It's a shame. When I was 15 without the internet I researched of my own initiative universities - I decided Iwanted to take scholarship exams and was working out which ones had them, sent off by post etc. So surely these days a clever boy of 14 can go on line and type in what A levels he needs to do XYZ but I suppose our point is that most teenagers are not as I was and most do what the school suggests. Many children like a subject because they like the subject or they go to XYZ place because their friend is.
I hope my son's school wouldn't ban traditioal "violent" books on PC grounds. I picked a boys; school because I want them educated amongst boys when the boy is normal (rather than a naught abberation as he can become in an all female, 100% female teachers, lots of girls in the class mixed state primary set up and that means boys have more freedom to be violent if they want.
May be it all just comes down to rugby in your primary school and accent, knowing the national anthem, traditional good education etc etc - Anyway most children go to state schools and plenty do fine but I still think there are things which will cost nothing the state sector could introduce.