Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 17:54

Well yes, Pretty, democracy.

Cllr Peter Edgar is a democratically elected member who is opposed to forced academisation in Hampshire.

AllTheOtherUserNamesAreTaken · 21/03/2016 17:56

I have a real issue with the land held by local authorities transferring to the Secretary of State. i just think that local communities should have a say about how their local public assets are used.

rollonthesummer · 21/03/2016 17:58

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that

Why are so many teachers against forced academies then, Nicky?

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 18:00

The governing body doesn't have a say if it is forcibly removed for not agreeing to become an academy, and replaced with an imposed board brought in to make the school into an academy at all costs. That has happened to many schools that I know of personally

That's really interesting blue, thanks.

One of the problems encountered by many LA's in the past has been a lack of people experienced and able be appointed onto an Interim Executive Board. A lot of schools I know would have benefited from an IEB but the LA were unable to use their powers because they just didn't have the people to do the (unpaid) job.

The fact that you say it's happened to many schools suggests that the position has changed and that they are being used by LA's to resolve the problem of underperforming LA schools in their area.

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 18:02

If that is the case about land ownership, then it will be the work of minutes for the sec state ed to reassure the public - have no fear fireflies - it is going to be a nice easy few mins work then

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 18:02

Cllr Peter Edgar is a democratically elected member who is opposed to forced academisation in Hampshire.

What Cllr Edgar does as a politician isn't my concern. It's when the Council Officers are directed to do work to support that particular position that I have concerns about.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 18:07

it will be the work of minutes for the sec state ed to reassure the public

If politicians began debunking all the myths that circulate on Social Media about each of their proposed initiatives then they'd never get anything else done!

The details about land ownership is in the white paper. They've told the public what the position is. If the public choose to ignore the detail in the white paper in favour of Facebook status', then why should the politicians keep engaging with them? The public aren't listening, are they?

azana · 21/03/2016 18:10

On another note it seems like the hoo-ha about PIP and the change of opinion seems to have taken the attention from this white paper and the decision on forced academies, in fact Nicky Morgan on BBC news earlier this evening didn't even have to mention her role, or education at all.

What a mess! < You will note perhaps my use of an exclamation mark, permitted in Nicky's brave new curriculum world as my utterance started with "what".

Following this still with interest and await a response from the OP (thank you HQ) whilst being impressed by the articulate and informed responses on this thread, but still despairing about the real state of education.

JWIM · 21/03/2016 18:12

Where is the detail?
Should the LA land pass to the SoS? 'We' did not vote for such a proposal at the last election.
What funding will this require? That's not in the White Paper.
What legal consequences flow from this proposal? That's not in the White Paper.
What happens if the LA accounts for land value on a balance sheet? I don't know how LA accounts are drawn up, do you?

ravenAK · 21/03/2016 18:14

'The politicians' should engage with us because they work for us. So yes, it is their job to refute widespread...misconceptions.

Although Nicky does seem to feel much as you do, pretty, to be fair.

LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 18:18

Cllr Edgar will be presumably instructing officers to do nothing at present, Pretty, so no time or money wasted.

PosieReturningParker · 21/03/2016 18:24

I'll say it again. OASIS academy group pays it's CEO £347000 per year. I think this is the group that own a few schools in Bristol.... what's happened to the City Academy there is disgusting. The support staff for pupils are non existent, teachers are disillusioned and leaving in droves.

Once profit plays it's part in education the system is screwed.

MumTryingHerBest · 21/03/2016 18:27

PrettyBrightFireflies Mon 21-Mar-16 18:07:50 If politicians began debunking all the myths that circulate on Social Media about each of their proposed initiatives then they'd never get anything else done!

Perhaps presenting the facts rather than PR spin on Social Media sites would kill off many of the myths.

pdearnold · 21/03/2016 18:32

The wooliest and most patronising thing I've ever read. You're not putting schools in the hands of teachers?!!!! You're putting them in the hands of unelected, unaccountable people that will all have their own agenda of self promotion and capital gains. The curriculum is a joke now without the adequate detail - so now even the flimsy mess you call a curriculum will have less cohesion between schools. And as for assessment: don't tell children how they have to think by prescribing methods; allow children the time to learn all the new material; allow children to progress beyond their year group age doesn't equate to a finite amount of knowledge; don't chain down high achievers or label children a failure. You and your government are systematically destroying the Education system which will mean that a future generation will know all about the stone age; have a hateful relationship with maths and a completely xenophobic view of the world around them. Your British Values are more like; find ways to avoid democracy ; have no respect; chastise and separate faiths; rich individuals matter and do as we say.

MumTryingHerBest · 21/03/2016 18:33

PrettyBrightFireflies Mon 21-Mar-16 18:07:50 If politicians began debunking all the myths that circulate on Social Media about each of their proposed initiatives then they'd never get anything else done!

Perhaps presenting the facts rather than PR spin on Social Media sites would kill off many of the myths.

Tryingtoseethesunnyside76 · 21/03/2016 18:38

I'm a teacher in an academy and find your comments reassuring. So few people are aware of what is happening and it's refreshing to see such passion. The changes this government is making to education are horrifying and the forced academy programme is just one of them. Many heads will continue to run their schools how were under the local authority, but many won't. The media coverage has been as lazy as it has about the gradual distruction of our NHS and consequently there has been very little intelligent debate. I just hope people remember this come the next election. Sadly by then most of these changes will not be able to be reversed. Here are the biggest things which upset me:

  1. Academies remove a layer of accountability and put it all in the hands of central government. Democratically elected councils are removed from the system even if they are doing a great job. Look at Winchester, for example, where all the best schools chose not to convert. This makes it harder for parents to appeal, but also creates a mess in terms of providing school places.
  2. In terms of simple economy of scale it seems crazy. What used to be done by the LAs is now being done by the schools themselves. Schools are paying business managers and human resources people. They can buy back services from the LA, but soon many of these will disappear.
  3. Academies do not have to follow the national curriculum or employ qualified teachers. National curriculum levels have also been removed without a replacement so everyone is doing their own thing. The plan is also to remove QTS or qualified teacher status and for heads to create their own criteria of what it means to be 'qualified'. Good god!
  4. It opens the door for the privatisation of education and schools being run for profit. School land and buildings have just been given away!
  5. When taken with everything else which has been done I just wonder why we haven't had mass protests. Crazy testing for early years, widespread changes to GCSEs which have been brought in too quickly to allow teaches time to prepare and the newest proposal to remove parents governors. Our kids are amongst the most tested and stressed out in Europe and all these changes are making things worse. I love my job, teaching young people is a genuine privilege, and a government with, let's face it, no electoral mandate to do what they are doing, should not be allowed to get away with it.
LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 18:41

This thread is now a story in The Guardian.

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 18:51

Glad someone is listening. As the petitions are over 100k there should also be a debate in parliament i think?

BettyBusStop · 21/03/2016 18:52

So it is. www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/21/nicky-morgan-under-fire-over-mumsnet-post-on-academisation

Front page on the website.

ElementaryMyDear · 21/03/2016 18:55

Isn't that the principle of democracy? That we elect people to represent us based on their ethos, and ideology, and then entrust them to make decisions about running the country/LA on our behalf?

This is precisely the kind of proposal that should have been in the manifesto. Had it been, it might well have influenced a significant number of votes. The fact that it wasn't rather suggests that that is precisely what the Conservatives were worried about.

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 18:59

Pretty

We are not talking about everyday routine business here. Surely you understand the stakes involved? ALL schools of this country becoming academies is a BIG issue and must be discussed in public. ROGUE BANKERS, NHS AND DISABILITY CUTS are big issues. All of these deserve discussion. All of these involve as good a not so high understanding of how these systems work.
And if you are happy to bring in experts, why are the teachers leaving in droves? Are they not the biggest indication that experienced people in this profession (hence the expertise) are disappointed with what is happening? Or are they all just good old stupid to see how solid the argument is in the post from Nicky Morgan which basically lacks any kind of data whatsoever.

And I saw you are calling the discussions of theories about title deeds of schools basically conspiracy theorists who will put the poor politicians off from us civilians who keep on complaining all the time? That's a massive insult there. Again, if Nicky Morgan is able to prove this is not happening, it will put those stories to an end, won't it? But if she or her bosses refuse to discuss it altogether (considering the information about the title deeds was not handed over by the ministry of education to whoever inquired about them), it will just strengthen the impression we can't ever trust these thieving politicians who are working for the benefit of few.

ElementaryMyDear · 21/03/2016 18:59

Currently, the decision to become an academy lies with the Governing Board. Even if it is a "forced academisation" due to poor standards, the GBoard will still have the final say. Assuming that there are representative parents on the GBoard, then they will have had an input into the decisions made. If the parent governor positions are vacant, then that's because parents have not stepped forward to fill the positions.

Parent governors will always be in the minority on any Governing Board.

ElementaryMyDear · 21/03/2016 19:00

What Cllr Edgar does as a politician isn't my concern. It's when the Council Officers are directed to do work to support that particular position that I have concerns about.

Pretty, don't you have the same concerns about Council Officers who have been directed to do work supporting academisation before the recent announcement?

LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 19:00

Cllr Edgar and his fellow Tory councillors are just as elected as Nicky Morgan. They happen not to agree with her. She can't even sell her ideology to her own Party stalwarts in the shires.

Jubaloo442 · 21/03/2016 19:03

Speaking as a teacher, this is the final nail in the coffin.
I didn't become a teacher to work in a corporate organisation run by business leaders. I became a teacher to work with young people, to improve their life chances, and to inspire them. Sadly, the plans to boot out parent governors (who often ask the right questions that others would not think to), hand over QTS to headteachers, and FORCE all schools to become academies does not allow me to do any of these things. So I shan't be returning to teaching after the summer. There are other ways to pay the mortgage. I'll miss my students, but I won't miss the sleepless nights and stressed evenings.

Nicky says that we have the best teachers ever, but she doesn't mention that they're run ragged and haven't the energy to do the best for their students. She doesn't mention that in many schools these 'best' teachers are on temp contracts. She doesn't mention that many decent schools fail to attract more than 2 or 3 candidates for a post, one of whom may get the post because they are less substandard than the rest. She essentially doesn't know her a* from her elbow and doesn't seem to realise she is a puppet for Osborne and Cameron.

Petition signed, obvs, and planning to attend this Wednesday's rally. Cheers for making a very tough decision easier Nicky.