Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 19:14

Ok I am tired of it now.

JUSTINE ROBERTS & MNHQ
I am writing to you directly now. Can we not use the power of Mumsnet to actually set an agenda for a web chat with Nicky Morgan? Considering the really serious allegations surfacing all over this thread from all sort of people, parents/teachers/outsiders alike, Nicky Morgan must answer the following in web chat:

  1. What was the foundation of this plan in terms of data (we have discussed this already)?
  1. What happened to the title deeds of the schools previously turned into academies mentioned all over this thread ?

Now that I have written it here and directly too, there is literally no way Nicky Morgan can pretend she was caught unprepared. It's very very very easy to upload a power point file accompanying her web chat.
Once she uploads it all, we can make it a starting point to check who is telling the truth. We can check from land registry, local councils etc. I don't think I am asking for too much. If the ministry of education has even a few educated people working for them, this information is easy to organise into power point slides within three days (let's say five examples of schools that turned into academies would suffice).
what do you think? (Except that I am some bonker sleepless mum high on caffiene of course 😂)

biddy53 · 21/03/2016 19:18

Details of the rallies this Wednesday if anyone is interested

antiacademies.org.uk/2016/03/plan-the-fight-back-sign-the-petition-march-on-the-dfe/

Rally against forced academies this Wednesday!

Birmingham, Waterstones Bullring: 5.00pm

Bournemouth, BIC: 5.30pm

Coventry, DfE Offices, The Butts: 4.30pm

Derby, City Council House: 5.00pm

Lancaster, Museum Steps: 5.00pm

London, Westminster Cathedral: 5.30pm

Luton, Town Hall: 5.30pm

Newcastle, Grey’s Monument: 5.00pm

Nottingham, Brian Clough Statue: 5.30p

FreshHorizons · 21/03/2016 19:23

I agree Valentine2.
Nicky Morgan can't do a guest post and then not bother to read the replies and she needs to answer specific questions.
The thread has even got into the Guardian
I think that she seriously underestimated parents if she expected us all to read it in an uncritical way.

winshipterri · 21/03/2016 19:30

Hi I was wondering who is responsible for paying teachers pensions once schools become academies?

Mner · 21/03/2016 19:34

She'll never return to this thread or to mumsnet to discuss these issues. She doesn't want to engage with their electorate. It's an absolute disgrace for all the reasons stated above.

All petitions signed, email to MP sent, but can't go to the demo on Wednesday.

We should be looking at our next steps. Is there something we can post on Twitter? Is there anything we can ask MNHQ to do other than keep pressing for a return from NM even if she never plans to return.

Glad we made the Guardian

Duckdeamon · 21/03/2016 19:37

The DfE spokesperson quote at the end of the Guardian article is yet more meaningless / Orwellian dross.

FreshHorizons · 21/03/2016 19:38

There is lots on Twitter- that is where I saw it was in the Guardian.

Duckdeamon · 21/03/2016 19:39

Justine was "surprised" about MNetters reaction to the guest post / academies?

Hmm
Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 19:39

If she does not return by tomorrow monrningn, well, MNHQ will have to stamp "disgraced" on her post and enter it in Mumsnet classics. We earned as much.
Also, MNHQ must be far more thorough and cautious next time when they want to give a guest post space to government officials: if it does nt contain any data, there is no need to put it here and destroy the beauty of this place. End of

Pretty

Here is a conspiracy theory for you: I think you are Nicky Morgan!!

Mner · 21/03/2016 19:45

There was a lot of complaints on the jr doctors thread that one of the OPs never returned to the thread. They've allowed the same to happen here.

I don't think they're bothered about providing a forum for a valuable discussion with the OP, just a chance to up their usage on a topical issue. prove me wrong MNHQ

Eelus · 21/03/2016 19:52

With regards to pensions, academies are under no obligation to be members of the Teachers Pension Scheme, though for now most are.

Muuuuuuuuuum · 21/03/2016 19:55

Nothing in this post, Nicky, has given me proof that academies can provide an equal or better education than the many good and outstanding mainstream schools currently provide. Teachers and parents do NOT support this crazy political decision and a referendum should be held on such a fundamental change to the education system.

PosieReturningParker · 21/03/2016 20:00

Also whilst we've got you Nikki I know we haven't really and that is some weird PR stunt with the blessing of Justine Roberts can you explain why my son, 7, who is frankly a genius at maths gets benchmark. His writing he is much much poorer at and yet he's exceeding all targets, he's exceeding all targets in everything else you test him for. Why are you testing these kids? Is it that you really don't respect teachers and therefore don't trust them?

noblegiraffe · 21/03/2016 20:00

Well if Nicky doesn't pitch up for a webchat sharpish after being specifically invited, then we'll know that she's bottled it.

GColdtimer · 21/03/2016 20:03

What a totally predictable, full of bollocks response the DofE gave to The guardian.

TwoLeftSocks · 21/03/2016 20:05

Hostile's a fair description.

I do hope NM comes back on and is up to an honest, non-spin discussion.

cinnamontoast · 21/03/2016 20:16

I second the request for Nicky Morgan to come on for a live web chat so she can answer people's concerns. This whole thread - plus the vast number of signatures on the petitions - is a massive vote of no confidence in her. To claim on the one hand that she has children's best interests at heart while on the other hand ignoring parents' and teachers' wishes is hugely dishonest. She hasn't put forward a single rational justification for academisation (undoubtedly because there isn't one).
DS's school became an academy five years ago. There was a gesture towards parent 'consultation' - i.e. the head called a meeting where he announced what he planned to do. A lot of parents opposed it but he quite cynically said that he was doing it in order to get a share of the top-slice funding - i.e. the money set aside for schools that have more pupils on free school meals. There was no question of him believing that the children would benefit from academisation in any way other than that he would be able to take money from schools that needed it more. Since then, I have watched in alarm as their special needs provision has become perfunctory (DS has a Statement) and increasing commercialisation has crept into the way the school operates. Education is not a commodity and we should resist every attempt by this government to turn it into one. The contempt with which the current Dof E treats teachers - as evidenced on this thread - is a slap in the face not just for teachers but for parents and pupils too.
Please Mumsnet, invite Nicky Morgan back on and if she refuses – as she inevitably will – publicise her refusal as widely as possible.

GColdtimer · 21/03/2016 20:18

WTF. Just watching NM on C4 news ( in plus one) and she is just banging on about IDS. Why didn't they ask her about academies.

ElementaryMyDear · 21/03/2016 20:35

The DfE ought to be capable of producing the data in support of Nicky Morgan's post immediately, because surely they wouldn't have written it for her let her write all that stuff without ensuring that it had checked the data first, therefore her officials must have it to hand. The fact that they haven't produced it, despite the responses on here and MN's specific request, speaks volumes.

ElementaryMyDear · 21/03/2016 20:37

I wonder if she's banging on about IDS because she's uneasily aware that if she had any conscience at all she ought to be following in his footsteps? But of course she blatantly puts her career ahead of her conscience.

Ateacher · 21/03/2016 20:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ClaudetteWyms · 21/03/2016 20:39

Wow, she really thinks we are idiots, how patronising. I have seen how academies operate in my local area, I want nothing to do with them. However unlike most Tory MPs I can not afford private education for my children. This is all very chilling.

antiqueroadhoe · 21/03/2016 20:48

*Today 20:18 twofalls

WTF. Just watching NM on C4 news ( in plus one) and she is just banging on about IDS. Why didn't they ask her about academies.*

That's funny, yesterday she was asked about him and she refused to answer, saying she was only there to discuss maths progress- and then promptly walked off.

It's almost like she thinks she's entitled to refuse to answer questions whenever she hasn't prepared a little spin-checked answer.

Cylla · 21/03/2016 20:51

The dawn of the privatisation of schools...by the back door. Scandalous!

Schoolisback1973 · 21/03/2016 20:51

Totally disgusted by this!!! She is such a liar..
Nicky, do you really believe the crap you wrote??
How dare do this government go this far with our kids Education? so parents have no say, no other options ?
Petition signed