Can I ask what does the expression 'freedom of speech' actually mean to people? Do poeple agreee/not agree that it is a privilege not a right, and has limits.
Or do you believe it's automatic and has no limits.
I think people only start passionately defending peoples right to freedom of speech when actually it's something they want to hear even if its vile.
For e.g. Some paedophiles believe they are born with those desires and should have the right to speak about it. Would anyone defend their right to debate/speak for paedophilia as a legitimate sexual preference?
What about murders, rapists, I don't know anything.
My point is should freedom of speech ever have limits and if not why do you think not?
Just trying to understand those in favour of BNP being on QT.