Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Chav names make your kids thick!!

268 replies

mancmum · 23/09/2005 15:07

Anyone seen this in the MAil today (read at work!!)

Seemingly government research has found that kids with middle class names like KAtherine and Duncan do 8 times better in school than Waynes, Dwaines etc..

Some teachers have said that PAiges are the worst girls of all and that the following names arose the following comments:

Adrienne (kiss of death - spiteful, sneaky or both), Alanna, Ashleigh, Britney, Candice, Chantelle (spawn of the devil), Chelsie, Chelseigh, Chloe (nasty, spiteful).

Cindy (always a pain in the a**e) Courtney, Cortnee, Cortnie (trouble), Danielle (a nightmare), Jade, Jodie, Jordan (pretty bad for a girl), Kayleigh (a pain), Keeley, Keira (live in fear), Kimberley, Kylie, Leanne, Leigh, Lou-Lou,

Mia, Paige, Poppy (hyperactive and not very bright), Stacey, Tyler (lesson disrupter).

And these are the boys' names that the teachers most fear: Ashley, Chayse, Conor, Connor (a nightmare), Curtis, Damon, Declan, Dillon/Dylan, Dwayne (a terror), Grant, Jordan, Josh (arrogant, nasty, selfish.

Kade, Kane, Kieron, Kyle (always spells trouble), Liam (always a bad lad), Mason (a horror), Mitchell, Myles, Painton, Rhys / Reece (a nightmare), Ryan, Scott (live in fear), Shane (a terror), Troy, Tyler (lesson disrupter), Wayne (a terror).

What do you think?

OP posts:
Cam · 23/09/2005 19:56

A good point Eaney

Seems a name really is a label

OldieMum · 23/09/2005 19:56

I had a good laugh at this, along with all the rest of us, but I cannot believe that anyone in the Government could commission such crappy research. Most of the names on this list would be given disproportionately to working class kids, while the 'good children's' list is disproportionately middle class. All the research shows is that middle class children tend to do better at school and have better relationships with their teachers. This is hardly news.

happymerryberries · 23/09/2005 19:57

No-one did the research....it started as a light hearted thread on a teachers website

Eaney · 23/09/2005 19:59

I was joking as well. Oh well I'll give up my dreams of atand up.

zippitippitoes · 23/09/2005 19:59

Bet there is someone doing the "research" somewhere though..gutted for them

Socci · 23/09/2005 19:59

Message withdrawn

janeybops · 23/09/2005 19:59

a few years ago my heart would sink if I got a James or Jason in my class - they were always trouble!

lol as I taught a Troy once - he was a 'lesson disrupter!'

happymerryberries · 23/09/2005 20:00

All my Chloes have been fine, and James.

happymerryberries · 23/09/2005 20:01

Once taught a Christian who was something else!

zippitippitoes · 23/09/2005 20:01

And Daily Mail journalist is clearly spending too much time on parenting websites and having to justify it in the name of a story

LaScummettaMummetta · 23/09/2005 20:06

I do think it's interesting though Oldiemum because it may say something about some teachers' expectations of working class kids and how this might lead to their underachievement. This may be quite relevant to debates like why so very few working class kids are getting to uni these days. It's not govt commissioned though, you'll be pleased to hesr, just based on the views of a few teachers chatting on the web and so maybe pretty unrepresentative anyway.

steffee · 23/09/2005 20:07

I'm called Stephanie and I'm not a "naughty boy" (to quote cod)

Tortington · 23/09/2005 20:09

its simply not true. my boys are a bit thick and are not on the list.

MaloryTowers · 23/09/2005 20:11

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

lockets · 23/09/2005 20:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

MaloryTowers · 23/09/2005 20:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

happymerryberries · 23/09/2005 20:18

I think not having grant support has a lot more to do with it that teachers not liking their names.

Loads of the kids I teach don't think about uni because of the costs.....that and they think it is like an extension of school (when they tell me that it is all I can do not to say 'WTF, are youmad ?'

Cam · 23/09/2005 20:20

Is Jodie Foster thick as pig shit?

MaloryTowers · 23/09/2005 20:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Cam · 23/09/2005 20:24

or Jodie Kidd?

skinnycow · 23/09/2005 20:26

I have an Eleanor - is that good or bad? There seems to be an awful lot of them now

Cam · 23/09/2005 20:26

Ha! Just found out that Jodie Foster's real name is Alicia

LaScummettaMummetta · 23/09/2005 20:27

Oh dear- not an Eleanor.
Notoriously bad, I've heard.

MaloryTowers · 23/09/2005 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaloryTowers · 23/09/2005 20:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread