Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
News
Original poster

Do Indians really have smaller willies?

124 replies

uwila · 12/12/2006 14:40

here

OP posts:
morningpaper · 12/12/2006 20:06

"In these unequal unions, when the male exceeds the female in point of size, his union with a woman who is immediately next to him in size is called high union, and is of two kinds; while his union with the woman most remote from his size is called the highest union, and is of one kind only. On the other hand, when the female exceeds the male in point of size, her union with a man immediately next to her in size is called low union, and is of two kinds; while her union with a man most remote from her in size is called the lowest union, and is of one kind only. In other words, the horse and mare, the bull and deer, form the high union, while the horse and deer form the highest union. On the female side, the elephant and bull, the mare and hare, form low unions, while the elephant has and the hare make the lowest unions. There are, then, nine kinds of union according to dimensions. Amongst all these, equal unions are the best, those of a superlative degree, i.e. the highest and the lowest, are the worst, and the rest are middling, and with them the high 1 are better than the low. There are also nine kinds of union according to the force of passion or carnal desire"

Gosh they spent A LOT of time thinking this through, didn't they?

VeniVidiVickiQV · 12/12/2006 20:07

How on earth would we know?

foxinsocks · 12/12/2006 20:09

haven't read the manual but I saw the video as a teenager and it almost put me off sex for life

morningpaper · 12/12/2006 20:22

fox it isn't really a MANUAL

it's a document of indian philosophy which originated about 3,000 years ago

morningpaper · 12/12/2006 20:23

It's a fabulous read if you are into old texts or religion/philosophy

Wikipedia summary

foxinsocks · 12/12/2006 20:29

it was a kind of manual in its time

morningpaper · 12/12/2006 20:32

I liked this summary on Wikipedia:

Chapter One: Advice of the Assistants on the Choice of Lovers
Chapter Two: Looking for a Steady Lover
Chapter Three: Ways of Making Money
Chapter Four: Renewing Friendship with a Former Lover
Chapter Five: Occasional Profits
Chapter Six: Profits and Losses; Reflections on Doubts Concerning the Advantages and Disadvantages of Relations
Chapter Seven : Ultimate FUCK.........

NotAnOtter · 12/12/2006 20:33

went to family planning and were informed that now two sizes are available.....

morningpaper · 12/12/2006 20:36

Were they "X-Large" and "Mahoosive" ?

yulemoonfiend · 12/12/2006 20:43

all i can remeber about the kama sutra was somethng about sucking, and nibbling a mango....

fizzbuzz · 12/12/2006 21:48

Once read magazine article years ago about something called "The Well Hung Jury". basically it was a club for men with big schlongs. I think the yardstick was as long as a coke can when (ahem) limp. Anyway it was some women's job to MEASURE them up. What a job beats teaching any day.

Anyway don't know whether any indians in this club, but could try googling it.....

The article was in some magazine, like "Marie-Claire", not in a "Nuts" or "Loaded" type magazine.

On second thoughts the thought of measuring all thoses massive wangers makes me feel a bit ill. All the men in it were horrible sleazeballs as well.

IShagAnIndian · 12/12/2006 21:57

Yes they do, I can't believe they needed to fund a 2 year study to find that out!! It's general knowledge in the Indian community. But they did invent the kama sutra, and size isn't everything!

Indian woman probably do have smaller fanjos, I mean look at the size of them in general. My MIL is less than 5ft, and her mother barely reaches my chest.

Apparently eastern asians are even smaller but I wouldn't know about that!

IShagAnIndian · 12/12/2006 21:57

I changed my name for dh's sake!| He reads mn and would be mortified.

IShagAnotherIndian · 12/12/2006 22:14

And he would take up more room in a condom than many European men I have 'observed'.

There may be averages - but in my well-travelled experience you can't generalise or expect everyone from any particular group to conform to the average or live up (or down!) to the stereotype.

LOL at wheelie bin.

expatinscotland · 13/12/2006 09:40

The things you learn on MN!

paulaplumpbottom · 13/12/2006 10:17

Thats one I had never heard before.

fridascruffs · 13/12/2006 10:42

one guy I slept with I was feeling really sorryfor cos I couldn't find it, and i thought it must be really small. Was preparing not to show disappointment etc. when I suddenly realised that i'd mistaken it for his leg. MOre or less, anyway. He must have got a bit light headed when he had a hard-on. Not Asian though (different continent).

Original poster
uwila · 13/12/2006 12:26

Did he have really small legs?

OP posts:
expatinscotland · 13/12/2006 12:27

Height isn't a sure measure of corresponding willie size, I can tell you, and certainly not of girth.

fizzbuzz · 13/12/2006 12:31

How can you mistake a todger for a LEG!!! The mind boggles.....

paulaplumpbottom · 13/12/2006 12:34

Wow I feel short changed I've always been able to tell the diffrence.

Rosydingdongmerrily · 13/12/2006 12:36

Nah, size is totally irrelevant. My little asian dh is my best lover times 100. Its personality and chemistry that does the trick!

expatinscotland · 13/12/2006 12:37

We'll agree to disagree, Rose .

For me, size is part of the chemistry.

Rosydingdongmerrily · 13/12/2006 12:39

hee hee, I don't like big throbbing ugly ones that look like a leg, yuch.

expatinscotland · 13/12/2006 12:40

I like big, throbbing ones.