vict17, I should have said "were probably also responsible" but I bet money that I'm not wide of the mark.
I'm not a snob, as someone else mentioned but you can't hide the fact that fox-hunting was the sport of the aristocracy when the monarchy ruled the roost and kept the plebicites in their place.
I prefer the society we live in now as we strive to move, albeit slowly, to a meritocracy and if to achieve that we do away with old customs that serve no function than for people to dress up, ride on horses screaming "Tally ho!", and then smear their faces with blood after the fox has been ripped to shreds, then so be it. When slavery was abolished, the ruling classes were up in arms over it because it would mean that their only source of free labour would disappear. I don't believe anybody would disagree with that decision.
As for my comment about 4x4 drivers trading them in for mini-cabs, well yes, it was facetious but lets face it, many of those people employed in fox-hunting won't really fall on hard times. Not like those people whose jobs in call centres are being transferred to India. If the rest of society has to accept that the notion of job for life no longer exists, why shouldn't the fox-hunting lobby?