Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Number 10 petition to criminalise men who buy sex

461 replies

policywonk · 27/01/2010 17:03

Sign here if, you know, you want to

OP posts:
TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 15:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 15:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

StayFrosty · 08/02/2010 15:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 15:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

dittany · 08/02/2010 15:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 16:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 16:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

TheShriekingHarpy · 08/02/2010 16:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

dittany · 08/02/2010 16:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 08/02/2010 16:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

StayFrosty · 08/02/2010 16:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 08/02/2010 16:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AitchTwoOhOneOh · 08/02/2010 17:07

"By TheShriekingHarpy Mon 08-Feb-10 12:54:13
""her point was that the most vulnerable will fall through the regulated cracks as well""

Yes and thats why, I stipulated earlier on, that sex workers should be offered the opportunity to move away from solicitation. This could be achieved through the implementation of a schemes which enable prostitutes to resolve any drug dependency issues, offer vocational training, counseling etc."

thing is, though, tsh, you're already dealing with damaged people by that point, women who have already been abused by men. i'd be delighted for them to receive help, of course, but i see no reason as to why that support shouldn't be available to women even as the men who want to pay to fuck them are criminalised. it's not one option or the other, surely, that doesn't make a bit of sense.

bigger picture, though, as i see it, is that part of the reason why so many men are able to damage women with such ease is because prostitution, lap dancing clubs, even stupid adverts about career women all combine to indicate to them that we are lesser beings.

just telling them that no, actually, they can't transact in our bodies without becoming criminals i think would be an important step forward for society. it's quite a ship to turn around, and there will be casualties as there are casualties with the current system, but it cannot be good for women and for men to have it constantly broadcast that women's bodies are for sale and that our society is absolutely okay with that.

dawntigga · 08/02/2010 17:19

No

scottishmummy · 08/02/2010 19:08

dittany dont presume to interpret my motives or twist my words.just because one does not concur with you does not merit singling me out or presuming "i dont care about whores"(your words)

so you are exasperated at no response ,that are posted.do you plan to single out other respondents and assert they dont care about whores

i gave a fine example of not wishing to sign a petition,by asserting no. don't stretch that to fit your other spurious claims

LeninGrad · 08/02/2010 19:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 08/02/2010 19:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

StayFrosty · 08/02/2010 19:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scottishmummy · 08/02/2010 19:53

my one word no is declining to sign the petition - answer to the op

dittany,you have the hump because people dont agree with you,and so are attempting to make inferences and assumptions

grown's up are able to accept divergent opinions,without resorting to assumptions

do you plan to chase everyone else who said no around the thread

dittany · 08/02/2010 20:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scottishmummy · 08/02/2010 20:17

again you get it wrong.i read op and posted,the random order of my post is just that random.you seem determined to stretch some spurious point or read significance when there is none

again do you plan to chase all the other posters who said no around the thread

dittany · 08/02/2010 20:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scottishmummy · 08/02/2010 20:21

do you plan to chase all the other posters who said no around the thread

dittany · 08/02/2010 20:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scottishmummy · 08/02/2010 20:31

"ScottishMummy I singled you out..." have you employed the same vigour to other no responses

as i said read op and posted,the position of post was just that random.you erroneously took it as direct response to your post

Swipe left for the next trending thread