Seeker, you very much are on my list, you are a typical metropolitan liberal elitist. Just not quite one of the first 10.
And you are still being offensive by the "your god" and "imaginary" bullshit. God is real, He is everyone's God whether they honour Him or not, and He will judge all including those who disbelieve in him.
And homosexual marriage is not a right. Marriage has always been defined in law as one man and one woman. Homosexual relationships did not fit that definition. Asking the government to change it is not about "rights". It is about redefining a social institution.
And no, it's NOT like the mainly-extinct interracial marriage debate, no matter how many arrogant white privileged libs spout that line of bollocks off. The definition of marriage was not at issue there: it was always "one man and one woman". The issue was who could marry who, in this case unjust racial restrictions being applied. The raising of the age for marriage after the industrial revolution extended the concept of childhood or introduced a concept of adolescence as a social phase did not redefine marriage either; it changed who was eligible for marriage (say, 16-year-olds instead of 10-year-olds and up) but kept "one man, one woman". This is the only Western movement since the advent of Christianity to challenge the marriage definition and therefore cannot be considered on the same terms as any other social movement.