Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

WTF is she thinking?

112 replies

TheLadyEvenstar · 28/04/2009 10:57

Talk about over feeding your dc

OP posts:
WaynettaSlobb · 30/04/2009 13:20

aawwwww she has braaawn babies

Nancy66 · 30/04/2009 14:08

I saw her on telly the other day and she clealy has a very low IQ ...it said that dieticians were working with her, so fingers crossed it does some good.

Clearly she needs help as she also told the presenter that she gives the babies tea in a bottle as it's good for them....Jeez louise.

wasabipeanut · 30/04/2009 14:14

Jesus christ what a state.

She needs help and if after that she is still incapable of looking after her children properly they should be looked after by somebody else.

hifi · 30/04/2009 14:45

the babies are beautiful. who the hell had sex with her at 40 stone and how?

Peachy · 30/04/2009 14:55

ahem

Much as I hate Dr JH didnt he state on GMTV that they were right weight for height?

And that she ahd lost many stone?

So although obese doing ehr best?

Nancy66 · 30/04/2009 15:18

yep - she'd lost 10 stone since having them (although wasn't clear if the 40 stone was her full term pregnancy weight)

and kids aren't overweight...yet.

Eve4Walle · 30/04/2009 15:25

Disgraceful.

Hope she's getting some help now.

Peachy · 30/04/2009 16:17

Well nancy if that's the case then I do think some support would be far better than the ridicule she ahs received here- 10 stones is a massive achievemnt in itself isn't it?

Nancy66 · 30/04/2009 19:05

Not if 8 stone of that was triplets...

chequersmate · 30/04/2009 22:09

8 stone triplets?

Wtf?

GivePeasAChance · 30/04/2009 22:13

I feel dirty having looked at that

Quattrocento · 30/04/2009 22:14

Clearly, the woman is a freak

But should we be goggling at the freak show?

SnortyBartFast · 30/04/2009 22:16

lol waynetta

Jaquelinehyde · 30/04/2009 22:36

WTF is that with the braaawn babies comment?

A hideous beast?

Listen to you all, you are the disgraces.

Take a look in the mirror you may see a slim atractive woman staring back but my God look underneath and it's pure uglyness.

This woman is dangerously over weight but seems to be doing something about it. Really slowly is better than not at all.

The diet she claims to give her children is harmful and wrong, hopefully she will get help to address this before it has lasting consequences.

One can only presume that she is of low intelligence and though that this publicity would be a good idea. For her it's not she has opened herself up to ridicule and abuse.

I just hoped that the ridicule and abuse wouldn't come from here. Stupid thought obviously.

SnortyBartFast · 30/04/2009 22:38

i agree jh,
it is surprising isnt it, i was going to start a thread slating The Sun ... but i was beaten to it.

hatwoman · 30/04/2009 22:59

what disgusting hideous journalism. the subtext (although not all that sub imo) is clearly to denigrate this woman and make her out to be quite simply not worthy of sharing this country with the rest of "us". she's derided for being fat, for getting pregnant, for having triplets, for using nhs resources ffs, for being slovenly, for splitting up from their father, and for claiming benefit.

and those of you who read this and take it at face value, without seeing how utterly skewed it is, ought to take a good look at yourselves. you are suckers.

thanks for the reminder of why I avoid the Sun. I had forgotten how horrendous it is.

TheLadyEvenstar · 30/04/2009 23:24

She went to 40 stone whilst pregnant, and the weight she has lost is since giving birtn, now being 29 stone.

If she is of such low intelligence then surely assistance from family who are aware she is unable to cope would be better? And if they are of equally low intelligence then SS should step in and help.

Lets face it...Because otherwise she will have 3 fat babies-toddlers-and then children on her hands who will be at risk of all sorts of weight related illnesses.

And yes some are laughing....maybe not because it is seen as funny but shock can do the strangest things to people.

OP posts:
chequersmate · 01/05/2009 08:29

Shock? Oh give me a break.

It's pure nastiness.

TotalChaos · 01/05/2009 08:32

agree with chequers and hatwoman. any of us with unplanned pgs could have ended up with a triplet pg and inadvertently using up a lot of NHS resources. and I bet that "anorexic" comment is made up or was made in a different context.

mascaraohara · 01/05/2009 08:45

I've scanned this thread but I'm really shocked by some of the comments that jumped out at me.

"hideous fat beast" etc

I have a friend who is large, probably a little smaller than the lady pictured (going on that picture alone). She has a lovely healthy child who is long and lean, who eats a very healthy balanced diet.

If I heard you call her a hideous fat beast in RL I would be having words with you.

TheLadyEvenstar · 01/05/2009 08:47

But these triplets don't have a healthy balanced diet do they?

OP posts:
mascaraohara · 01/05/2009 09:12

Who knows.. the article was in the sun

cory · 01/05/2009 09:24

It didn't actually said that she is feeding them junk food all the time.

The way I read the article, she could well be feeding them baby food in jars most of the time and some junk food more occasionally.

I had lots of extremely diet conscious friends who fed their babies food out of jars; there's nothing wrong with that. I preferred cooking because I am tight-fisted, but I doubt it was much healthier and frankly my dcs haven't been particularly healthy.

I know she said she only gives them veg once a week, but there is veg in most baby jar foods so if that is what they mainly eat then they are getting the veg, she just doesn't think about it (or was encouraged to tell her story a certain way for money).

As for the calorie list made up, surely that was the SUN extrapolating, not a dietician counting and weighing exactly what those babies were actually ingesting over a period of weeks?

If the slant put on it by the Sun is correct, then that would indeed be a disaster waiting to happen. Do we know?

TotalChaos · 01/05/2009 09:48

Agree with cory. I read the article as baby food jars with the odd chip from her McD's dinner. And from what I recall the meaty baby jars would usually contain veg anyway.

Nancy66 · 01/05/2009 10:31

The interview was in Closer magazine - The Sun lifted it as it was. They can't change and twist a story from another publication.

Chequers mate - given that some women gain 4 stone with a singleton pregnancy then I'd have thought it was entirely possible for a woman to gain 8 stone with triplets.