Beer, matey, what struck me as interesting was that yesterday's ignorant posts came from people calling Rotts "dangerous", as ever blaming the breed not the deed.
Yet today's tragic but remarkably rare incident was committed not by a Rott, but an Akita. Which kinda serves to prove one of my many points about BSL and the idiots who call for it.
I am furious to have read this about yesterday's incident:
"Tayside Police are carrying out inquiries and have traced the two dogs, and a puppy of a different breed that was also present, and confined them to kennels.
It is understood that the animals' owner has given permission for them to be put down"
(BBC report).
So a puppy, who was not involved, was impounded by the Police. On what effing grounds?
And from the sound of it a perfectly innocent puppy will die.
BEFORE anyone comes back with "Oh stuff the puppy, what about the child, you care more about dogs than humans", let me get in there first.
I am NOT making light of the child's injuries but am talking about a completely seperate issue.
And (arrogant head on here), yes I do bloody well know what I'm talking about, with more experience than than most on here, as my posts on yesterday's incident shows fairly comprehensively. I still challenge anyone to match that experience or beat it with fact rather than just opinion and continue to bow down to those who do have greater knowledge and expereince of working with all manner of dogs and I don't claim to be the only or the best person of my kind.
And yes, I do prefer dogs to a hell of a lot of people and have never denied that.