hefzi
'That said, as inexcusable as that is, the fact that it takes place is no reason to excuse it on the streets of our cities either. In fact, in a time of austerity, when mental health services across Europe are already stretched to breaking, is it responsible to be taking on people who have seen (and, probably, in some case, done) some awful things, knowing that we aren't able to provide the appropriate psychological support? No matter how to try to represent this, emily I still don't think this is an issue you can divorce from the issue of immigration, I am afraid'.
Yes, it responsible to be taking people that have seen awful things because it saves them from death and misery and offers them a better life. I think we do have responsibility and to deny it is wrong. Don't try to dress up your dearth of compassion by trying to dress it up as pragmatism.
Perhaps if more money was spent on mental health services instead of bombs, it wouldn't seem so impractical.
Rather than contesting my view that view that those coming as migrants are not more likely to committ sex attackers,you try to score points by saying, 'We can't afford their trauma anyway'. You're really reaching there. The issue is the attacks on women, not immigration.