Please or to access all these features

News

Russell Brand 🤢🤮 - crunch time

437 replies

KidsDoBetter · 02/11/2026 11:18

Continuing the docky wock

don’t want to jinx it by referring to potentially Jaily Wail

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
sashh · Today 15:01

KidsDoBetter · Today 09:55

A v minor matter but I am wondering will Great Ormond street make a statement after the trial is concluded about RB being barred from the hospital during his son’s surgery?

That felt off to me. I can’t imagine a parent who had been charged but not convicted of offences not relating to children being “barred” in this way. I can imagine perhaps a conversation with the Brands about his presence at that time bringing a press throng to an inner city cramped street location where the very sickest kids and their parents would be highly disturbed by noise etc etc. But I really can’t see that GOSH would have barred him.

Do we have any evidence of that from anyone / thing that isn't Brand?

GOSH are used to high profile parents and on occasion high profile children (the king had his appendix out there).

Piglet89 · Today 15:02

KidsDoBetter · Today 14:49

I think we might be the same person lol! The stuff I can find out online 🤣 and I was an impassioned juror - though tried not to overegg the “I’m a qualified solicitor” line when explaining stuff too much as it can be alienating …

Yeah same but when that woman started talking absolute guff it honestly was necessary to try to mitigate the risk of a complete sideshow.

KidsDoBetter · Today 15:08

Piglet89 · Today 15:02

Yeah same but when that woman started talking absolute guff it honestly was necessary to try to mitigate the risk of a complete sideshow.

Gosh yes totally. I had to say it myself because of some deeply worrying aspects on our case too.

OP posts:
KidsDoBetter · Today 15:10

Margaritaaahhh · Today 14:58

Just leaving this here.

Incredible. Well actually not incredible at all.
And all those occasions were with cameras rolling … 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️. A during similar time period to the charges.

OP posts:
AlwaysExtraHot · Today 15:16

eastegg · Today 13:55

Yes! Off topic alert. It was the central Henry Fonda character who spots the marks left on his nose by someone who normally wears glasses but wasn’t wearing them for the trial. Raising a doubt about how well he’d seen what he claimed to have seen.

Excuse me being dim, but why would that raise a doubt? If someone who normally wears glasses (and therefore presumably could see well while wearing them) saw something, they'd see it well, no?

CoconutSwirl · Today 15:18

Margaritaaahhh · Today 14:58

Just leaving this here.

But why are all these women laughing along with what he's doing/saying to them😣

Whosthetabbynow · Today 15:19

Piglet89 · Today 14:47

@whosthetabbynow We can call ourselves Tabby & Piglet (PIs). Nobody’s gonna forget us so marketing budget would be basically nil.

Tho I do always remember poor Daniel Morgan of Southern Investigations who ended up with an axe in his head in a pub car park in the 1980s. Not keen for that to be my fate.

Edited

I’d probably not be keen on the axe part but imagine snooping about wearing a pair of binoculars. Heaven x

Margaritaaahhh · Today 15:36

CoconutSwirl · Today 15:18

But why are all these women laughing along with what he's doing/saying to them😣

Because when men in a position of (relative) power do this stuff, women often feel they have no choice but to play along. Particularly 20 years ago.

Their discomfort is often palpable in these clips, but still they felt unable to protest or complain.

IzzyLeng · Today 15:37

sashh · Today 15:01

Do we have any evidence of that from anyone / thing that isn't Brand?

GOSH are used to high profile parents and on occasion high profile children (the king had his appendix out there).

Yeah I’d also be surprised if this was true. I used to work as a midwife on an antenatal/postnatal ward where partners could stay overnight. We’ve had known convicted sex offenders on the ward overnight regularly. And on occasion convicted child sex offenders.

we were told there’s nothing we can do as they’ve served their prison sentence and we can’t punish them further. So can’t imagine someone who’s not even being convicted would be barred.

Margaritaaahhh · Today 15:38

KidsDoBetter · Today 15:10

Incredible. Well actually not incredible at all.
And all those occasions were with cameras rolling … 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️. A during similar time period to the charges.

I hope that whether he's found guilty or not, some of these women come forward and make complaints. It's actually on film, all the evidence required right there.

Thefrocklady · Today 15:45
Hopefully this link works. Out of the alleged 6 victims, only 1 had consentual sex with him before being behind raped/ attacked.,4 in the workplace and 1 in a bar.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/xfKbgT8Wei0?is=NTsYCcvjKyPnu3tW

KidsDoBetter · Today 16:02

@Thefrocklady - that’s from the end of week 2 after all the complainants had given their evidence. All moved on quite a lot since then I think. Helpful I guess for anyone not familiar with the facts of the case.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page