Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Do you feel bad for receiving a ‘high amount’ of UC?

1000 replies

AnotherNameChange1233 · 01/05/2024 18:53

Last week I went to my local Children’s Centre and attended a Citizen’s Advice group that runs once a week.

As long as you’re registered to the Children Centre, you can turn up for any advice needed. Some people want privacy so they go into a side room with the advisor and some parents may help other parents if they’ve been in a similar situation/can offer the correct advice. It’s also like a social group for parents, hopefully you get the jist of it.

On the table I was sitting on, one parent was trying to get her head around UC as she didn’t quite understand LHA rates, how DLA impacts UC and what elements she would be entitled too. Anyway, I started speaking about my experience with DLA, UC and offered to log into my UC account if it was easier for her to look at the breakdown visually (instead of me talking and complicating things). I also got her postcode to explain how the LHA rates work and etc.

Another parent suddenly spoke up and said, ‘don’t you feel bad for claiming that much money?’ She wasn’t argumentative or anything and we had an interesting conversation but it made me think, are people like me supposed to feel bad when receiving a certain amount?

She also said something like (I’m paraphrasing here as I can’t remember it exactly word for word) if people can’t afford their rent then they should move to a more affordable area. I raised the point of Landlords purchasing properties as part of the Right to Buy scheme, charging extortionate rent which taxpayers then pay through UC. Surely, it’s more a problem that there isn’t affordable rental properties in many areas.

For full transparency, I’m going to mention all of my UC amounts and wonder if people that claim similar, feel bad?

  • 292 single person allowance
  • 1450 private rent
  • 539 for 2 children
  • 293 for 2 disabled children
  • 589 childcare costs
  • 189 carer

£216 is deducted from my entitlement due to my wages. That means my UC amount is £3133. My wages is £771. I receive two amounts of MRC through DLA which is £580 all together.

Now that I’ve written it down, it seems like a whole lot of money but the costs that come with raising one of my disabled children (the other still costs a lot, but not as much as the other) is through the roof due to their issues

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Efh · 02/05/2024 10:33

Idontfinkso · 02/05/2024 10:26

Jesus Christ! I’m gobsmacked by the amount. Why our some of us mugs working FT if we can get these amounts of money???
I would say I have always defended the benefits system, and paid a lot of tax, but I might have to rethink it.
We stopped at 2 kids because of £££.
This can’t be the norm, can it?
My dad was always going on about people claiming loads on benefits etc, I thought he was just being bigoted. Maybe not.

I don't know if you have missed this part, but one of OP's dc has Down's syndrome.

A major part of her benefits relates to private rent of £1450pcm- from a landlord that purchased OP's home under the right to buy scheme and instead of living in it as intended, rents it out. That's the immoral part.

OP is on her own with 2 disabled dc, she works.

mitogoshi · 02/05/2024 10:35

I understand that you are raising two disabled children however that does sound incredibly generous when people working full time are earning less and need to pay rent and childcare from their earnings. DLA is different as you can claim that in work. I would advise not to be so open in real life as it will breed resentment from those who are struggling to cope with working far more hours raising children. I also don't understand how you can work and get carers - I lost my carers allowance when I went back to part time work.

Janjk · 02/05/2024 10:35

I have written to my MP about the ridiculous situation where maintenance payments are not taken into account in this situation. OP's refusal to disclose whether she gets maintenance payments crystallised my thinking on this. I was unaware of it before. Either she doesn't get maintenance payments, in which case if the father is earning he should be contributing, or she does and her payments should be adjusted accordingly.

It's a disgraceful state of affairs and I urge all of you hard taxpayers struggling to make ends meet to do the same. Make it known that this is not ok.

MrsAncunin · 02/05/2024 10:37

mitogoshi · 02/05/2024 10:35

I understand that you are raising two disabled children however that does sound incredibly generous when people working full time are earning less and need to pay rent and childcare from their earnings. DLA is different as you can claim that in work. I would advise not to be so open in real life as it will breed resentment from those who are struggling to cope with working far more hours raising children. I also don't understand how you can work and get carers - I lost my carers allowance when I went back to part time work.

OP won't get carers allowance as she earns over the threshold however she will get carers element on UC which has no threshold of earnings so if you have a family member on DLA/PIP then you should also be able to claim the carers element (however do be aware it's not a protected element and wages can wipe it out if earning too much).

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:38

Janjk · 02/05/2024 10:35

I have written to my MP about the ridiculous situation where maintenance payments are not taken into account in this situation. OP's refusal to disclose whether she gets maintenance payments crystallised my thinking on this. I was unaware of it before. Either she doesn't get maintenance payments, in which case if the father is earning he should be contributing, or she does and her payments should be adjusted accordingly.

It's a disgraceful state of affairs and I urge all of you hard taxpayers struggling to make ends meet to do the same. Make it known that this is not ok.

Surely there are more pressing issues? Like looking at the reasons for the need for benefits in the first place? Addressing the shameful inequality in this country? Tackling climate change? Do you write to your MP about NHS waiting lists? The state of elderly care?

saturnspinkhoop · 02/05/2024 10:38

Inyourgarden · 02/05/2024 08:54

This is a genuine question, what extra costs do you incur due to your kid having autism?

Hope you don’t mind, but I’d like to chip in here. Extra costs for me include:- private therapies, extra uniform and clothing, increased washing, a pushchair, greatly increased food bill, extra costs for therapy type items, extra cleaning items, travel to appointments, costs for books so I can learn more… that’s just off the top of my head. My earnings are greatly reduced as well.
Obviously this won’t be exactly the same for all parents of Autistic children.

40somethingme · 02/05/2024 10:38

Beezknees · 02/05/2024 08:05

This is ridiculous because most people claiming are single parents, most people don't plan to become single parents.

Considering that 50% of marriages end in divorce people should absolutely plan for the possibility of becoming a single parent. Not hope for the best that when shit happens the taxpayers will pick up the bill (quite often already covered by the other parent but excluded from benefit calculation).
There is no excuse to treat all single parents as victims of circumstances beyond their control.

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:40

TheFunHasGone · 02/05/2024 09:45

Who is going on to have more children?

People that find themselves in poverty and using food banks etc that then go on to have another child.

If someone is in that situation, and chooses to have another, they shouldn't receive anything from that state for that child because having another when you can't provide for the child/ren you have is just irresponsible.

Although by the looks of it, a life on bens isn't the poverty stricken life we are led to believe it is. Especially when this amount of money is dished out and there are free school meals, free meals dished out in the holidays, school uniform grants, childcare paid for, that doesn't need to come out the cash people are given.

Julen7 · 02/05/2024 10:40

Janjk · 02/05/2024 10:35

I have written to my MP about the ridiculous situation where maintenance payments are not taken into account in this situation. OP's refusal to disclose whether she gets maintenance payments crystallised my thinking on this. I was unaware of it before. Either she doesn't get maintenance payments, in which case if the father is earning he should be contributing, or she does and her payments should be adjusted accordingly.

It's a disgraceful state of affairs and I urge all of you hard taxpayers struggling to make ends meet to do the same. Make it known that this is not ok.

i hadn’t realised either and I’m going to do the same right now (write to MP)

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:40

mitogoshi · 02/05/2024 10:35

I understand that you are raising two disabled children however that does sound incredibly generous when people working full time are earning less and need to pay rent and childcare from their earnings. DLA is different as you can claim that in work. I would advise not to be so open in real life as it will breed resentment from those who are struggling to cope with working far more hours raising children. I also don't understand how you can work and get carers - I lost my carers allowance when I went back to part time work.

Or we stop viewing caring (which largely falls to women) as not working! She works at looking after two disabled children. Who would step in if she didn’t and how much would that cost the state. Why should those children live in poverty because they have disabilities through no fault of their own? What would we do instead? Just let those kids suffer?

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:42

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:40

Or we stop viewing caring (which largely falls to women) as not working! She works at looking after two disabled children. Who would step in if she didn’t and how much would that cost the state. Why should those children live in poverty because they have disabilities through no fault of their own? What would we do instead? Just let those kids suffer?

She hasn't been given these random children to care for out of her own pocket, these are her own children that she chose to have, why should paying for them fall to others?

Paying for them and caring for them is her and the fathers responsibility, and theirs alone.

Why is she lauded as a hero and have cash thrown at her for looking after her own kids?

buttnut · 02/05/2024 10:44

brightyellowflower · 02/05/2024 10:19

I'm not shocked because I've always known that people on benefits are recieving much much more money than people working hard.

I am appalled tbh and think that you should never receive more money on benefits than you should working and paying for your own rent/bills/childcare. That's just my take.

Needs a serious overhaul.

if you are caring for disabled children then i don’t think it’s a problem 🤷‍♀️

saturnspinkhoop · 02/05/2024 10:44

Child Maintenance payments (as I understand it) aren’t taken into account because if a parent suddenly stopped paying, the child would be in a v tricky situation.

KittyCollar · 02/05/2024 10:45

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:40

People that find themselves in poverty and using food banks etc that then go on to have another child.

If someone is in that situation, and chooses to have another, they shouldn't receive anything from that state for that child because having another when you can't provide for the child/ren you have is just irresponsible.

Although by the looks of it, a life on bens isn't the poverty stricken life we are led to believe it is. Especially when this amount of money is dished out and there are free school meals, free meals dished out in the holidays, school uniform grants, childcare paid for, that doesn't need to come out the cash people are given.

Well it’s not the kids’ fault is it. Why shouldn’t they be fed and looked after.

Mybusyday · 02/05/2024 10:45

Cadela · 01/05/2024 19:53

Between UC and PIP I get just over £2.6k a month.

I’d quite happily give someone my uncontrolled epilepsy so I can go back to work or even leave the house without having a seizure! Any takers?

This is what people need to understand. People on benefits get a raw deal in terms of peoples opinions. Benefits are there for a reason

LadyKenya · 02/05/2024 10:46

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:40

People that find themselves in poverty and using food banks etc that then go on to have another child.

If someone is in that situation, and chooses to have another, they shouldn't receive anything from that state for that child because having another when you can't provide for the child/ren you have is just irresponsible.

Although by the looks of it, a life on bens isn't the poverty stricken life we are led to believe it is. Especially when this amount of money is dished out and there are free school meals, free meals dished out in the holidays, school uniform grants, childcare paid for, that doesn't need to come out the cash people are given.

In an ideal world that would not happen, and people would not have children that they cannot afford. We do not live in an ideal world. Why should the children in these cases suffer? And always remember that people's circumstances can change, just like that! Anyone who could begrudge children being provided with the basics, because of the situation of the parents, imo, are sorry people.

SpideyVerse · 02/05/2024 10:46

Anonymous2025 · 02/05/2024 08:36

I think people need to educate themselves. If op worked more the children would need more time in a setting other than home , probably sen school , now those places cost the LA often more than £46000 a year , so that wouldn’t be 92k alone plus probably transport so way over 100k . As they grow that cost would highly increase . Do you not understand how using parents as carers is the cheapest way to the government ? Do you really think the government would be loosing money ? Unless you are all blaming the OP for having disabled children which is nothing more than pure Ableism .

This.

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:48

meatyryvita · 02/05/2024 10:32

You should not feel in the slightest bit guilty. That financial safety net is there for the people that need it. It's hardly likely that this government errs on the side of generosity and so an assessment has been carried out and it's been determined that you NEED this.

Why is NMW and the living wage such a pittance in comparision then, if this is whatis NEEDED to live off?

Figures for non-disabled children are also disgraceful, in terms of what is given compared to what the average wage is. It seems a life on bens pays.

betterangels · 02/05/2024 10:50

Coramac · 01/05/2024 20:00

@TheFunHasGone how dare you point fingers at me. You know nothing about me other than I'm knackered after a 12 hour day.

I'm absolutely shocked at this figure and I have every right to be. I feel like just jacking it all in. I'm knackered and have had enough.

I don't blame you. It's pretty shocking.

LondonFox · 02/05/2024 10:52

AnotherNameChange1233 · 01/05/2024 23:31

I haven’t dodged the question. I have very clear said that I will not be answering the question at all. It truly has nothing to do with my original post. This is the last time I’ll even acknowledge this

People are asking because you are receiving batshit crazy mount of money from taxpayers.
People working for average salary of half your benefits support their children. It is completelly unreasonable that you are paid that much.
It would be more feesable to send you to work for 65k you claim you can rack and provide you with 8h od free daycare for your disabled children.

Makes me wonder if you still live with dad, claim to be single and have joint household income of 100k if he works any average job.
It is insane.

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:53

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:42

She hasn't been given these random children to care for out of her own pocket, these are her own children that she chose to have, why should paying for them fall to others?

Paying for them and caring for them is her and the fathers responsibility, and theirs alone.

Why is she lauded as a hero and have cash thrown at her for looking after her own kids?

Edited

Jesus Christ. I have no words. That is one of the cruelest things I’ve ever read on here. Please describe what you think should happen and what impact that would have on those children.

TomeTome · 02/05/2024 10:53

JosiePosey · 02/05/2024 10:48

Why is NMW and the living wage such a pittance in comparision then, if this is whatis NEEDED to live off?

Figures for non-disabled children are also disgraceful, in terms of what is given compared to what the average wage is. It seems a life on bens pays.

Edited

@JosiePosey are they? Can you provide those figures so we can compare?

I really think you are underestimating how expensive raising a child with disability is.

BrightLightTonight · 02/05/2024 10:53

viques · 02/05/2024 09:40

And if the OP was not caring for her children and they were in SS care they might cost up to £1,000 a week , each. So £8,000 a month. Want to do the maths?

I will do it for you as you seem to be hard of thinking. £416,000 a year.

Plus extra of course if they need hospital care which for example is often the case with children with severe disabilities where compromised movement leads to recurring chest infections, not to mention infections or problems with feeding tubes, picc lines, trachy tubes etc etc. Having a vigilant parent doing 1-1 care can often prevent extended hospital admissions.

OP and the other parents and carers who are doing the heavy lifting ( literally in many cases - back problems for carers are commonplace) are actually saving the irate tax payers on this thread billions of pounds a year. And in the meantime they are often compromising their own mental and physical health, their career prospects, their social lives……….

And for those asking why the OP doesn’t move to a cheaper rented property try searching for rented properties with full motorised wheelchair access, a wet room, space for storing equipment, hoists, specialised beds etc, if you think finding a rented property is difficult try finding one that offers adaptations for a child with disabilities who will grow into an adult with disabilities.

Your maths is out - £2,000 per week * 52 weeks = 104,000 per year

Wherearewegoing · 02/05/2024 10:54

betterangels · 02/05/2024 10:50

I don't blame you. It's pretty shocking.

Do either of you have two disabled children to look after?

buttnut · 02/05/2024 10:55

I’m used to nasty threads about disabled children in mumsnet but this one has shocked me

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.