Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet campaigns

For more information on Mumsnet Campaigns, check our our Campaigns hub.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

URGENT! Asda have signed up to our Let Girls Be Girls campaign - and would like to consult you quickly!

296 replies

HelenMumsnet · 14/04/2010 17:55

Hello.

As we hope you've already seen, George at Asda were one of the first clothing ranges to sign up to our Let Girls Be Girls campaign.

And now they've phoned us to ask for our help.

The press (who are all over this story today) have contacted Asda to point out that they're selling this T-shirt for girls.

Asda would love to know whether Mumsnetters think it's OK or not.

They say that, as they've signed up to Let Girls Be Girls, they'll take action if we have a negative reaction to the T-shirt.

Please post your comments ASAP - Asda are biting their nails...

OP posts:
BuzzingNoise · 14/04/2010 18:18

Not ok at all.

LadyintheRadiator · 14/04/2010 18:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaTrucha · 14/04/2010 18:19

Too much of this, IMO. It's the same way grown women are commonly targeted at the moment too ('Gorgeous' bags from Boots / 'Your feet look gorgeous' from New Look) so there is a link to self-presentation / glamour which I don't like.

MmeLindt · 14/04/2010 18:20

PrettyCandles
I don't really like any tshirt slogans that reduce a child to one character trait. We are not one dimensional.

My DS could do with one that says

"Right now I am lovely, sensible and funny but wait around two minutes and I might do something really daft"

but that is not really very catchy, is it?

As to the Future Brain Surgeon one, there was a trend for baby tshirts in Germany with the slogan "Abi 2028" which means the year that the child should pass his A-levels (Abitur). Seriously PFB SmugMummySyndrome.

TrinityIsAPenguin · 14/04/2010 18:21

it just hideous but not sexualising

grumpypants · 14/04/2010 18:22

Perhaps I am overthinking, but if gorgeous is an understatement, what word would you use to describe the wearer? Because some of the alternatives to gorgeous stray into sexulaised language. Having thought about it, I would not buy it, but my immediate reaction is yuk (ok without words).

FabIsGoingToGetFit · 14/04/2010 18:22

I don't like it, I wouldn't buy it but it is much better than some of the crap that is sold these days.

scottishmummy · 14/04/2010 18:25

horrid.but i dont like t shirt slogans.look tacky

ahundredtimes · 14/04/2010 18:27

I think it is the thinnest end of the wedge, as others have said. Not sexualizing - but still about looks, which is just wrong for children - and definitely part of the wedge, just not the worst culprit. I wouldn't buy for dd (8) if that helps?

I don't like slogans though. Mostly because you read a slogan on a t-shirt, and then that word is in your head. It's weird. You'd look at a girl wearing that, read the words and think 'gorgeous' or that boy in the M&S one and think 'attitude'. I don't want those words in my head. It's weird. I have, of course, way over thought this.

GrimmaTheNome · 14/04/2010 18:28

Slogans are particularly bad on older girls when they're just beginning to develop.

ahundredtimes · 14/04/2010 18:28

Oh but THANK YOU George at Asda for signing up. That's fantastic

tatt · 14/04/2010 18:33

congratulations on signing up, ASDA. Wouldn't regard this as the sort of clothing the campaign is about but agree that it's not appealing. Wouldn't buy it.

Miggsie · 14/04/2010 18:34

How about "I'm going to win the Nobel prize for science".

Bet that never gets printed on a glittery pink T-shirt.

Molesworth · 14/04/2010 18:34

Agree with 100x, it's the thin end of the wedge

schroeder · 14/04/2010 18:41

It is horrible, but probably not overtly sexual. I would agree asda's clothes have got worse in the last year or two. I struggle to find things that aren't Hannah Montana or High School Musical for my dd(7).

Great news they have joined the campaign though.

MadameCastafiore · 14/04/2010 18:41

It's vile - not a style a young girl should be wearing but that goes for most of the clothes on the high street and the crap you pick up at the supermarket is the worst offending and crappily made so am not surprised at all.

cakeywakey · 14/04/2010 18:41

Nobel prize for literature surely? Or a selection of all the prizes to choose from. wonder which would be the most popular

noviewsonbiscuits · 14/04/2010 18:42

I think it is vile and the thin end of the wedge. I simply don't think that children, particularly young girls, should parade around in clothing which refers to their good looks.

And yes, I do think gorgeous refers to good looks, not good brain/ character. Generally.

mussyhillmum · 14/04/2010 18:44

Thank you ASDA for signing up and for canvassing opinion. I agree with previous posters that whilst it does not sexualise girls as overtly as padded bras, it emphasises appearance far too much. I would never buy anything like this for my DD.

zazizoma · 14/04/2010 18:47

I don't believe this shirt to be sexualising girls in the way this campaign is designed to combat. It's more of gender stereotyping, which falls under the pink glitter princess category. NOT the focus of the campaign. My vote is the shirt is okay.

LoveJules3 · 14/04/2010 18:48

Wouldn't buy it myself cos i think the whole outfit's a bit tacky, but as a slogan goes it's not awful.

Think it could sneak past the jury.

PestoMonster · 14/04/2010 18:53

Yuk

LadyGaggia · 14/04/2010 18:56

Don't like it, wouldn't buy it, but don't think it sexualises the wearer

PixieOnaLeaf · 14/04/2010 18:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

scoutliam · 14/04/2010 18:58

Not sexual but objectionable on the grounds of being manky.