Do you think people would be frothing so much over the re-housing news if the headlines had read "Existing social housing completion date moved forward to re-house Grenfell survivors"?
Because for all the talk of luxury housing and £2 Billion pound blocks, that's all it is. Units which were already committed to being social housing (affordable rent and shared ownership) are now being used to re-house Grenfell victims and their families.
The survivors won't be given the houses, they'll continue to rent them. The flats will continue to be owned by the City of London Corporation, the local authority for the Square Mile (nothing to do with Sadiq Khan, totally separate). The City of London Corporation have an endowment of over £1 Billion, built up over the last 800 years from property holding across London and other investments.
I hope the ruffled feathers over poor people in social housing in a borough being rehoused in other social housing within the same borough doesn't detract from the fact that people are:
Dead
Injured
Traumatised
Gin, here's one thing I know for sure. No-one who died in the fire is going to be rehoused in that other social housing.
It's pretty disgusting how the media splash has been "Grenfell Tower survivors to be rehoused in luxury flats" rather than "Existing social housing completion date moved forward". Complete with pictures of plush furnishings and swimming pools. Those flats were always going to be social housing.
There are lots of questions here, from "will survivors with PTSD be comfortable living in a block again?" to "what additional social housing will be built to replenish London's housing stocks?" and "what will happen with the Grenfell site?".
In the first place, the KCTMO needs to get it's act together to work out how to allocate re-housing.
But this must not detract from scrutiny over how this dreadful situation arose. And the fact that many men, women and children lost their lives. In a horrendous, gut-wrenching, heart breaking entirely preventable way.,
Why were residents' fears and concerns ignored for so long?
Why was flammable cladding used in contravention of building regulations?
Why didn't safety checks stop the cladding being used?
Why did the contractor use sub-standard cladding?
How many other buildings have this cladding?
If they do, what is going to be done about it?
Why were these unnecessary deaths allowed to happen?
Why did KCTMO have such a loose grasp on who was living there and who wasn't?
Why did RBKC fail to help residents quickly after the fire?
How can this be prevented from happening again?
Are the UK's fire and building regulations fit for purpose?
RIP 