I topped my EV up to 100% last night, from the 67% it was sitting on. I only have 4 hours cheap each night, so if it was completely empty it would take 3 nights to get back to full. And it would cost just over a fiver. In return for my 7.5p night rate, I pay 40.9p the rest of the time - while the standard tariff is 28p. Now my tariff is fixed, so in October my 40.9p will also look very cheap. But that’s what can happen when you choose to take a fixed rate - my Mum is on a 2-year fix paying less than 3p for gas and 17p for electricity, nothing to do with EV’s.
The car told me this morning that it could do 353 miles on its full battery. I’ve actually driven 113 miles today, and now my car is telling me that with its remaining 70% battery it can do 241 miles - so pretty much spot on.
£5 for 353 miles - 1.4p per mile. Actually, less than that, because a fair chunk of my charging came from my solar panels. No carbon emissions from the non-existent tail-pipe, not many (though some) producing the power to charge it, less brake dust than an ICE car thanks to regenerative braking, similar or possibly more tyre particulates (though that is debatable).
Yes, it cost a lot to buy - more than my previous diesel car. But over its lifetime it will cost a lot less to own and run. And the solar panels and battery cost a lot to buy as well - but have cut my electricity bill by 70%.
If people have money, are they wrong for using it to make their own lives better - and incidentally contribute to better air quality and reduced carbon emissions, which benefit everyone?
It is not EV drivers who have decided that only EV drivers can get these tariffs - that’s the suppliers’ decision. It’s not EV drivers who have decided that Tesco will provide free charging - that’s Tescos’ decision. Should EV drivers not take advantage of what is being freely offered?