Oooh I have missed a bit of an argy bargy!!!
My view on MMR is coloured by my family history:
My Mum was offered Thalidamide when PG with my older sister and told by the NHS it was perfectly safe.
My younger sister, who suffered from asthma and excsma [sp?] wasn't given any jabs as in 1970's, babies with poor immune systems were deemed at risk of being damaged by jabs.
This wisdom dissappeared when the Government bought in some of the more recent mega vaccination regimes (and anyone who thinks these decisions are not polluted by the influence of money from big vaccine manufacturers is naive).
The government have had to pay compensation to a small number of families whose children have been damaged by MMR - fact. But they try to keep it quiet as they don't want people NOT to vaccinate - for very good sound reasons (herd immunity etc).
The children who are at risk are children who have poor immune systems, whose systems cannot cope with the overload of having multiple jabs (like MMR). And of course boys are much more vulnerable.
Everyone has to make their choice, but realistically its probably only children with poor immune systems who are at risk of being damaged by MMR - or children who have had bad reactions to vaccinations.
I choose the single job on the basis that my Mum was told to take Thalidamide and also because I know three families who beleive their children were permenantly damaged by MMR. None of the families are litigious and none are taking any action, nor are they recorded anywhere as the NHS doesn't accept a link between MMR and autism/regressive behaviour/fits/epilepsy.
..........hey, wake up everyone!!!!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz