Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

I'm astonished that so many people are in favour of...

686 replies

emkana · 20/09/2006 09:38

... smacking

OP posts:
fondant4000 · 20/09/2006 13:43

liquidclocks - point taken. Usually I have no idea who is/is not from a smacking household and it wd be unscientific to conclude from just one experience.

Mrsdoolittle - I did not say you were telling other people to smack. I said that if smacking makes no difference to how a person grows up, then what's the point of using it?

You came from a smacking household, me from a non-smacking one. If we have both turned out happy healthy and wise (as have our respective siblings) then why bother with smacking?

scotchick · 20/09/2006 13:43

wasn't criticizing liquidclocks. Just imagining me when I change into the incredible hulk trying to have that kind of self control!

MrsDoolittle · 20/09/2006 13:51

Because I'm an independant, stubborn, rebellious person and it worked for me fondant
Infact, I know I got smacked more than anyone else.

scotchick · 20/09/2006 13:52

mrs d, you must be exhausted! Take a break and a coffee. Maybe when you come back this thread will have slipped off out of sight.....

Twiglett · 20/09/2006 13:54

I'm in favour of smacking

and custy .. I loves ya

"your going to destroy your childs very being if you smack them. their spirit will dissolve into that place where fairies and angels die. you will break your child, make them into phychotic killers, or worse, tory party members. i beg, ney plead. instead of smacking your child. first reason with them. when you figure out that reasoning with a 3 year old is stupid then tell them, when they ignore you keep calm and repeat until you lose your temper ans scream meniacally. manhandle your child. grab them by the arm. pull them about, point your finger in their face and generally terrify them. drag this out for hours - intermittently betwen threats of throwing toys away, no tea, go to bed, and all the other punishments you can think of. its much better than an occasional smack. and much healthier for their little spirits. i implor you. terrorise your children - dont smack them.

this was a party political broadast from the real world party. ( as opposed to the phantom world of mumsnet) "

Twiglett · 20/09/2006 13:54

can't remember the last time I did it though ... but I don't rule it out

HRHQueenOfQuotes · 20/09/2006 13:55

Another household that uses smacking along with other forms of discipline here.

fondant4000 · 20/09/2006 13:59

Mrs Doolittle - you are assuming that those who were not smacked were therefore compliant docile children, who did not 'need smacking' - not so.

Our family had it's share of bad behaviour, rebelliousness, independence etc. just my parents chose not to smack but disciplined by talking to us and withdrawing privileges.

Result = the same. My conclusion = never any reason to use physical force no matter what the behaviour is.

You weren't smacked because you were unusually rebellious, but because your parents smacked.

MrsDoolittle · 20/09/2006 13:59

I know scotchick. How bad is it?
I'm working at home, not always a good thing. So I'm chipping in between e-mails and research.

I have just had lunch and I fed my chickens earlier. I need to walk the dog now.

Greensleeves · 20/09/2006 13:59

I feel compelled to balance this debate by stating that I think custy's post was a complete bag 'o' shite.

It assumes a great deal about parents who don't choose to use physical violence. Virtually all of it outrageously wrong.

And it's expressed in a very pompous, faux-authoritative way.

Bag 'o' shite.

scotchick · 20/09/2006 14:00

mrs d isn't the only person who smacks everyone! While she walks the dog, there's always HRH to have a go at!

Only joking HRH, wouldn't dare!

liquidclocks · 20/09/2006 14:01

s'ok scotchick - wasn't criticizing either. It's just what works for you really. I think I'd feel pretty sh*t if I smacked when mad, for me it's something that has to be controlled because I'm an adult and I physically have the potential to do great harm, I feel I have to do it when calm or I might hurt more than I intended. Same for DH.

scotchick · 20/09/2006 14:04

liquid, me too, that's why i have to leave the room. When all hulky, who knows what I would do . shudder

robin3 · 20/09/2006 14:09

I find it amazing as well.

I spend so much time trying to teach my son that it's wrong to hit people/things it's wrong to hurt other people. If I smacked him that would completely undermine me.

I personally don't think it's cruel or abusive and I was smacked as a child and it did me no harm but what surely it doesn't teach children anything about how to handle disagreements.

HRHQueenOfQuotes · 20/09/2006 14:11

actually I have a great story to tell you all about discipline. It was one DH and his cousin were reminiscing (sp) about while on holiday in Zim.

They were both quite young (about 5/6yrs I think) and were out at the village. Two Aunts came home to find the two of them picking the chickens up and throwing them at each other . Anyhow, they had two choices...........

  1. Wait until DH's dad came home (not a wise choice as the story would have been pulled out of proportion - ie they'd have been throwing chickens at each other all day and had done none of their chores) and therefore a not particularly nice punishment from him (he was a pretty harsh man when his kids were little

. OR

  1. (which they opted for) They both had to go and find a stick each.....a fairly strong one........and beat each other up!! - which they duly did!
crunchie · 20/09/2006 14:13

custy, sheer genuis

I also wanted to say to whoever further down the thread thatthey smacked as a last resort when said child was NOT listening to clam and reason and was a danger to itself and others, that is when they have smacked. That is exactly my reasoning for a smack. A child in a total and utter paddy, screaming, kicking, throwing etc is not listening to the voice of clam and reason, is not listening to shouting or anything. A smack administered then which is a 'shock' to the child is an effective way of breaking the paddy (and I use tantrum/paddy lightly as it is far far more than that it involves throwing themselves downstairs/pushing younger sisiter etc) It does work then. or in our case did.

Funnily enough the last MN big smack debate caused me to discuss punishment with my kids, an they decided smacking is not as bad as 'No sweets for a week' or 'no TV for x days' or even sending totheir rooms were all deemed worse punishments than smacking!! Funnily enough it is those punishments we now use!!

Greensleeves · 20/09/2006 14:13

God, what a horrific story

HRHQueenOfQuotes · 20/09/2006 14:14

"I personally don't think it's cruel or abusive and I was smacked as a child and it did me no harm but what surely it doesn't teach children anything about how to handle disagreements."

Ok - so you were smacked - but you still learned how to handle disagreements didn't you???

HRHQueenOfQuotes · 20/09/2006 14:17

Greensleeves - obviously didn't suffer any long term effects from it though - they were laughing so hard when telling me about it took them nearly 1/2hr to get the story out! They kept bursting into giggles!

Greensleeves · 20/09/2006 14:20

I laugh about some of the things that happened to me when I was a child. It doesn't mean they were a good idea, or excusable.

That story is a big departure from a normal smacking debate. Allowing two children to administer discipline to one another by beating one another with sticks is a fucking awful way to parent, whether or not they laugh about it as adults.

poppynic · 20/09/2006 14:23

Thank you Snowleopard. I sooooo agree with you that how we treat our children can't just be left to individuals to decide as if children are some kind of property of their parents. Its unfortunate but true that the reason abuse continues is because of the cyclic nature - child is abused by parent who in turn abuses who in turn abuses etc. etc. In one of the worst cases of abuse I ever heard in family court, the mother said, "I wouldn't do this because it was done to me." Of course that only made it the more likely that she had done it. Please, smack-approvers, I'm not saying that smacking is necessarily abuse - just that as a society we have a duty to ensure that our most vulnerable members are treated rightly - not just as those in control of them behind closed doors think right.

BTW, I don't understand why everyone thinks children can't reason. The most frustrating thing my very attentive, though of course imperfect, father did was to refuse to give me reasons for his instructions. As I result I have always used reason with my ds - simple such as, at two, "When your shoes are on then you can go outside." Now, at 4, he loves to reason and to try and outwit his parents, which he sometimes does! oh dear, we've created a monster - go to your room!!

HRHQueenOfQuotes · 20/09/2006 14:27

actually it was an aunt - not the parent that dished out the discipline.....and besides for where, and when, he grew up that wasn't considered that shocking. Obviously now it's completely unacceptable

But my point is that all this stuff about being emotionally scarred, and the children not knowing any other way to discipline, being more violent as adults, having resentment - is often (but I acknowledge not always) complete nonsense.

staceym11 · 20/09/2006 14:30

poppynic i agree that reason is the best way, when my dd is timed out she knows why and afterwards she tells me why and says sorry, shes only 23 month.

beckybrastraps · 20/09/2006 14:36

My dd couldn't speak at 23 mo.

jalopy · 20/09/2006 14:37

Smack-free household for 12 years now. Still waiting to be challenged....