"I beleive in giving people the right speak regardless of their opinions"
The BNP have that right, but they don't have the right to interrupt functions held on private property.
You've got the right to speak, but you're choosing to not answer one single question or back up even your original thread title yet alone anything you've said since.
"you seem to think a good hustings is one where the voters are denied the opportunity to hear from each candidate."
No, I think a good hustings is one where the organisers follow the rules and can choose who they want to attend within those rules.
On the other hand it's very hard to gauge exactly what you think and believe.
You won't explain how the police were interfering with democracy.
You won't explain what, if any, rules the organisers broke.
You won't explain what rules or laws the BNP want changed so that their candidate would have been at that hustings.
And with my questions being labelled a "ridiculous interrogation" and you think that I want to deny voters the opportunity to hear from candidates we seem to be entering yet another cycle of the BNP Debate Avoidance process as you try to dismiss the questions. Will we see some unconnected YouTube videos posted up next?
And with the collapse of the BNPs vote maybe the people of Oldham who did vote for them are beginning to see past the ridiculous claims and statements and are realising that there's nothing behind them, and in Oldham's case that their candidate was acting like a spoilt child rather than a brave defender of democracy.