Rich or poor, I think most of us can appreciate relationship problems to a greater or lesser degree.
Though I don't contribute that much, I've read these boards for over a year, and generally, most relationship problems are responded to in a thoughtful manner. The poster may not always be agreed with, but "strangers" still take the time and make the effort to try and help, even if that is putting across a different point of view.
On some posts, I've been amazed and touched when other Mnetters offer real-life practical support to people in trouble. So, all in all, I think the people who frequent these boards are a pretty good bunch.
However, I am sorry if this sounds blunt - but there is a world of difference between seeking sympathy for your mean/miserly/non-understanding other half (mentioning no figures) - for which I am sure Carla would have got nothing but supportive replies - and alternatively, stating your DH is mean, stating a figure which is generous by most people's standards and then confusing the issue (when people naturally start to ask questions which might be seen as probing, because they don't actually understand what the gripe is, in the way it's been presented) by providing conflicting info.
Yes - money doesn't protect you from everything, but at the risk of being shot, I'd rather be in a bad relationship with money (and the sort of money where I could afford to put some by for eventualties), than a bad relationship without money. There are many people here who have bad relationships and no money, and physically, can't see a way out, or of starting over.
No, we shouldn't dish out our sympathy based on how much someone has in the bank, but when they introduce the topic, they need to understand that people will bear that in mind when forming their replies.