@2021ivfagain With my last cycle, I had six blasts - so, I tested. Because of the way CRGH expect you to pay for up to eight blasts, I'm not willing to test a single blast (obviously). I think the Day 6 blast is a B something. I was told all the three embryos were excellent quality at Day 3.
To be honest, I don't monitor embryo quality because my situation is so obviously due to implantation issues. I had six morphologically-normal blasts, aged 39, from seven eggs, and one of them was chromosome normal, and that was my first IVF cycle. However, I've only been pregnant twice in ten years, once by IVF, and you'd expect my egg quality to be declining by 39, so it's obvious that my problem, aged 33, wasn't with early embryo development. Or, even, for that matter, with later embryo development because I never got pregnant, miscarried, or even missed a period for three years before DS1.
I'm considering, quite seriously, not bothering with IVF further TBH. We were doing IVF due to my age, because my infertility is unexplained, and to schedule embryo transfer to when I've had recent immune treatment. The problem is that, with two kids, I can't afford to be sick all the time, it turns out that it's extremely difficult to control my disease over more than one egg collection, and I've now got a bunch of gynae problems caused by IVF. So, I don't know whether to just try to sort out the cysts, get a prescription for Prednisone from Dr Gorgy, and try naturally. If I can generate one normal blast from three eggs, the likelihood of me conceiving naturally, if I can control my disease, is probably decent for a 42 year old - and there are several mums with kids in DS1's year who've given birth at my age.