Of course it is.
It is just really hard to get your head around the fact that he had particular fears in life and goals in life and despite the massive efforts he put in, he still couldn't stop his increase his own mortality.
I think that's the hard part for the public to get their heads around - particularly if his work has personally help them make massive lifestyle changes themselves - which means they will get the benefit he hasn't.
I also think there is a certain amount of comfort for people to know that he had certain reflections about death and he didn't want a prolonged death. There are 'no good deaths' but perhaps there are deaths that we can accept more easily than others. If he did fall, then it is almost in line with how he felt would be 'the best way' to go.
He was a good communicator - that's why there's so much public interest. He managed to tackle difficult subjects in a way that made them simple and accessible and enabled others to make changes in their lives with long term impact. That's a rare quality. That makes people care about him because they felt he cared about them.
Even though it's 'a bloke off the telly'.
It produces this effect where people are emotionally invested and care and wanted him to outlive his father and prove that he could 'beat death' through science. It's hard to process that his fate is much more tragic than that. There is a cruelty in it. Again perhaps because others may gain benefit in the way he didn't. It appeals to our senses of injustice and unfairness.
That makes him more that 'just a bloke off the telly' to many.
He's a man who spoke about death openly and honestly. About his hopes and fears about it. That's not something as a society the British are particularly good at either. It's rather taboo.
I don't think it's ghoulish to reflect on it.
I think it's a reflection on how people wanted him to live a long life but they haven't got their fairytale happy ending. Instead they got the unsatisfying one that jars us back into reality and away from the world of manufactured reality of TV and film which seeks to please viewers.
It's about mortality and none of us being able to ultimately avoid our own. We can't live forever. This is uncomfortable to talk about. His death, in this fashion, is a reminder of that.
His legacy is all the more poignant because of this. It doesn't take it was from him. It's all the more touching. And it's a reminder to count every day as precious even if you are in good health. Don't take life for granted.
Yesterday I was driving down the M6 just before the Dave Myers convoy was due. There were huge numbers of bikers ahead of it headed to Knutsford services. On every single bridge I passed for miles and miles there were people on the bridge waving at the bikers. It was impossible not to be touched if you understood why they were there.
Sometimes blokes off the telly (and women) have this rare effect. You really don't want them to die because of the positivity they have on 'the masses'.
I generally hate all the sentimental tosh when a celeb dies, but these two have actually done something which has a meaningful impact on everyday lifestyles in ways and on issues that are often hard to connect with and make a long term difference to many.