Please or to access all these features

Nurseries

Find nursery advice from other Mumsnetters on our Nursery forum. For more guidance on early years development, sign up for Mumsnet Ages & Stages emails.

2k invoice for nursery pls help!

286 replies

extraordinarymachine26 · 06/10/2026 12:22

We were eligible for Tax free and 30 free hours. DC just turned 3.
I was made redundant this Mar, DP quit his job this August (so now none of us are in paid employment).

AFAIK there is a grace period for the 30 free hours, we were paying normal rate until this wk (Oct) nursery said the code doesn't work anymore and now they have send us a £2,300 bill for this month (3 days per week PLUS the shortfall for Sep now that apparently we didn't have funding then).

Am I right in there being a grace period for these 30 free hours or will we just have to suck up and pay the below and probably take DC out of nursery ASAP as this is in no way affordable for 2 unemployed ppl!

We are not entitled to UC but DP is on New style JSA (and looking for work but unlikely to find something till 2027 given the current market).

Anyone with any advice would be welcome!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 19:48

WheresMyHatGone · Yesterday 19:32

Where do you think the money comes from to pay for the nursery fees and the benefits that they will be living on?

As I understand, she used 30 funded hours when she was working.
She is not claiming any benefits as I understand.
You said she is unemployed and living off tax payers.
She has been foolish in continuing with the funded hours when not entitled to. She is going to have to pay it back.
Her partner/boyfriend/father of child is claiming JSA - less than £100 a week, which is contribution based.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 19:50

littlematchstickgirl · Yesterday 19:45

Fair enough - I appreciate it takes time to tailor applications, but what about the numerous months after those 6 weeks, where the OP said herself that she hadn’t done anything? Yet expects tax-payers money to subsidise?

Where has she said she is expecting tax payers to subsidise?
She has said she liked her child being in nursery while she was job hunting, but she is having to pay that back.

WheresMyHatGone · Yesterday 20:30

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 19:48

As I understand, she used 30 funded hours when she was working.
She is not claiming any benefits as I understand.
You said she is unemployed and living off tax payers.
She has been foolish in continuing with the funded hours when not entitled to. She is going to have to pay it back.
Her partner/boyfriend/father of child is claiming JSA - less than £100 a week, which is contribution based.

The funded hours is funded by taxes and she was not eligible for it but continued to send her child.
She says she is not claiming benefits (not sure I believe her TBH) but her partner is claiming JSA...again funded by taxes, whether contribution based or not. If he got himself a job then he wouldn't have to be claiming it would he.

littlematchstickgirl · Yesterday 20:32

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 19:50

Where has she said she is expecting tax payers to subsidise?
She has said she liked her child being in nursery while she was job hunting, but she is having to pay that back.

She accepted nursery hours that she is only entitled to whilst working, and would have continued to do so had she not been billed. She wasn’t working and wasn’t even trying to find a job after the first six weeks.

Presumably the nursery don’t offer this for free and are subsidised by the government, who use tax money for that.

SheilaFentiman · Yesterday 20:40

WheresMyHatGone · Yesterday 20:30

The funded hours is funded by taxes and she was not eligible for it but continued to send her child.
She says she is not claiming benefits (not sure I believe her TBH) but her partner is claiming JSA...again funded by taxes, whether contribution based or not. If he got himself a job then he wouldn't have to be claiming it would he.

My understanding from posts earlier on this thread is that a redundancy in March wouldn’t lead to the funding being stopped until 31 August (or the end of the summer term if the nursery was term time only). So she was eligible for the hours that were paid.

Those are the hours she has received, and she hasn’t received further funded hours as the nursery is in shortfall when the code didn’t go through.

So she hasn’t not “lived off taxpayers” as she has only received the correct amount of funded hours for her timings of employment/redundancy.

SheilaFentiman · Yesterday 20:45

C8H10N4O2 · Yesterday 19:29

But if you are unemployed you apply for every job you might be interviewed for not just your niche area.

The key thing is to be back in work and earning, then you can look for something more your preference or specialism from the position of being in a job.

I wouldn’t apply for “every” job. Not immediately after a redundancy. She isn’t claiming UC so isn’t necessarily obliged to go to a string of interviews where she’s unlikely to succeed. She may have a redundancy payment or savings that are covering rent and food.

And I frankly wouldn’t expect to get far with “every” job if my CV was all about my professional research into Dutch modern linguistics.

SheilaFentiman · Yesterday 20:52

She says she is not claiming benefits (not sure I believe her TBH)

You have no grounds for your disbelief. Why post if you think the OP is talking BS?

but her partner is claiming JSA…

Her partner/BF isn’t posting and she disagreed with his decision to resign.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 21:02

WheresMyHatGone · Yesterday 20:30

The funded hours is funded by taxes and she was not eligible for it but continued to send her child.
She says she is not claiming benefits (not sure I believe her TBH) but her partner is claiming JSA...again funded by taxes, whether contribution based or not. If he got himself a job then he wouldn't have to be claiming it would he.

And (as has been said many times), she has been billed for and will pay back.
If you don't believe she is not claiming then there's little point in you giving your POV, I'm just going on what she's has told us.
What the man is doing is not relevant - they don't live together.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 21:04

littlematchstickgirl · Yesterday 20:32

She accepted nursery hours that she is only entitled to whilst working, and would have continued to do so had she not been billed. She wasn’t working and wasn’t even trying to find a job after the first six weeks.

Presumably the nursery don’t offer this for free and are subsidised by the government, who use tax money for that.

But she has been billed so the government (or whoever) will get it back.
She has been taking a course, presumably to improve her opportunities. Maybe she has the funds for this.

Fupoffyagrasshole · Yesterday 21:06

littlematchstickgirl · Yesterday 20:32

She accepted nursery hours that she is only entitled to whilst working, and would have continued to do so had she not been billed. She wasn’t working and wasn’t even trying to find a job after the first six weeks.

Presumably the nursery don’t offer this for free and are subsidised by the government, who use tax money for that.

You don’t know what your talking about

The op hasn’t received any free hours from anyone - the nursery tried to claim the and they got rejected so she now is going to pay her nursery bill ??

how is that taking anything from anyone ffs

littlematchstickgirl · Yesterday 21:10

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Yesterday 21:04

But she has been billed so the government (or whoever) will get it back.
She has been taking a course, presumably to improve her opportunities. Maybe she has the funds for this.

Ok, fair enough. Maybe I’m being unreasonable.

However, it still stands that very little effort has gone into finding another job after the initial six weeks - what did she think was going to happen?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page