Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News
Thread gallery
7
JackieWilsonsaiditstimeforbedlittleone · 01/07/2025 13:11

It isn’t shocking really. What’s shocking is that it’s not happened sooner. Why did so many babies die before anyone got suspicious?

User14March · 01/07/2025 13:12

Ophy83 · 01/07/2025 13:09

Where it may get interesting is if those managers defend on the basis of the recent evidence raised at the press conference a couple of months ago I.e. they are not guilty of manslaughter for failing to stop Letby because she didn't actually do it.

Surely a strong defence lawyer has a very good starting point for LL’s conviction to be re-evaluated. What a mess.

ohfourfoxache · 01/07/2025 13:12

Healthcare investigations are typically extremely complex. One does have to remember that everything is taking place on a background of staff shortages, enormous budget cuts, transient staffing, ever changing bureaucracy. It’s not just a matter of “the management are to blame” - there’s multifaceted issues at all levels. Things are never as straightforward as they appear to be

marbledliving · 01/07/2025 13:15

This kind of talk drives me nuts. This idea that senior managers are evil bureaucrats wanting to cover stuff up (why? they are WELL AWARE that corporate manslaughter is a risk in their work)

Sorry I have personal experience of NHS staff lying to cover their arses.

The whistle blower in the Alderhay baby heart scandal was unable to get a job again in the NHS and had to move to Australia to be able to keep working as a doctor.

I have seen, after yet another hospital scandal, an hospital official being sent out to reporters, not to apologise and say how they would change to avoid this happening in the future, but instead to read out a statement about all the brilliant care the hospital provided ( not to the young man who died as a result of failings obviously, but he's just one man, a mere blip after all). The callous lack of regard to the family was appalling. And that was not off the cuff, that was a statement someone actually thought about, wrote down, and read out. It tells you everything about the culture.

The NHS is notorious for this.

Shekoni · 01/07/2025 13:15

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 01/07/2025 13:05

But it indicates she may be innocent or have been scapegoated.
It brings a huge question mark over her conviction.

Well not really - it indicates that the defense have been able to find some medical experts who disagree with the findings of the medical experts the prosecution used.

annzen · 01/07/2025 13:16

godmum56 · 01/07/2025 13:04

To me it suggests that she did do it and that other members of staff either knew or suspected something and did nothing about it.

That's exactly my take on it also.

Perhaps nursing clinicians promoted to management grades, without the experience or training in how to be tough on staff who used to be your immediate colleagues. A warped sense of loyalty to former grades maybe.

incognitomouse · 01/07/2025 13:16

SPSontherun · 01/07/2025 11:33

Just before anyone starts wading in about shit NHS managers - I understand at least two of these senior managers are actually clinicians turned manager !

In my experience, clinicians turned managers have been moved into management because they are shit at being clinicians.

RedToothBrush · 01/07/2025 13:17

daffodilandtulip · 01/07/2025 12:51

They've made a separate statement saying it's not affecting her case. It's more a case of babies kept dying and managers didn't look into why/who.

Precisely this.

It was clear that there was a problem. They were aware that the rate of deaths was too high.

They didn't act to resolve this.

Instead they pretended there wasn't a problem and were obstructive.

This ultimately lead to more incidents.

The safeguarding procedures failed and were not acted upon appropriately.

The cause of this this could have been anything. It just happened it was a murderer. But it could have been faulty equipment. Or poor procedures. Or a member of staff who had been badly trained and was doing something wrong but not with malicious intent.

The point is they acted to try and cover up the issue not address it, because they prioritised their careers / the reputation of the hospital over the lives of those in their care.

More very very well paid hospital executives need to be held account for not dissimilar issues. If you have that responsibility you should be taking it seriously centring patients rather than hospitals.

PutThe · 01/07/2025 13:18

Ophy83 · 01/07/2025 13:09

Where it may get interesting is if those managers defend on the basis of the recent evidence raised at the press conference a couple of months ago I.e. they are not guilty of manslaughter for failing to stop Letby because she didn't actually do it.

Agree the possibility that one of them might offer this defence, if charged, cant be ruled out at this stage. Which isn't to say it would be true, or that they'd wrongly believe it to be true. But it's within the range of possibilities.

Zone2NorthLondon · 01/07/2025 13:18

Easily. Totally Unrelated issues
This relates to duty of care. SLT had a responsibility to maintain safe clinical governance and act upon reports of risk and/or practitioner LL reported to be unsafely practising.
The SLT will be asked to account for their actions regard duty of care
prosecution need to demonstrate (amongst other things) the breach of care directly led to neonate deaths

JustPassingThyme · 01/07/2025 13:19

marbledliving · 01/07/2025 13:15

This kind of talk drives me nuts. This idea that senior managers are evil bureaucrats wanting to cover stuff up (why? they are WELL AWARE that corporate manslaughter is a risk in their work)

Sorry I have personal experience of NHS staff lying to cover their arses.

The whistle blower in the Alderhay baby heart scandal was unable to get a job again in the NHS and had to move to Australia to be able to keep working as a doctor.

I have seen, after yet another hospital scandal, an hospital official being sent out to reporters, not to apologise and say how they would change to avoid this happening in the future, but instead to read out a statement about all the brilliant care the hospital provided ( not to the young man who died as a result of failings obviously, but he's just one man, a mere blip after all). The callous lack of regard to the family was appalling. And that was not off the cuff, that was a statement someone actually thought about, wrote down, and read out. It tells you everything about the culture.

The NHS is notorious for this.

I agree. I have had multiple experiences of multiple different doctors from different departments and hospitals calmly and confidently lying to my face. It's terrifying actually that our lives are in their hands.

I understand they are human so can't know everything and will make mistakes. What I don't understand is why they can't admit to not knowing something or admit to making a mistake?

RedToothBrush · 01/07/2025 13:19

WitchesofPainswick · 01/07/2025 13:00

This kind of talk drives me nuts. This idea that senior managers are evil bureaucrats wanting to cover stuff up (why? they are WELL AWARE that corporate manslaughter is a risk in their work).

In reality most will try to persuade bereaved parents that you think their newborn should be given an autopsy by the coroner, when they just want to bury their baby. But they can't force them!

You really haven't been paying attention to any of the maternity scandals have you?

There is clearly evidence of this. There's papertrails. Some of it is really appalling.

There should be a few other executive managers around the country who are sweating on this news...

withgraceinmyheart · 01/07/2025 13:21

PutThe · 01/07/2025 13:18

Agree the possibility that one of them might offer this defence, if charged, cant be ruled out at this stage. Which isn't to say it would be true, or that they'd wrongly believe it to be true. But it's within the range of possibilities.

They couldn’t do this though. They’re being arrested because the they didn’t investigate the suspiciously high number of deaths. It doesn’t matter what the outcome of that investigation would have been. Whether or not Letby is guilty has no impact on their failures.

AtIusvue · 01/07/2025 13:21

It’s actually sickening reading these posts.

The investigation for manslaughter, is because senior leaders, told about the suspicions of Lucy and the babies dying in her care….did nothing. Zero.

It’s NOT because Lucy is innocent. She killed those babies. She got away with it because so many gullible fools thought that a mousy, plain girl next door type couldn’t possibly do such a thing. So she continued to kill more and more.

Togetheragain45 · 01/07/2025 13:23

FloofyBird · 01/07/2025 11:42

I felt the same. If she's innocent I can't even begin to imagine her trauma.

This 100%. But even if she is freed, her life is in ruins. I can only hope that she eventually gets a massive Netflix contract.

NotDavidTennant · 01/07/2025 13:23

Fargo79 · 01/07/2025 12:56

From the article linked in the OP:

It follows a panel of medical experts has concluded that "no criminal offences had been committed" in the case of child killer Lucy Letby.
The 14-strong panel has provided alternative causes of death.
An international panel of medical experts has provided case summaries on all 17 babies who featured in the 10-month trial of Lucy Letby

People aren't "jumping" to anything. It's part of the article being discussed.

No, most people are discussing today's news that three managers at the hospital have been charged with gross negligence manslaughter, as per the title of the thread.

For some reason the OP posted an older, unrelated article in her opening post which is causing some confusion.

User14March · 01/07/2025 13:24

The horror of the possibility of small chance (?) LL really is innocent is looming a bit larger. ‘I did this’ not literally but because she was slowly gaslit by unimaginable stress, incompetence & chaos.

MagicalMystical · 01/07/2025 13:24

Shekoni · 01/07/2025 13:04

They don't usually name people until they're charged - up until that point they're only under suspicion and you can't go naming people who might be entirely innocent.

Ahhhh thank you.

MagicalMystical · 01/07/2025 13:24

PutThe · 01/07/2025 13:04

It's an interesting contrast with what happened when Letby was arrested.

Very true

RefreshingMist · 01/07/2025 13:26

AtIusvue · 01/07/2025 13:21

It’s actually sickening reading these posts.

The investigation for manslaughter, is because senior leaders, told about the suspicions of Lucy and the babies dying in her care….did nothing. Zero.

It’s NOT because Lucy is innocent. She killed those babies. She got away with it because so many gullible fools thought that a mousy, plain girl next door type couldn’t possibly do such a thing. So she continued to kill more and more.

Edited

You are talking with your feelings. Not with facts.

RefreshingMist · 01/07/2025 13:27

NotDavidTennant · 01/07/2025 13:23

No, most people are discussing today's news that three managers at the hospital have been charged with gross negligence manslaughter, as per the title of the thread.

For some reason the OP posted an older, unrelated article in her opening post which is causing some confusion.

It's hardly unrelated is it.
It's all hugely relevant.
A senior doctor at her trial lied in court.

Mistyglade · 01/07/2025 13:27

AtIusvue · 01/07/2025 13:21

It’s actually sickening reading these posts.

The investigation for manslaughter, is because senior leaders, told about the suspicions of Lucy and the babies dying in her care….did nothing. Zero.

It’s NOT because Lucy is innocent. She killed those babies. She got away with it because so many gullible fools thought that a mousy, plain girl next door type couldn’t possibly do such a thing. So she continued to kill more and more.

Edited

Agreed. The perversity in refusing to concede this woman is guilty is extremely disturbing.

Westfacing · 01/07/2025 13:28

I wonder if one of them is the consultant who claims to have see LL up to no good, but did nothing about it.

AsburyPark · 01/07/2025 13:30

HonestOpalHelper · 01/07/2025 13:11

But... Manslaughter and Murder are distinct crimes - so if a person is guilty of manslaughter another cannot be guilty of murder in the same case.

If that was the case the negligent party would be guilty of complicity in a murder, not of manslaughter, which is defined as causing death without malice aforethought.

There is going to be a lot coming out of this - anything could happen going forward.

I suppose it's worth also considering the deaths related to these individuals may not be the same deaths in the Letby case.

Edited

This isn’t correct. Two people can be charged with murder and manslaughter of the same person, it’s to do with culpability. In this case Letby can be guilty of murder whilst management is also guilty of manslaughter because of their actions or more likely, their lack of actions.

For complicity they need to have the same ‘mental state’ as needed for the crime, so for complicity to murder they would need to be aware of it for a start as well as acting with malice and with the intention needed for murder.

PutThe · 01/07/2025 13:30

withgraceinmyheart · 01/07/2025 13:21

They couldn’t do this though. They’re being arrested because the they didn’t investigate the suspiciously high number of deaths. It doesn’t matter what the outcome of that investigation would have been. Whether or not Letby is guilty has no impact on their failures.

Are people not referring to the causal nexus, ie if their argument is the failure to investigate didnt cause the deaths? That was how I read it, apologies if that isn’t the point that was being made.

Swipe left for the next trending thread