My two pennies worth:
I was glad it took place. I don't think a broadcaster has the right to decide whether or not we hear the views of a democratically elected party.
Equally, I was glad those protesters turned out. I would have been sad if nobody had protested about it. Democracy works both ways.
Thoght Griffin came across as wooly, confused and fairly dim, which I was pleased about. Obviously not used to having to argue his point - probably because he hasnt been involved in QT type debates - or any genuine political debate, really - and is only used to preaching to the converted at his sordid little party meetings.
I wished the other panelists had been more rigorous in their critiques of the BNP's policies, rather than trying to score political points by talking about their own 'wonderful' policies all the time (rather naive of me, I suppose).
I thought the questions / comments from the audience were weak. Wished some more intelligent, reasoned debate had taken place (guess it's hard for people to contain their venom when they are just a few feet away from such a fascist bastard).
I thought Baronness Warsi made some great points (for a Tory!) but went right off her when Dimbleby exposed her as anti-civil partnerships. Limiting the rights of gay people is Ok, then, is it?
I am always disappointed with Bonnie Greer on these types of shows. Great writer/thinker, but unsuited to this type of quick-fire debate. She always waffles and doesn't make any strong points.
And finally: He is even worst scum than I had suspected. I spit on everything he stands for. I would actually rather the Tories got in by taking votes from the disaffected voters who would otherwise vote for the BNP. And it takes a lot for me - a true lefty - to say that.