 minutes. There is a lot of waiting around on modelling jobs and you will be assessed on your patience. You are told that when you book. We were out in just under 3 hours so no issue there either.

The hair and make-up girl got to work as soon as we arrived. And did a great job. Very pleasant, putting everyone at ease. We took 3 outfits with us as suggested and were then shown to a changing room. A guy named Charlie introduced himself as our photographer. And, as SmallMommy says, the studio had a lot of equipment and Charlie knew his job. He took 51 photos in total, not 6. The photos he took were first class.

We waited around for quite a while after the shoot. But found out that this was because the images and the assessment are submitted to Model Agency while you wait, who then decide whether they want to work with you or not. We were then called through by a guy called Drew to discuss Model Agency’s decision and be briefed on their process. And obviously we were given the opportunity to view our photos. Who wouldn’t want to? But there was NO hard sell whatsoever. We didn’t feel pressurised to buy them at any point and Drew said absolutely fine if you don’t want to. We weren’t locked in and were free to leave at any time with or without photos which I have to say were excellent value for money. A friend of ours is a photographer and would have charged way more for a portfolio even at ‘mates rates’! Even SmallMommy found other photographers were going to charge her more and changed her mind after walking away, wishing she had bought them.

The mystery for me is why people think they are being scammed when they get what they were offered for free, but then someone tells them the reasonable price of the photos which they then decide not to buy? Obviously if you don’t have any photos the agency won’t be able to get you any work. How would they? No-one is going to buy into someone they can’t see. And obviously Model Agency can determine the quality of the photos they are willing to publish on THEIR website. It’s their business and their reputation at stake after all. A page full of selfies isn’t really going to cut the mustard imo.

So there is no scam at all that I can see. If you choose to buy the photos you take them away with you. And they are yours to keep, print, submit to other agencies etc etc. If Model Agency choose not to work with you, or you choose not to work with them, still no scam. They have paid for your photo shoot and modelling assessment, you have lost nothing at all. So I am intrigued to hear what Rogue Traders will have to say?

If Model Agency decide they want to work with you, and you with them, you then receive a contract. Nothing dodgy there either, in fact quite the opposite in that you’re not tied into them, you can work with as many different agencies as you want. In fact this is encouraged. They take 20% of your fee. Again, if you don’t feel this is acceptable, don’t sign. You can then create your own profile so anyone interested can book you directly, or you can access the general enquiries for models Model Agency have received and, if you feel you meet the criteria, you apply.

Delighted to hear from anyone who feels they have been scammed and why. As, I’m sure, would Studio94 and Model Agency.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

000000blue · 28/02/2016 21:46

Studio94

www.m0del.co.uk
Report
000000blue · 28/02/2016 21:48

Studio94

www.m0del.co.uk
Report
wheeze65 · 29/02/2016 18:58

To 000000blue: I did ask M0del some very pertinent questions which they refused to answer. I asked them to let me know the names of some of the companies that have hired their models, so I could verify they were a real model agency. I asked why, with all the different branches listed on their website, was there only one phone number for them, the same number that even the photography studio had for them. I asked them to confirm or deny that they were the same people responsible for Adora and Blackberry modelling agencies, who have both got a long list of complaints against them registered with Trading Standards (they didn't really need to answer this as I already know they are all companies registered under the same person). I asked them why the EUMA is also registered in the same person's name, and why there wasn't any contact address for the EUMA. I also asked why if the EUMA seemed to be so good, were they apparently the only modelling agency signed up to them.

I didn't get any answers to these questions. And you wonder why I didn't/don't trust them.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.