Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News
Thread gallery
7
thatsalad · 01/07/2025 12:29

Not suprised, I knew it that the hospital was negligent and used her as a scapegoat. But if you dared to say that on mumsnet you would get told you just "don't want to believe a blonde white woman could kill babies". Ridiculous.

NoTouch · 01/07/2025 12:30

hattie43 · 01/07/2025 12:28

I think it really muddies the water about her conviction . It may be a case we will never know what truly happened.

People are being held accountable for not stopping her sooner. This has nothing to do the validity of her conviction.

INeedAnotherName · 01/07/2025 12:31

I'm not surprised to see this news. The fact that her case has grumbled on for so long means other things were being deliberately hidden. Most cases of murder tend to fall out of news streams once the court case is over but hers never did. There will be more relevations as they try to save their own skins.

DOCTORCEE · 01/07/2025 12:32

FloofyBird · 01/07/2025 11:42

I felt the same. If she's innocent I can't even begin to imagine her trauma.

This doesn’t suggest she is innocent - just the managers failed to act on what others suspected she was doing.

leli · 01/07/2025 12:32

SPSontherun · 01/07/2025 11:33

Just before anyone starts wading in about shit NHS managers - I understand at least two of these senior managers are actually clinicians turned manager !

Nurses though

RefreshingMist · 01/07/2025 12:33

It's fascinating reading this and seeing how few people understand the developments in this case

Private Eye is illuminating.

NotDavidTennant · 01/07/2025 12:34

Wayetblue · 01/07/2025 11:47

I don't think anyone's suggested she's off the hook.? It's exactly that, managers who should have stopped her.

I do strongly suspect there were systemic failures leading to the deaths, and people in high places who it suited to have one wicked woman held responsible, but that's not what this is.

A lot of people on this thread do seem to be jumping to the conclusion that this means she's a scapegoat.

2024onwardsandup · 01/07/2025 12:35

Comet33 · 01/07/2025 11:33

Good!
It's been clear since the start she was being scapegoated . Like a pp I wasn't expecting such quick accountability but if charges stick then it restores a little bit of faith in the justice system.

they haven’t found that she was innocent!! Jsut that she should have been stopped sooner

Funnywonder · 01/07/2025 12:37

Ecrire · 01/07/2025 11:51

To quote the BBC-

"Cheshire Police said the case does not have any impact on Letby's 2023 convictions for murder and attempted murder.
Letby, 35, is serving 15 whole life prison sentences after targeting babies at the hospital's neonatal unit between June 2015 and June 2016.
Det Supt Paul Hughes said the corporate manslaughter element of the investigation focused on the senior leadership of the hospital and its decision-making, "to determine whether any criminality has taken place concerning the response to the increased levels of fatalities".
He said gross negligence manslaughter was a separate offence and "focuses on the grossly negligent action or inaction of individuals".

Even if the case is a separate issue from Lucy Letby’s trial and conviction, it could still throw up new information that could be useful to her legal team. It will certainly be very interesting. Guilty or not, Lucy Letby should not be the only one carrying the can for these tragic deaths.

whynotwhatknot · 01/07/2025 12:37

this in no way clears her or the crimes-this is separate

3678194b · 01/07/2025 12:38

I've seen nurses often go up the greasy pole into senior management and be totally incompetent, but gross negligence manslaughter is another level entirely. Good that they've been arrested anyway.

INeedAnotherName · 01/07/2025 12:39

SPSontherun · 01/07/2025 11:33

Just before anyone starts wading in about shit NHS managers - I understand at least two of these senior managers are actually clinicians turned manager !

Your post makes zero sense - they are still managers. It doesn't matter if that path was from a clinical route, or a graduate route, or working their way up internally - they were managers, and shit at it. Dangerously so.

Lifesd · 01/07/2025 12:40

RefreshingMist · 01/07/2025 12:07

My heart breaks for the parents.

But it's important the full truth is uncovered, so that lessons can be learnt and changes made

Fully agree with this - this is part of a wider issue of systemic failures in UK maternity care.

WitchesofPainswick · 01/07/2025 12:41

NoTouch · 01/07/2025 12:28

I believe senior doctors asked for her to be removed, but the executives/directors pushed back and some Drs were silenced or even told to apologise to her, requests to involve the police were denied.

So while it may have appeared they were doing something, they were still denying and delaying acting on urgent warning signs.

Will be interesting if it will be the Drs who never contacted the police directly when executives did nothing and/or the executives that have been arrested.

Glad more people are being help accountable to find out where the failings were and why she was not stopped sooner. One day it could be someone we love in a vulnerable position not being protected the way they should.

It's such a difficult call isn't it - when bullying is a massive problem in the NHS (esp by senior doctors) - I would have thought that the independent review was the right thing to do. It's clinical care - what could the police have done? Let's face it, it's been through a massive public trial and loads of people still feel there isn't enough evidence.

hattie43 · 01/07/2025 12:41

NoTouch · 01/07/2025 12:30

People are being held accountable for not stopping her sooner. This has nothing to do the validity of her conviction.

Well I think there’s a lot of un answered questions

RedToothBrush · 01/07/2025 12:44

If she was responsible then someone should be responsible for not picking up on it sooner given the scale of what happened.

If she wasn't responsible then someone should be responsible for not picking up on what was happening sooner because of the scale of it.

The rate of incidents was abnormal and has been identified as abnormal. Thats the problem.

daffodilandtulip · 01/07/2025 12:45

I repeatedly reported a doctor (when I was a nurse) who made at least daily errors. I was told to stop bullying and my incident reports were "lost".

I change my mind often about whether she is guilty or not, but I'm pleased to see that nhs managers will finally stop hiding behind clinicians for things like this.

ohfourfoxache · 01/07/2025 12:45

I’m actually quite angry about this tbh. More so than I thought I would be

The people at the heart of this - the babies, their parents, their families - have been done an enormous disservice. Whether Letby is guilty or not guilty, there were massive, fundamental failures in the service. Huge, catastrophic problems that occurred even without Letby’s involvement

I just pray that this is concluded swiftly and completely, and that some of the horror that they continue to face is reduced somehow

Shekoni · 01/07/2025 12:49

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 01/07/2025 12:22

“The panel said there was no evidence to support air injection into the stomach and the child deteriorated because he had early symptoms of a serious gastrointestinal problem, or sepsis.”

"The panel" are a group of experts unrelated to the case that Lucy Letby's defence have asked to review the medical notes. Their findings are not necessarily an indication of innocence and are not unbiased in my opinion (the person who formed the panel claimed none of them were familiar with the case before they reviewed the medical notes, which seems unlikely...). And also have no legal standing in their own right.

WaryCrow · 01/07/2025 12:50

Good start. Where should it stop though?

Does the investigation’s powers reach up to the politicians who have forced managers to cope in extremely straitened circumstances? Or the media, who whine about the cost and un productivity of all admin and redundancy devices, and indeed the public sector in general? If you’re looking for blame about why no one has power or resources in the public sector any more, or why so much goes into bullying low level staff to do more with lower safety, that’s where you need to look.

We’ve all been let down by right wing neoliberal rhetoric for so long.

JustASmallBear · 01/07/2025 12:50

RefreshingMist · 01/07/2025 12:26

Are people not reading the bit where a doctor didn't had over a memo which showed an entirely different set of events from the events they claimed happened in court?
That's perjury

I think OP has captured the wrong article. The memo one is from April. The current article about negligence is the one from the BBC in another post.

However, I do wonder what, if anything, is happening about that memo and doctor.

daffodilandtulip · 01/07/2025 12:51

Newyearnewmewoooop · 01/07/2025 12:12

That article reads to me likes she’s innocent? A panel have cleared the notion of the babies being injected? Surely that suggests she’s innocent, or am I being really thick and missing something?

They've made a separate statement saying it's not affecting her case. It's more a case of babies kept dying and managers didn't look into why/who.

Shekoni · 01/07/2025 12:53

Newyearnewmewoooop · 01/07/2025 12:12

That article reads to me likes she’s innocent? A panel have cleared the notion of the babies being injected? Surely that suggests she’s innocent, or am I being really thick and missing something?

A panel recruited by the defence have cleared the notion. That doesn't mean she's innocent or that their findings will have any bearing on her conviction.

NoTouch · 01/07/2025 12:54

WitchesofPainswick · 01/07/2025 12:41

It's such a difficult call isn't it - when bullying is a massive problem in the NHS (esp by senior doctors) - I would have thought that the independent review was the right thing to do. It's clinical care - what could the police have done? Let's face it, it's been through a massive public trial and loads of people still feel there isn't enough evidence.

It is difficult, the problem was the scope of the external reviews are usually limited to processes/systems they do not investigate whether individuals are murdering babies.

LizzieSiddal · 01/07/2025 12:54

Meetmeundertheclock · 01/07/2025 12:20

It is a warning This news will travel like wildfire through the NHS. One hopes it will make other managers and senior staff take notice.
Maternity Departments next perhaps?

Can it be construed as a warning about the consequences of ignoring Investigations and Coroners Recommendations. All those platitudes about 'we will learn lessons'.

Edited

I second this. It’s a warning and it’s about time. The NHS can be brillant and is full of people who do an excellent job. It’s also got people in it who deliberately cover up issues and often make whistle blowers scapegoats. Hopefully this is the start of them being held accountable.

Swipe left for the next trending thread