I understand because I used to want the same sort of 'Just William' childhood for my children, and I home educated all of them at the start. No screens for quite a few years. The oldest didn't go to school until A-levels. They've all been academically very successful, have joined mainstream education at various ages - eg at 16, 14, 13, 11 - and we all get along well.... BUT if I had my time again, I would not home educate through the teenage years, and I certainly wouldn't do it if living somewhere rural where the children were dependent on parents for transport. It was great when they were little, but after age 12 or so got progressively harder for them to find friends. We used to go to lots of home-ed groups and sports and drama groups, so they were mixing with kids from different backgrounds and we certainly found friends who also had limited screen time, though mine were always allowed some. I also found that the home-ed social scene changed a lot after around 2010. It used to be mainly 'alternative' families and religious families, then there was a massive influx of children who didn't fit well into school.
Now most of my children are adults, and I welcome their honest feedback about their childhood. They all enjoyed their early home-ed years, but they all feel strongly that home-ed is not a good idea for the teenage years, because of the social issues. We live in the suburbs of a large city and used to attend 3 or 4 home-ed groups a week plus 2 or 3 regular after-school sports groups. We used to go to national camps, and my children all travelled on public transport from around age 11 so they could actually meet up with their friends. Even so, there just weren't enough people around for them to find their tribes. There was a lot of implicit pressure on the children to be friends with my friends' kids, and those friendships haven't lasted. Consistently, they have told me that after they went to school, they were able to find friends who they got on with much better, because they would have at least 100 children in their year group to choose from, rather than, say, 10 in their approximate peer group at a HE group if they were very lucky.
What came as a surprise to me was that there are many children in school who have quite traditional interests. I had been very evangelical about home-ed and childhood freedom from popular culture, but in reality it often seemed that many home-ed teens spent most of their lives online. The school children, though being kept away from screens for so many hours a day, possibly had more opportunity to develop their interests in other hobbies. I have met so many wonderful teenagers with wide ranging interests, teens whose families do long-distance trail running, or re-enactments, or sailing, and all sorts of other "wholesome" things, and they do this alongside going to school and mixing with lots of other kids.
I grew up in isolated rural areas and, even though I went to school, I still feel sad about the way this hugely restricted my ability to have normal social independence as a teen. I look at the freedom my own children have to just get away from parental supervision and make their own friends, and I'm clear that they have the better deal. We would meet children who came to home-ed camps who lived in remote places where they couldn't get about under their own steam, and these teenagers tended not to like it at all.
My personal advice would be, home education in the teen years is isolating, and living rurally with no public transport is isolating - doing both together is going to require a colossal effort from you to give the children freedom and opportunity to socialise, and it can't just be with people you hand-pick even if you can find the sort of people you want.
Practical advice: take them to the sort of things that motivated and interesting people do, and they will be more likely to find motivated and interesting friends.
- Re-enactment groups are wonderful for this sort of thing.
- Sports and hobbies are really essential.