Having caught up with the posts on the previous thread and the press conference and updates today, a few of my thoughts:
I tend to veer on the side of Lancs police covering their backsides with the vulnerable comments - it conveniently gives them justification for what appears to be a very early judgement as to what happened.
A PP commentesd something similar that the family, in order to assist the police, provided a lot of information about Nicola, which included statements which the police have grouped together as being deemed "vulnerable" and as above, justified the direction of their actions.
The press conference I feel caused more issues today, as to the update it will only lead to more speculation than lower it.
The mention of menopause seems to smack of desperation from Lancs police.
PF statement, I see no problem with it or any of his behaviour. If he had been provided with more information from Lancs police it may have changed the logistics of his search patterns both how and where.
Willow's harness, other than it being found, I believe it provides, nor should be used for any "evidence". Many dogs play with their leads and harnesses. Willow may have picked it up, taken it off the bench, been carrying it etc, so nobody can prove or disprove it was left where it was found.
Dog behaviour and the statement in the conference that Willow could have got out - many dogs (and this does come from an element of experience) will not try and exit/enter a gate/fence other than the way they have always used it - it is just the way dogs are with their learned behaviour patterns.
In the same area as above, Willow running between the bench and gate, if a dog becomes stressed, possibly the case here, it can lose its sense of direction, it's behaviour then becomes one of panic. In the panic the dog can run around like a headless chicken. This may explain Willow's behaviour.