Surely part of the aim of both charlie and alfie’s fight being so public is to get people talking about the ethics of the case?
If they want to even attempt to bring about “Charlie’s/alfie’s Law” then there is going to be a lot of public support needed- and for that there will be a lot of discussion.
Both of these cases were brought about to challenge the status in the uk of a child’s rights over parents wishes.
They really can’t expect the whole of the uk, public, politicians and law makers to just roll over and say “how terrible, of course we were wrong not allowing you to have complete parental rights, lets change the law...”
So imo discussion of the case is a good thing. Some people might learn why we have these laws and why the courts make these decisions. Then they can make anInformed choice about whether to support such a law change.