Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

How to give money fairly to children

211 replies

PetaMatt · 16/06/2025 14:14

Following my mother's death I have inherited a large sum and I want to use it to help my children onto the property ladder (I am taking advice about varying the will).

I am due to receive about £800k. Where DS1 lives, a decent one bed flat costs about £250k. Where DS2 lives it would be more like £350k. I know they are both keen to buy a flat.

WWYD-

  1. give them each the price of a one bed flat (£250k and £350k)
  2. give them each the price of a one bed flat as above plus give DS1 an extra £100k
  3. give them each the price of a one bed flat as above and reflect the £100k difference in my will
  4. give them each £250k and suggest DS2 gets a mortgage for the difference
  5. something else?

I don't need the money myself although I will appreciate the security of having whatever is left.

OP posts:
Eldermileniummam · 17/06/2025 13:03

Give them the same

they choose where to live

user1476613140 · 17/06/2025 13:08

Same amount each or nothing at all.

LadyLapsang · 17/06/2025 13:14

Give them exactly the same amount now.

QuinionsRainbow · 17/06/2025 13:14

TreadSoftlyOnMyDreams · 16/06/2025 17:07

The same. I'd be inclined to get some financial advice as to how best to minimise the tax implications though. They might be better off if you gave them the same deposit amount which they can then afford the mortgage on and for you to max out their ISA's annually for 10 years.

Legal advice definitely essential. We gave our DS 30K towards a mortgage deposit about ten years ago. His mortgage provider required fully documented proof of the provenance of the money, and we had to sign legally certified documentation, with full ID confirmations, before we could go ahead. And then we had to survive for seven years to extinguish any tax liability for such a large gift. So beware - regardless of how you choose to apportion your gift, you can't just write a cheque or make a bank transfer with impunity. HMRC will have an interest in what you do.

viques · 17/06/2025 13:15

Give them the same amount. The cheaper area one can upgrade themselves from a one bed to a slightly bigger or better property , the other will have a smaller property but in a more expensive area. Both outcomes are satisfactory.

godmum56 · 17/06/2025 13:15

I think its a case of a gift should have ribbons not strings. I think you should give them whatever you decide, same amount each and no strings on what it should be used for.

Forktrip · 17/06/2025 13:17

Give them the same and it has to be a gift. You don't get to say what they spend it on. Their choice if they spend it on cars and women!

Pibrea · 17/06/2025 13:17

Give them the same amount on the condition that it’s used for property, but not necessarily a one bed flat. If my parent had given me that kind of money I’d have used it to buy a bigger home and got a mortgage for the rest. A proper house is usually a much better investment than a flat.

YellowGrey · 17/06/2025 13:18

I would give them £300k each and keep £200k for myself.

Xenia · 17/06/2025 13:18

I have helped five children by a house so have certainly dealt with this. Everyone has had exactly the same amount of money./ I cannot it being fair otherwise. So in the case here I would give them the same - the higher sum and the one where a flat costs less than that give them the higher sum and require them to buy a 2 bed or house ie property of the same value.

My gifts were only for a property and I transferred the money to the conveyancing solicitor directly (so the children could not of course then spend it on something else but remain free to sell the place and gamble it if they want of course or give it to a spouse no divorce (two are married with children and I know the divorce risk but it was just simpler to make an outright gift and they married someone with similar earnings and capital - wise children).

Throwntothewolves · 17/06/2025 13:20

Give them both exactly the same, it's the only fair way

DaisyChain505 · 17/06/2025 13:21

Give them the same set amount.

HunnyPot · 17/06/2025 13:22

Could you give them both £350k ?

skyeisthelimit · 17/06/2025 13:29

I think you need to give them both the same amount. They are choosing which area to live in, and you can't give one more than the other.

You could give one more and reflect it in your will, but what happens if all the money goes and that doesn't happen.

It will cause huge resentment if you give one more than the other.

Boreded · 17/06/2025 13:30

I feel like this is a non-issue, they both get exactly the same amount. You decide what you are comfortable giving them, and they decide what to do with any additional funds.

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 17/06/2025 13:31

Give them the same amount, but think very carefully about how much of the money you may need for yourself - consider the financial implications of future ill health, divorce, care home fees etc. Don't risk a situation where you regret giving away the bulk of the money and silently resent them for not giving some back or for 'frittering it away'. If they are already thinking of buying a flat then they can afford at least part of a mortgage. Being given too much too young is not always helpful and you would still reserve the right to give them more later.

CarraghInish · 17/06/2025 13:36

Option 2 sounds fair, and they can choose what to buy with that.

Iwannabeadog · 17/06/2025 13:38

In my family our parents gave us 10% deposits. I was lucky that I only needed about 3k (it was the early 90s and I chose a cheaper area!) and my siblings needed about 10-20k about 5-10 years later.
I have never felt it was unfair as we all achieved the same outcome, a spot on the property ladder.
I suppose the only other thing is that this was a pretty small amount of money compared to yours!

ALJT · 17/06/2025 13:45

I’d give them both the same amount and the second son could mortgage the left over - it will be cheaper than his rent and still a huge help.

Mirandawrongs · 17/06/2025 13:55

Split the difference give them £300k each.
it’s not their fault one lives in a more expensive area than the other.
its fairer.
sort your will to show equality too (speaking from experience)

Pipsquiggle · 17/06/2025 14:32

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 17/06/2025 12:43

I seem to be the only one who thinks that an equal split isn't necessarily the right thing.

It's not necessarily true that they could just up sticks and move. There may be good reasons other than personal preference for them being where they are. For example, their jobs might not exist elsewhere, their health may mean they need to stay close to a centre of excellence, their other responsibilities (or those of their partners) - there must be many more.

Ultimately I think you have to accept that unless two people are in exactly the same circumstances and have exactly the same needs, there will always be a tension between giving them the same amount ant meeting the same needs. There will always be the potential that one of them will think that it's fair to do it by amount and one will think it's fair to do it by need. Do you know what each of them thinks? I would be having an open discussion with them both to find out.

@MontyDonsBlueScarf nope disagree.

Giving different amounts of money due to location would cause way more resentment.

Yes some people 'have' to be in a certain location, yet for most it's a choice. Particularly if you are young and have less ties - this tends to be a stage in your life when you're most mobile.

CantStopMoving · 17/06/2025 14:34

@Pipsquiggle agree. It isn’t a parent’s job to give to their children according to need. The children are adults who make their own life choices and are responsible for their own lives. A gift should always be given freely and independently for simply being your child.

NewsdeskJC · 17/06/2025 16:12

Tell them both you have earmarked £250k each for them when they are ready to buy a home.
The rest will sort itself out.

christmasgeek · 17/06/2025 16:21

Definitely the same.

However (I might be going against the grain here) I wouldn't give them the total amount for an average 1 bed flat (so £250k) I would give them less so they both have to get a mortgage for the remaining amount, otherwise you do run the risk that whilst it's fair to give both the same amount, the one who has to get a mortgage to go towards their purchase may resent you for the other not having to.

Personally, I'd be looking at £150,000 towards buying a property, and then you could give them an additional amount further down the line, perhaps when their purchase has gone through to help with furnishing the property etc.

They both then have the same starting point - money towards a flat / house, not a flat bought outright.

irregularegular · 17/06/2025 16:23

I'd give them equal amounts. They have a choice over where to live and work. If someone chooses to live in an expensive area then they will need to bear the extra cost.

Swipe left for the next trending thread