Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 16:25

I don't see

Aaaaagh, sorry

biddy53 · 21/03/2016 16:30

It's a long article - but well worth reading it through. disidealist.wordpress.com/2016/03/20/the-mysterious-case-of-the-disappearing-schools-how-state-schools-will-be-privatised-without-anyone-noticing

Brilliant but depressing article

noblegiraffe · 21/03/2016 16:30

Another Nicky Morgan lie pulled apart in a blog here:

justmaths.co.uk/2016/03/21/stop-telling-porkies/

Blaming the shortage of maths teachers on the number of people studying maths A-level under Labour....given the ridiculous curriculum changes I predict a sharp fall in the number of people taking maths A-level in the not too distant future. I wonder if Nicky will stand up and take the blame for that.

Abuelita · 21/03/2016 16:46

The Governor shafts the Chancellor's mass academization plans here: www.thegovernor.org.uk/

LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 16:47

The curriculum changes to all STEM subjects are causing problems both for teaching and learning in Years 12 and 13.

And if it wasn't for helpful support from posters like Noblegiraffe, I'd have lost the plot with Maths and my DS last year. Interestingly, the school were in the process of becoming an academy, and what with teachers leaving, the pupils were falling through the cracks.

They were given no advice on preparing for A levels from the shiny new academy.

1970fisher · 21/03/2016 16:50

Our local school is being taken over by an academy chain.

Parents have not been asked for any input. Not been asked if we want the school to turn academy. Not been asked if we want to join an academy chain. Not been asked which academy chain we want to join.

Parents have not been told why the school is being taken over by an academy chain. We've not been told what the benefits will be (if any). We've not been told anything about any of the changes that are taking place.

It’s a small community so we know most of what’s going on. Staff facing redundancy have given us a copy of the restructure plan.

Teacher redundancies.
Fewer teachers on new contracts.
Teaching assistant redundancies.
Fewer assistants on new contracts.
Larger class sizes
More classes being covered by teaching assistances.

This will not improve standards. This will have a negative impact on education.
It will remove any accountability.

This is a crazy plan we have no influence over.

LineyReborn · 21/03/2016 16:56

My DS ended up doing Further Maths without a teacher. They went into an empty room. That was the direct result of academisation.

Bravepioneer · 21/03/2016 17:17

Sorry if it's been said before, but along side many of the educational concerns raised, one major factor in the academisation of schools is that local authorities have to hand over the deeds to the school land to the trusts running these academies. This is the privatisation, the wholesale give away, of all school land. Think about that. Lost for all future generations.

bluna · 21/03/2016 17:19

My daughter's school was forced to become an academy over two years ago. From the frontline, I can confirm: CEOs earning more than the PM. Previously long-serving staffing decimated. Constant supply teachers. Library closed. 6th Form closed. Money and time spent on "smarter" uniform, not equipment or facilities. Classes in shoe-polishing (just joking - see cartoon). Petition signed. House on Market.

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"
PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 17:26

I can sort of see your point in this case but again we need to have a look at the data that brought you to this conclusion. For example how much the standard across schools was being affected and what kind of massive under subscription was involved and for what reasons. Most importantly, what was the opinion of staff and administration of all the schools involved?

Isn't that the principle of democracy? That we elect people to represent us based on their ethos, and ideology, and then entrust them to make decisions about running the country/LA on our behalf?

Have we have reached a point where the fine detail of all advice that is given to elected politicians is scrutinised by the electorate for them to decide whether the elected officials are making the right decision or not? Should decisions that make changes to public services be put to referendum?

And, again just to be clear, it was not MY interpretation of the data that led to the conclusion in that local case. Independent and experienced experts, brought in to resolve the chronic underperformance issues, made the recommendations.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 17:33

one major factor in the academisation of schools is that local authorities have to hand over the deeds to the school land to the trusts running these academies

No, they don't.

It is illegal for the freehold of public land to be handed over to an Academy Trust. Of course, if the land belongs to the Church, or the current GBoard, then that is different.

It is exactly that kind of scaremongering (and I'm not getting at you specifically pioneer, as that myth keeps popping up on my FB page, too) that will result in NM and the Government from disengaging from the debate and ignoring the petitions and public outcry. The facts about land transfer are easily available on the web, yet it seems that most people prefer to believe rumours and misinformation that inform themselves accurately and react accordingly.

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 17:35

Thats a very lazy bare minimum type of attitude to democracy. Fair enough, it suits many people. But no it is not exactly ideal involvement is it? Entire companies exist purely to lobby governments (not just in the 3 months leading up to elections). There is a specific website set up by the government for citizens to set up petitions that can lead to issues being debated in parliament (see this thread for examples). There would be barely any need for 99% of mps following your model. We could just elect a pm and they could do what they wanted for 5 years. Kind of heading down the path to another 'd' in politics - dictatorship. Silly citizens trying to get involved. Best leave it to the experts eh?

PosieReturningParker · 21/03/2016 17:36

"Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education."

You would have to be a sociopath to believe this Nikki. When academies are run like businesses and have no compulsion to have governors where's the parent power?

I don't even believe Nikki Morgan believes the rubbish defecating from her face. Teachers hate her, they think she's a joke..... and let's face it most teachers are in the profession because they love teaching. Now they are leaving in droves.

Nikki Morgan you should feel nothing but shame for what your department is doing to the education of our children.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 17:38

Parents have not been asked for any input. Not been asked if we want the school to turn academy. Not been asked if we want to join an academy chain. Not been asked which academy chain we want to join.

Currently, the decision to become an academy lies with the Governing Board. Even if it is a "forced academisation" due to poor standards, the GBoard will still have the final say.
Assuming that there are representative parents on the GBoard, then they will have had an input into the decisions made. If the parent governor positions are vacant, then that's because parents have not stepped forward to fill the positions.

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 17:43

Fireflies, shouldnt a govt engage with and dispel myths?

Anyway, land transfers. I'm no expert but i just found a very very long document called 'land transfers' for academies which says
"Our expectation is that all land and facilities used wholly or mainly for the purpose of the
converting school will transfer and be made available to the academy in accordance with
the mechanisms set out in this guidance. "

www.gov.uk/government/publications/academy-land-transfer-advice

JWIM · 21/03/2016 17:43

The LA has to hand the land/property to the DfE see extract from the White Paper. Church etc owned land - still thinking about this.

4.12. The majority of academies currently lease their land from local authorities, typically over a 125 year lease. To speed up the process of academy conversion and ensure that land issues do not get in the way of improving schools, when a local authority’s community schools convert to academy status, land held by the authority for those schools will transfer to the Secretary of State, who will then grant a lease to the academy trust. We will also take steps to ensure that the wider education estate is safeguarded for future provision, and that the existing school estate can be used more easily for new schools and expansions where applicable.

jellyfrizz · 21/03/2016 17:46

It is exactly that kind of scaremongering .. that will result in NM and the Government from disengaging from the debate and ignoring the petitions and public outcry.

Really?? Rather than disengaging, surely it would be more useful for everyone to explain clearly and give the correct facts backed up with evidence ?

Jux · 21/03/2016 17:48

DD's school became an academy a few years ago. It has gone to the dogs. It is now a specialist teaching of teachers school, as well as a normal school. Apparently this is a good thing. I think they got a certificate or something. Sadly the teaching for all but the very best pupils (top 5%ish) has turned to dross. The Head was a sensible man when we first met him 5 years ago, but he's so stressed trying to keep all the balls in the air that most of the teachers can't bear him any more (and quite a few do say so). Pupils are failing the 'harder' subjects like maths and sciences because there's no classroom discipline and inexperienced teachers who are learning to teach aren't able to control the class.

This was an outstanding school. On paper it still is, but the reality is different.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 17:49

The have explained jelly - in the White Paper - JWIM has just posted it above.

How many people who have signed the petition have actually READ the White Paper and so are expressing an informed opinion?

Badders123 · 21/03/2016 17:50

There's always home schooling :(

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 17:51

100% agree jellyfrizz

BlueEyeshadow · 21/03/2016 17:53

The governing body doesn't have a say if it is forcibly removed for not agreeing to become an academy, and replaced with an imposed board brought in to make the school into an academy at all costs. That has happened to many schools that I know of personally. And "poor standards" is subjective. The same school can get entirely different ratings depending on which inspectors happen to visit.

BombadierFritz · 21/03/2016 17:54

Even nicky morgan has probably only skim read it tbh

DramaQueenofHighCs · 21/03/2016 17:54

school. On paper it still is, but the reality is different.

Says it all really! Paper, statistics and results cannot be used as the sole ways our schools are judged and graded!

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 17:54

bomabadier

The devil is in the detail - the same document also says:

"It is not permissable for the academy trust of a converting community school to have a freehold interest in the land on becoming an academy. Community schools have no ownership of the land before becoming academies and, because as much as possible we wish to see schools convert with arrangements that mirror their current position, they may not gain land ownership as part of the conversion."