Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Times article about Mumsnet's evil streak

377 replies

NorkyButNice · 14/02/2010 07:54

I wonder which former devotee wrote this?

No such thing as bad publicity? Or does it make us look like a bunch of beeeatches?

OP posts:
noddyholder · 14/02/2010 12:19

Well most of the public who are just reading the paper are not highly informed re journalism etc

Bonsoir · 14/02/2010 12:19

DuelingFanjo - yes, you are completely right.

Tortington · 14/02/2010 12:19

I understand you think that this article is a plant. Backed up by the fact that "there is a whacking great picture of Justine at the top of the article (major giveaway) "

I don't agree that this is any kind of proof that MNHQ are in some kind of conspiritorial Journalism quest to distance themselves from 'Bitches' the likes of Athene and Quattro ( two great posters)

I simply don't agree with you therefore i find your argument has no substance. Your counterargument that i just don't understand is poor.

I disagree, this is clearly much different.

pooexplosionsareimproving · 14/02/2010 12:19

Uppity women talking about politics and not continually hugging each other? Our bad, not.

foxinsocks · 14/02/2010 12:20

lol

but you all disagree so nicely

anyway, none of us have been invited to the party the fuckers unless custy has?

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:20

ta-dah! yes, i've been invited... still seeing if i can do it, childcare and the dredded monday wirk deadline render it tricky. i didn't get an actual invitation though, just an email, i would have PMSL if i'd seen the origami thing. i was invited as a 'contributor' because i've been doing the tv thingies for the newsletter, so i'd hazard that the others from that will as well.

funny old piece, that, i think. i really don't see this place as any more or less bitchy than when i came on here. i've seen worse, like Much Worse, on smaller sites, because the hounding can be more overwhelming. here, all it takes is for one person to go 'hang on a mo, this is a bit unfair' and a crowd of lurkers come out in agreement. that's kinda why i've no time for moaning about bullying. if you see it, stick up for the poor person on the thread At The Time, cos that's when they really need it. writing an article about it after the fact just seems a bit self-indulgent and whiny to me.

mind you, like norah says, i know a few good pals who just don't 'get' the tone on here... and so they post elsewhere. no big deal, room on the internet broom and all that.

Bonsoir · 14/02/2010 12:20

I'm sure your alternative party will be delightful, violethill.

Which papers/journos will be covering it?

AngeChica · 14/02/2010 12:21

.

I agree with the sentiment behind this article. AIBU in particular has turned really horrible of late.

The Mumsnet hardcore put me in mind of the girls at school who were all bigger and more popular and had nice hair. Picking on the chavs (Netmums) and geeks.

.

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:24

aibu is BY FAR the grimmest thing on the site and i rue the day they ever introduced it. i'd ditch it altogether, it was much nicer when people used to call for an MN Jury type thing. but mnhq never will, because it's such an (inexplicably) popular part of the site.

Tortington · 14/02/2010 12:26

AIBU = jerry springer.

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:26

oh yes and i hate all that chav shit and the names threads which always upset people. it's just vile. not emblematic of the whole site (and in my case i hide them) but not our finest hour.

noddyholder · 14/02/2010 12:26

I didn't know there was a party Whats it for?

Bonsoir · 14/02/2010 12:27

Aitch - my explanation for AIBU is that (some) posters want to be given free rein to let loose. They know they have to be (more or less) polite most of the time on MN - AIBU allows them to stone throw at posters they would like to be ruder to in general (for whatever reason).

It's the modern face of a public stoning. Grrrrrr. So uncivilised.

foxinsocks · 14/02/2010 12:28

it's for journos and those who publicise the site

and I reckon a few chosen posters who no-one is helping me guess lol

and 10 people who can write good haikus

yes I agree re AIBU. You can't judge the site by that topic Ange. Most other topics quite good (other than names and feeding - I never look at either)

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:29

totally, custy. it's a bear pit. but then, as the tabloids would say, if people are buying it...

noddyholder · 14/02/2010 12:29

Oh ok x

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:30

yyy also agree bonsoir. it's so primitive.

piratecat · 14/02/2010 12:30

'What dismays me is how cliquey and spiteful some users of the website have become'

yes 'some' out of 850,000.

' That is how some of us who love the site are beginning to feel'

yes 'some' out of 850,000

'It?s not the place, for instance, to admit to any problem with your offspring if you work long hours. '

maybe you?

the journo that wrote this is moaning about it, making money out of it but is going to the party, but doesn't want to go to the party?

classic mumsnet.

Methusalah · 14/02/2010 12:31

There are some people on here who are in danger of beleiving their own publicity, as in they think they matter and because they perceive themselves as mattering and having tenure that their opinions count. Tenure doesn't count for Jack.

This is a business and fairs dues to Justine and Carrie for making it work

Tortington · 14/02/2010 12:31

I don't know why people would start a post there.

Then i don't know why people would volunteer to go on national tv and talk about how there mum shagged their boyfriend

Bumperlicious · 14/02/2010 12:32

Bonsoir, I understand what you are saying, I just disagree, like Custy.

Riven. doesn't the comp finish tomorrow? It's just not stickied any more (to discourage the riff raff ).

Thought so aitch, it's a bit of a trek for you. Moi, on the other hand, just 2 hours on the train. I'm going for numbers on the haiku thread! Hedging my bets . I even looked on the Boden site - all a bit bleh though isn't it?

I was gutted as I was invited to the book launch for the BLW book but couldn't make it due to work. Never been to a fancy literary party before (though it was BYOB - bring your own baby - so probably not that fancy!).

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 14/02/2010 12:32

'It?s not the place, for instance, to admit to any problem with your offspring if you work long hours. '

i know, that was a bizarre one. the whole PLACE is about problems with offspring, some of which may be caused by parents working long hours, some of which aren't. chickenpox a problem, lice a problem, causal link to parental career commitments... unlikely.

violethill · 14/02/2010 12:33

Who the fuck reads the Sunday Times anyway?

Oh yeah, the sort of people who want to go to the party.

electra · 14/02/2010 12:33

I think the bitchiness was the same when I joined in 2004.....in fact I think at times it was worse.

Kaloki · 14/02/2010 12:34

What's great is that any one of us could write a much longer article detailing all the useful supportive threads on here, however that wouldn't make it into a paper would it?