Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Do you feel bad for receiving a ‘high amount’ of UC?

1000 replies

AnotherNameChange1233 · 01/05/2024 18:53

Last week I went to my local Children’s Centre and attended a Citizen’s Advice group that runs once a week.

As long as you’re registered to the Children Centre, you can turn up for any advice needed. Some people want privacy so they go into a side room with the advisor and some parents may help other parents if they’ve been in a similar situation/can offer the correct advice. It’s also like a social group for parents, hopefully you get the jist of it.

On the table I was sitting on, one parent was trying to get her head around UC as she didn’t quite understand LHA rates, how DLA impacts UC and what elements she would be entitled too. Anyway, I started speaking about my experience with DLA, UC and offered to log into my UC account if it was easier for her to look at the breakdown visually (instead of me talking and complicating things). I also got her postcode to explain how the LHA rates work and etc.

Another parent suddenly spoke up and said, ‘don’t you feel bad for claiming that much money?’ She wasn’t argumentative or anything and we had an interesting conversation but it made me think, are people like me supposed to feel bad when receiving a certain amount?

She also said something like (I’m paraphrasing here as I can’t remember it exactly word for word) if people can’t afford their rent then they should move to a more affordable area. I raised the point of Landlords purchasing properties as part of the Right to Buy scheme, charging extortionate rent which taxpayers then pay through UC. Surely, it’s more a problem that there isn’t affordable rental properties in many areas.

For full transparency, I’m going to mention all of my UC amounts and wonder if people that claim similar, feel bad?

  • 292 single person allowance
  • 1450 private rent
  • 539 for 2 children
  • 293 for 2 disabled children
  • 589 childcare costs
  • 189 carer

£216 is deducted from my entitlement due to my wages. That means my UC amount is £3133. My wages is £771. I receive two amounts of MRC through DLA which is £580 all together.

Now that I’ve written it down, it seems like a whole lot of money but the costs that come with raising one of my disabled children (the other still costs a lot, but not as much as the other) is through the roof due to their issues

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
WannabeHealthier · 02/05/2024 10:55

I don’t think you should feel bad, you clearly have a hard life and you’re not swanning around living in luxury, despite your very high household income.

But the father(s) of your 4 children absolutely need to be held responsible and pay their fair share for each child. This amount is then deducted from your benefit income- with the cost to taxpayers minimised.

If there is more than one father and they are in good jobs, it could even negate 100% of your benefit payments. If the fathers don’t pay up, or engage in fraud to minimise payments, criminal charges should be brought against them.

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:56

@JosiePosey

The problem here is not the benefits for this the family but the fact that it’s extremely hard to earn the same amount. That’s what should change. Workers need to paid properly and fairly. I’m so sick of benefits claimants being the scapegoat for what is actually a product of rampant and unfettered capitalism and a government that just simply don’t care about ordinary people.

40somethingme · 02/05/2024 10:57

KingsArmy · 02/05/2024 08:38

The way you have worded this is gloating to me.
I am also a single parent yet I cannot take my kids out to do "nice" things or "treat days" as i work full time yet am in deficit every month. I only see them for a couple of hours a day as im out from 6.45-6pm, 5 days a week. I would qualify for a food bank as I have no money left at all.

Feels very uncomfortable to me that this is your mindset and I ask myself, what and who am I working for? Should I be glad that my taxes have made your kids lives so much better yet my kids have nothing?

Spot on.
many working families with both parents working full time can’t afford days out, nice food, special treats etc. People go into debt to cover Xmas, birthdays and some even live in relative poverty.
Yet people on benefits when questioned about their comfortable lifestyles (who describe themselves as lucky) accuse others of benefit bashing because their children “deserve” days out, comfortable life and shouldn’t live in poverty.
living on benefits should never be as comfortable as working. It should cover the bare minimum like heating, food, modest housing. Not “nice things”.

ToastforTea · 02/05/2024 10:58

Welovecrumpets · 01/05/2024 19:07

It is a lot tbh, and I do understand why those working FT and earning less than that would feel annoyed. But, you’re not doing anything wrong.

You are not doing anything wrong

HOWEVER: to get that much money you’d have to have a gross salary of £66.5k (single earner): which is a fairly high income and should give a comfortable lifestyle

As someone who has never been entitled to any benefits ever, I see a big difference in having to pay for housing vs not

KittyCollar · 02/05/2024 10:59

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:56

@JosiePosey

The problem here is not the benefits for this the family but the fact that it’s extremely hard to earn the same amount. That’s what should change. Workers need to paid properly and fairly. I’m so sick of benefits claimants being the scapegoat for what is actually a product of rampant and unfettered capitalism and a government that just simply don’t care about ordinary people.

Well said

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 11:00

buttnut · 02/05/2024 10:55

I’m used to nasty threads about disabled children in mumsnet but this one has shocked me

Me too. It makes me so sad. I’m wondering if it’s bots rather than people. It’s hard to imagine an actual human being so cold hearted.

buttnut · 02/05/2024 11:00

living on benefits should never be as comfortable as working. It should cover the bare minimum like heating, food, modest housing. Not “nice things”.

But OPs caring for two disabled children. If a parent is a carer for a child/children with additional needs so literally unable to work full-time it would be pretty awful to ensure they cannot afford ‘nice things’ and just live a basic existence with about enough to survive. I don’t see how that’s going to benefit anybody.

Fourgreycats · 02/05/2024 11:01

It’s just extremely sad that the majority of comments on this thread are negative. There are some kind and helpful ones but not enough and that’s a sad reflection of society’s views on those with disabled children.

Blondeshavemorefun · 02/05/2024 11:01

thankyouforthedayz · 01/05/2024 22:24

OP have you got 4 children or 2? Thanks

She's got 2

Not sure why so many posters think she has 4

You can read /highlight all of op posts easily and she says there she has 2

Leah5678 · 02/05/2024 11:04

Wow the lha rate is crazy high where you live. I'm guessing central London? It's only about 700 for a two bed here and I live in the south east.

Giggorata · 02/05/2024 11:05

Earwormed · 01/05/2024 19:14

I mean, if you didn't have disabled kids you wouldn't be claiming half as much and would be able to work more as well. People are almost always poorer if they are on disability benefits as they would be without a family member with a disability. Carers benefit is peanuts and nowhere near in line with the level of work involved, and mean you're limited to how much you can earn so you can't take on any additional work. Disability benefits are not as much as the real costs of the additional money it actual costs. So it's not about being proud of milking the government, it's about not being ashamed of your role as carer, your children's disabilities or claiming what you and they deserve to live. You were also only trying to help somebody else, you weren't trying to flaunt it in somebodies face. I bet they would not think it was so much money if they switched places and realised how difficult it is to stretch that budget with all the additional costs and restrictions on earnings, and how little time you have when you're not working or caring for somebody else. Ignore the person who commented, they obviously lack the social imagination to comprehend circumstances different form their own.

I used to work with children and families, including those with disabilities, and this is in line with what I have observed.

(It is more than I earned at the time, too.)

Weightlosssideeffect · 02/05/2024 11:07

I think it is disgraceful that we’re handing that much out. The rent is absurd.

They're not all owned by people purchasing through a right to buy scheme. For some people that is their pension - all of it, and they’ve saved throughout their career to purchase something that can provide an income for themselves when they potentially can’t work. You should move if you can’t afford the area.

KittyCollar · 02/05/2024 11:07

For posters picking on the OP and her disabled children perhaps you’d prefer this country to bring back the work houses. Lock em all away in there and when you drive past you can look down your noses and it’ll make you feel superior. I couldn’t imagine coping with a disabled child. A child who you know is unlikely to fulfil any potential of living independently. It’s sickening the bile spouted on this thread from the ivory towers of those that have no idea of this kind of suffering. Long term. Not just a brief inconvenience. This is OP’s life and you’re all tearing your hair out with jealousy over money. It’s vile

Soigneur · 02/05/2024 11:09

I was very surprised reading this to discover that child maintenance is not factored in to benefits calculation. Why isn't it just counted as taxed income?

Fourgreycats · 02/05/2024 11:09

KittyCollar · 02/05/2024 11:07

For posters picking on the OP and her disabled children perhaps you’d prefer this country to bring back the work houses. Lock em all away in there and when you drive past you can look down your noses and it’ll make you feel superior. I couldn’t imagine coping with a disabled child. A child who you know is unlikely to fulfil any potential of living independently. It’s sickening the bile spouted on this thread from the ivory towers of those that have no idea of this kind of suffering. Long term. Not just a brief inconvenience. This is OP’s life and you’re all tearing your hair out with jealousy over money. It’s vile

Thankyou. Well said. One of the few voices of reason on here

Nobodyknowsitall5 · 02/05/2024 11:11

It is an eye watering amount but you are entitled to it, so not your fault. If the dad is contributing then I would that you are quite well off.

Vampirelovebite · 02/05/2024 11:11

TheFunHasGone · 02/05/2024 09:43

At her leasure? She's probably either working, catching up on sleep or doing things around the house that she can't get done while the dc are there

Meh most parents have lots that they can't get done when their kids are around, and get less sleep, including those who work full time and have disabled kids (like me). Getting paid to have 7+ hours a day without kids or work is a luxury - let's not pretend otherwise.

WannabeHealthier · 02/05/2024 11:11

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:56

@JosiePosey

The problem here is not the benefits for this the family but the fact that it’s extremely hard to earn the same amount. That’s what should change. Workers need to paid properly and fairly. I’m so sick of benefits claimants being the scapegoat for what is actually a product of rampant and unfettered capitalism and a government that just simply don’t care about ordinary people.

But we’re not productive as a society? Business has a high tax burden. We are in terminal decline unfortunately.

There was an article in the Guardian about coffee shops and what there costs are per £3.50 cup of coffee…

70p goes on VAT, 25p corporation tax, 50p for rent, 27p for coffee beans, 15p for milk, 15p for utilities and 10p for packaging…only 35p goes to wages and that leaves the business with c.£1 profit per cup

Running a business in the U.K. is not for the faint hearted- it’s a cost minimisation exercise. Then we have employees on extended sick leave - another massively increased cost for business in recent years (partly this is due to lack of investment in public health/NHS … so the government is partly to blame here). It’s stressful and unattractive trying to turn a profit and grow a business in these conditions.

Part of the reason why wages are low is that we’re not producing enough economic output per person… we simply are not bringing in enough cash to the economy. Our welfare state is creaking under the weight of an ageing population and increasing ill health and levels of disability (including huge growth in mental health illness and neurodiversity).

Unfortunately we do need to do something about this regardless how palatable it is. We can’t go on spending without filling our coffers.

Big business not paying their fair share is only one issue- there are plenty of smaller businesses that pay so much money to the government - it would be better directed to their employees. But until we reduce our tax burden nothing will change. It’s such a sad state of affairs for all of us.

Twins3007 · 02/05/2024 11:12

WithACatLikeTread · 01/05/2024 19:36

What is your motive for this thread?
That rent is rediculous.

the rent is an average rent in our area for a 3 bed HA house, no more cheap council rent,

AllTheChaos · 02/05/2024 11:13

Thatcher’s sell off of council houses has cost this country a fortune. People that would have had secure, lifetime tenancies, with low rents, are now in often unfit for purpose private rentals, without security, and having to pay an absolute fortune in private rent. So much benefit money is then just funnelled to private landlords. THAT is the scandal.

IWantOut29 · 02/05/2024 11:16

KingsArmy · 02/05/2024 10:28

The argument of they didn't ask to be born like this is a wasted one on me....did any of us ask to be born?

You've changed your gloating thread to one of pity and difficulty since I called you out on it.
Unfortunately that also doesn't wash with me, my son has a diagnosis (quite what good that does I'm still to ascertain), has tried to kill himself, been put into care due to violence etc etc, it's not a competition on whose life is/has been worse. I dont deserve a high financial reward because of my sons difficulties when I'm not putting anything back into society.

The crux of the issue and my comment is that the op is effectively bringing home well over 50k a year, and you were telling us how your kids get to do nice treats and go on fun days out a few times a month!

My response is, when I am at the thinnest edge of the wedge financially, am a single parent, don't see my kids, don't do fun days out - who and what am I working for? Is your kids happiness more important than mine?

Your working family members taxes are not ring fenced to support you and you alone, but if this makes you feel better about the situation then go for it. The reality is if my taxes aren't helping give your kids the nice life you merrily describe then they are enabling it for someone else.....at the expense of my own children. How you can see that as a fair scenario is beyond me.

The system is broken.

Edited

Have a re read of the definetition of gloating. There was no smugness in any of my post, just relief that my children have a smidge if happiness and dont live in poverty.

My DD has had so much counselling due to the self harming and threats of suicide she has made. If I wanted sympathy I would of gone into far greater detail about her.

What does a fun day out consist of for you? Because for us it's being able to have a picnic at the local park and have some treat foods... or maybe they have seen a magazine or a small cheap toy in the shop that they would like. It isnt every day, nor every week. Its maybe two or three times a month. DS went to the cinema for his birthday, which is a month before Christmas so it's a squeeze. Their hardly going to expensive activities or weekly clubs

Why are you so angry at a family of people with additional needs, claiming what the government has decided they can claim

Instead of being angry at the government for making your wage so little your struggling?

Why would you want to drag another family down to your level instead of asking the government to change things so that your life is better too? I never said it was fair, at all, I said I feel very lucky.

If the shoe was on the other foot I would not be angry at the family needing to claim benefits, I'd be more angry at the government and what their doing to everyone.

Your right it isnt fair and I'm sorry your struggling, I would hate to be in that situation. But that's not my fault and I did not Make the rules. If I did make the rules, your and my children would all have a better quality of life and so would working people

My sister is due her first baby this year and I cant believe working people arnt allowed the £500 maternity grant. That's appalling. I dont feel smug that I got it and my sister cant. I feel really bad that she works so hard and has put so much into the system yet cant get a grant to help with her first child.

No smugness or gloating from me, just relief that that my chuldren will have a nicer childhood than they would if we didnt get help.

Randommother · 02/05/2024 11:17

Janjk · 02/05/2024 10:35

I have written to my MP about the ridiculous situation where maintenance payments are not taken into account in this situation. OP's refusal to disclose whether she gets maintenance payments crystallised my thinking on this. I was unaware of it before. Either she doesn't get maintenance payments, in which case if the father is earning he should be contributing, or she does and her payments should be adjusted accordingly.

It's a disgraceful state of affairs and I urge all of you hard taxpayers struggling to make ends meet to do the same. Make it known that this is not ok.

This. The refusal from the OP to answer the question speaks volumes in itself.

Crikeyalmighty · 02/05/2024 11:18

@AllTheChaos absolutely.

AllTheChaos · 02/05/2024 11:19

Leah5678 · 02/05/2024 11:04

Wow the lha rate is crazy high where you live. I'm guessing central London? It's only about 700 for a two bed here and I live in the south east.

Definitely not central London! It’s higher here in zone 2! And still won’t actually get you a two bed flat (actual rent of a two bed flat here is about £1,800 a month plus bills)

KittyCollar · 02/05/2024 11:19

AllTheChaos · 02/05/2024 11:13

Thatcher’s sell off of council houses has cost this country a fortune. People that would have had secure, lifetime tenancies, with low rents, are now in often unfit for purpose private rentals, without security, and having to pay an absolute fortune in private rent. So much benefit money is then just funnelled to private landlords. THAT is the scandal.

Precisely.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.