Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
noblegiraffe · 19/03/2016 14:29

I posted a thread that has been up for more than two hours with no takers:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/_chat/2595649-Does-anyone-support-Tory-education-policy?

Those who support academisation - do you support the rest of it?

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 14:29

Oh dear, this is the level of grammatical errors when you too are trying to keep DCs occupied along with trying to save their future.

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 14:54

Sigh.
Hello MNHQ!! Anybody there??!!
Just please give a reassurance of some kind that you will get the data for us ??!!!
We might end up being the ONLY platform in the whole country where that data is presented , if it exists that is.

Come on reply!

MissusWrex · 19/03/2016 15:24

With a disabled dd starting school next year I can honestly say I feel nothing but despair at the trash being pumped out of various lackeys mouths about this 'change'.

DrinkFeckArseGirls · 19/03/2016 15:27

The video about academies mentioned in the OP has been removed. Why?

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 16:00

We can certainly ask the DfE for that information on Monday, Valentine2.

lljkk · 19/03/2016 16:06

I agree/approve of MN publishing this Guestpost to accompany the other Guestpost (worries about academisation). Fine for Tories to state their case & we can all disagree as we please. Grin

Devilishpyjamas · 19/03/2016 16:08

Can you ask what happened to the video as well please HQ

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 16:19

MNHQs
Oh brilliant!!! Thanks so much ! I will keep hanging around here and will check regularly from Monday morning onwards for any updates.
Love you guys
Xxx

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 16:24

Lljkk
I am all for freedom of speech and that and totally believe in debate.
My problem is, the other post was from a person who has extensive experience in education and he is a deputy head and all. He did challenge the lack of data supporting this current hange by Nicky Morgan's boss (I don't think it's her honestly).
My problem is, a debate is where you actually do a proper rebuttal with facts and figures and answer the questions raised by other side.
since we did not see that in her post, I don't consider it a debate. It's a recorded message for all I care.
It's not like Nicky Morgan isn't somebody. She has a big CV and her degree is in corporate law. Laughed my head off on that one I did.

Buttercream22 · 19/03/2016 17:26

What utter tosh! I've been a dedicated teacher for 10 years now, teaching pupils with both profound learning and physical disabilities. What are to become of our special schools?
You have also announced that you are scrapping QTS-qualified teacher status and allowing Heads to decided who is fit to teach. This is opens to so much abuse, I don't know even where to start! No standardisation across the country just erodes the teaching profession and standards. You are allowing academies to employ unqualified teachers at the expense of those who trained and spent money on training! I think the teachers who are training now, want there £9k back!!!
This is such a sad day for education, I am leaving the profession at the end of the year! I will dearly miss the children I teach...but I can't teach with conviction anymore!

BitOutOfPractice · 19/03/2016 17:30

Academisation?

BitOutOfPractice · 19/03/2016 17:36

So what she's saying, basically, is that she's going to give us a website to compensate our kids for ruining their schools. That's alright then. As long as we've got a website.

I'm in marketing so I know that an online portal is just bullshit for "a web site".

DramaQueenofHighCs · 19/03/2016 17:48

To be fair Buttercream some of the best teachers I have worked with (particularly for SEN!!) have been unqualified teachers!
I don't think a teaching 'qualification' proves you can effectively teach students. However I do hope that the pay scale for qualified teachers will be at a higher level than for unqualified teachers, and that there will be things in place to help protect our children from being taught by people who can't teach whether they be qualified or not!! I hope teaching interviews will be carried out by getting candidates to actually teach a lesson or two and see how they get on with the students and other staff etc. I think they'd also need a high level qualification in the subject they teach (many high school qualified teachers do not actually have a high level qualification in the subject they teach, particularly in the arts) and at least GCSE (or equivalent) in English and/or maths.

Buttercream22 · 19/03/2016 17:57

DramaQueen.
Totally agree, I've seen some fantastic unqualified teachers teach throughout the schools I have worked at. But unfortunately the schools have taken advantage of them. They've been given a teachers work load without the pay. Still expected to get 'oursranding' in lessons without the time and support that is needed.

It just seems so unfair. 2 pay scales sounds like a good one!!

weirdsister · 19/03/2016 18:18

There's already an unqualified teacher's pay scale, but ultimately academies can pay what they like anyway.

DramaQueenofHighCs · 19/03/2016 18:19

I agree with you there Buttercream!

GooseberryRoolz · 19/03/2016 18:30

I just popped on to see if anybody had linked the petition.

Delighted to see it was linked in the first few posts Smile

Here it is again for luck;

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124702

noblegiraffe · 19/03/2016 18:33

MNHQ, if you do get Nicky on the phone, could you also please ask her whatever happened to the Workload Challenge?

What we really need is a webchat. If Nicky Morgan is really interested in engaging with parents though this parent portal thingy (although clearly not interested in engaging with parents if they want to be parent governors, and introducing bills to deliberately stop parents from opposing academisation - this was before the latest forced academisation), then she should absolutely be up for it.

Funnily enough I was about to post that Gove did one, but when I went back to look at it, all his posts have been withdrawn. MNHQ, why is that?

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/mumsnet_live_events/953781-Michael-Gove-Conservative-Shadow-Schools-and-Families-Minister-live-on?pg=1

GooseberryRoolz · 19/03/2016 18:39

Tell her we promise not to ask her any sums. I know she doesn't like those Smile

antiqueroadhoe · 19/03/2016 18:40

Noble - the Workload Challenge - all that came out of it was that they said they would ask again in 4 years.

Mner · 19/03/2016 18:55

As with the junior doctor thread, I think it is a disgrace that MPs come onto a forum such as this, spout propaganda and then bugger off. If these changes really were advantageous to the people it will affect, why won't they argue their case properly? Why won't they come back and answer questions from the people they are supposed to represent?

MNHQ as a parenting website, we should be calling ministers to account. We should be campaigning against this change. It affects all of our children. I'm reporting my post to suggest a MNHQ campaign against this.

I've written to my MP to ask for the evidence behind this.

lljkk · 19/03/2016 18:58

...we should be calling ministers to account. We should be campaigning against this change.

Isn't that rather presuming that all MNers are against? Most are probably confused. or maybe that's just me

prettybird · 19/03/2016 19:10

Shock and Hmm and Angry at all Michael Gove's posts being withdrawn.

Is he (and the Government) feart of being caught out in their lies?

What an indictment of both Michael Gove and MNHQ for letting him - as a public figure who voluntarily came on a WebChat - delete his posts HmmAngry

antiqueroadhoe · 19/03/2016 19:13

I don't understand why they are all deleted. Can anyone explain why?