Attributing arbitrary values to what you think a person should get paid is meaningless when that person does not have to compete with anyone else or demonstrate value for money in order to get their pay packet.
In every other aspect of the economy, people get paid proportionally to the amount of value they bring to society, and those values are established in a competitive environment where the customer determines the value of the service they receive and can vote with their pocket book if they believe they are not getting fair value for money.
However, you are advocating that those holding a monopoly position and already receiving the highest pay packets in the land should be entitled to more money regardless of whether they provide value for money or not. Not withstanding their squandering of £180Billions on a piss poor service.
Every single one of them has the opportunity to compete, like for like, with similar professionals anywhere in the world, and many do. The average GP salary in the UAE for example is £38Kpa, one of the richest and most well equipped countries in the world.
But then there is no Government mandated monopoly in play in the UAE, and doctors have to compete based on the value they bring to the job, rather than just what they feel like.
I’d suggest that privatisation would be one way of lowering the payroll costs, and expelling all the waste expenditure from the system. Let’s face it, a private healthcare system couldn’t possible be any slower that the current system. Doctors pay is just one example of excessive renumeration and waste in the NHS machine.