Sherazade, in light of your excellent reportage from Gaza, land of ATMs and sweets for Eid, would you say that Israel was perhaps one of the world's least successful genocidal Frankensteins ever?
Would anyone care to contradict Sherazade and tell her the truth -- that a thousand people lie dead, that countless more lie in the ruins, that homes, hospitals, schools, roads, infrastructure, etc. are utterly devastated.
It is very clear from her description of the continued functioning of the economy, including ATMs that have electricity, and sources of sweets still in business (and charging for their wares despite the dire situation -- now how shameless is that?) that she is an apologist for Israel.
What possible motive could she have for including in her description of today's events in Gaza the implication that Palestinian shopkeepers would charge their fellow suffering Palestinians for sweets for Eid in these circumstances?