Will it revert to being a hotel for people staying > 30 days? I imagine it wasn't viable as a hotel business.
Are the "Serco staff" all not local? So nobody local is being employed, nor are local businesses benefiting from any service or goods the building purchases ?
My prediction is hotel will shut down and be empty for years before quietly being converted to flats... after the "no occupancy > 30 days" stipulation gets lifted.
After that, maybe the asylum seekers will come back, lol.
The government needs to build hostels for the migrants in areas/ streets where the median income is solidly six figures.
Won't that be extremely expensive, one of the most expensive ways to house asylum seekers? The land costs, the building costs, etc. I imagine poor transport links inthe 6 figures street places so then special transport would need to be laid on for the putative seekers to get to shops or govt appointments. Sounds inefficient & more expense.
Some politician was saying how the seekers put strain on local public services. So... is there somewhere in UK where they can live and WON'T be putting strain on local services?