Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
nlondondad · 22/03/2016 17:03

My previous posting was for rollon...

this is for

LineyReborn

Governors can already claim reasonable expenses. Hardly any do, as the money must come out of the individual school's budget. Only if there was a fund made available to schools, ring fenced to be used only for Governor expenses could this work, really.

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 17:03

But was there ever a 'green paper' on this?

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:06

Nlondondad
See your second point. There is a remote chance that the opposition is trying to stay focused? I think that's what you are trying to say?
I do wonder though about the parliamentary debate on the petitions. I am not very impressed by Corbyn in parliament.

But anyway, my main focus is this: MNHQ can end this post's story once Nicky Morgan fails to provide data or gives some twisted stuff , by pasting "disgrace" across it. So there is a warning in place for every politician before they actually try and consider us mums fools.

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 17:07

nlondondad, I was a parent governor at two LA schools and both times was told categorically by both the Governing Bodies and the LA that there was no budget for expenses such as childcare. The ONLY thing one could claim for was a bus fare to governor training events, provided free by the LA.

I think a small attendance allowance makes sense, similar to jury service, ie capped.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:07

Sorry cross posted
Thanks for the great explanation nlondondad.

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 17:07

LineyReborn

The green paper stage is more and more missed out. Margaret Thatcher thought them a waste of time. Tony Blair seems to have been much of the same mind.

Noble

I have no idea why it was part of the budget. Cynical commentators suggested it was to cover up, and distract people from the fact the budget "did little" but then one of the "little" things blew up!

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 17:09

I agree with Valentine on the 'disgrace' comment. Something should be written to draw a line under this post if Nicky Morgan doesn't respond adequately. Otherwise, it has achieved nothing; politicians can continue to come onto Mumsnet, spout whatever they want to without any evidence and there's no repercussions for them.

I hope Justine thinks we're worth more than that?

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 17:14

Well yes, otherwise these 'guest posts' are just political leaflets, surely?

JWIM · 22/03/2016 17:15

Liney short answer is no.

Why publish on Budget Day? A cynic might say that it could get lost in all the other 'money/tax' discussion.

At present there is no published Bill. It is an opportunity to raise the many points in this and other threads now to give the Gov pause for thought. I would hope that if the Gov continue on to publish a Bill that there would be robust debate, assuming the Bill reflected the White Paper.

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 17:16

@LineyReborn

Exactly "NO BUDGET". There is a legal power to pay reasonable expenses, which would include travel and child care, but there is no budget for it, so the money would have to come out of the individual school spending. The LA has no money for it at all, it would entirely be a school responsibility.

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 17:17

Valentine

I fear its not so much a case of the opposition trying to be focused as being unable to concentrate on more than one thing at a time!

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:21

ROLLONTHESUMMER
Thanks. I think it's best to keep this thread going as it looks to me that this is the only medium where I raised my voice and some one (MNHQ AND JUSTINE in this case) actually responded to me.
I am terribly anxious on this. Even more than what is happening at the NHS etc. This is engineering (tempering) the future of a whole generation of children in this country and at least for my DCs' generation, it will be irreversible if it goes through.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 17:22

@rollonthesummer

I agree with Valentine on the 'disgrace' comment. Something should be written to draw a line under this post if Nicky Morgan doesn't respond adequately. Otherwise, it has achieved nothing; politicians can continue to come onto Mumsnet, spout whatever they want to without any evidence and there's no repercussions for them.

I hope Justine thinks we're worth more than that?

I'm not sure I agree that this thread is worth nothing - it has revealed to Mumsnetters and anyone else looking (which given that the media has picked it up is quite a lot of people) the strength of feeling about this policy. I do think, and we always advise guest posters such, that it's better to engage with comments, criticism and questions than to post and leave. That's certainly a better experience for Mumsnetters which is mostly what we care about, but also I think a better strategy for the person/organisation posting - though obviously time consuming and sometimes uncomfortable.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:23

nlondondad
I was just trying to be positive 😔

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:25

JUSTINE
Thanks for the response.
So you agree in principle that our demand is justified. Thanks for that.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 17:30

What about if you terminate the thread with a comment from MNHQ stating how it was resolved in blue? Even if it's just

'MN has contacted NM's office requesting that she comes back to answer many of these questions, but we have not as yet (insert date) received a reply'

That would be very telling, I think. It might encourage future guest speakers to actually bother to answer the electorate if they thought you might leave things like that won their post-for people to see that they were invited back but just didn't bother.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:35

Hey hey hold on a moment please! Whatever happened to the "disgrace" idea?
Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell etc can use any manner of strong words to denounce the fiasco of a budget in PARLIAMENT! but I don't get to call a minister "disgrace" who posts something THIS serious here without evidence and just runs away ???
Don't try to take my voice away!

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:37

This is not on! Not at all!

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:40

This is not the country it was ten years ago. It's a disgrace. Our generation has been fed so many lies and has faced such tough times and paid and still paying for lots that we did not start in the first place. So if we can call this a "disgrace, please JUSTINE, please don't back down from this. You know Nicky Morgan has earned it hasn't she?

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 17:43

This thread terminates, I mean, as I understand it, no further comments may be made once it reaches 1000 messages.

So why not let that happen?

The Minister's continuing refusal to get back would speak such volumes that the word "disgrace" would hardly encompass it.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 17:45

If you are thinking JUSTINE that in future lots of people will become very cautious before accepting your invites if you go ahead with this, please think again.

  1. The ones who have some valuable data and insight to share will come anyway
  1. You can always announce a "ghost" post /thread about any of the people who you try to invite. You can announce in that space that you officially invited xyz to do a guest post on this xyz issue and they refused! In the mean time you can add "chickened out" in the Mumsnet dictionary too.
noblegiraffe · 22/03/2016 17:46

I'm sure that if JustineMN publicly branded Nicky Morgan a disgrace that would severely limit the pool of future webchat candidates. We get some pretty high-profile people on here and I have welcomed the opportunity to take them to task.

If Nicky Morgan doesn't have the bottle to come on here to defend herself, especially when she has been on here before, then that in itself speaks volumes about her character that will no doubt follow her in the future, without JustineMN having to say a word.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 17:47

@Valentine2

Hey hey hold on a moment please! Whatever happened to the "disgrace" idea? Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell etc can use any manner of strong words to denounce the fiasco of a budget in PARLIAMENT! but I don't get to call a minister "disgrace" who posts something THIS serious here without evidence and just runs away ??? Don't try to take my voice away!

Valentine, no one's trying to make your voice go away - in fact I'd say your voice was very loud and clear! It's really not something we do to condemn policies and politicians of any ilk. Nor do we try to manipulate, shut down or give verdicts on conversations. Our job, as I see it, is to provide a platform for open and civil discussion. Mumsnetters can then draw their own conclusions.

BridgetChapman · 22/03/2016 17:56

Please continue to pile pressure on the government by demanding a public inquiry. If academies are the educational panacea that they claim then they can have nothing to fear from a full and forensic examination of the evidence. This is a very specific demand which we should make sure they are not able to refuse. If you have already signed please consider sharing the link on social media or emailing friends and asking them to sign. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124747

Many thanks,

Bridget (teacher and petition author)

Tansytot123 · 22/03/2016 18:05

Academisation will destroy primary schools. There will be a huge amount of secondary heads running multi academy trusts who know very little about running primary schools. In the main secondary schools are establishing the multi academy trusts and as a result become the secondary head becomes the executive head/CEO of the MAT without even having to go to interview. How on earth can that be right? More worryingly they don't know how to cater for pupils in a reception. How can politicians allow this to happen? Surely it goes against employment law?