Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
lucyrhi · 19/03/2016 13:19

I work in a primary and we struggle to get many parents to look at the regular website, constantly replying to queries in the diary about events that have been on the site for months. These parents are just as unlikely to use a portal, meaning another thing that takes teachers hours to update that just the same small percentage of parents use. A portal is NOT a fair replacement for parent governor

gill57 · 19/03/2016 13:22

Does anyone know of an academy with a specialist teacher to ensure that my child can access her lessons when vision problems hinder her. The local authority employs them. Academies need to pay in to this service. Will they? My child has learning difficulties that mean the ebacc is not suitable. What else will they offer? My guess is they won't offer a place.

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 13:24

Freshhorizons
Thanks for that. I am refreshing this page every ten minutes. I have no money to go private or tuitions and I can't emigrate either. I am going to keep posting here till I get a response. I have not much else going on for me if I can't even protect the education I thought my kids can get after paying that much in taxes.

FreshHorizons · 19/03/2016 13:29

I bet MNHQ are short staffed on a Saturday, but having allowed someone to post such blatant propaganda they should at least comment, even if they can't manage to get Nicky Morgan to respond.

Devilishpyjamas · 19/03/2016 13:35

Gill57 - your child is exactly the child I was thinking about when I mentioned specialist VI teachers above. I don't see how thst specialist support (VI/behaviour/ASD etc) teams which provide support to mainsteam schools will last. I thubk there's a real risk that academies will not buy them in.

BadDoGooder · 19/03/2016 13:36

I'm with you Valentine and Fresh.
This is supposed to be a democratic country.
It's the very definition of un-democratic to allow a minister to come on a public forum, spout some very debateable things as facts, and then disappear without answering a single question.

MNHQ where are you?
And if Nicky Morgan is too frightened to stick up for her policies, then maybe you could at least explain why you allowed her to post government propaganda, without having to answer to the public?
If an MP is not prepared to back up their posts by answering questions, then they shouldn't be allowed a platform.
Democracy should work both ways!

GColdtimer · 19/03/2016 13:52

I asked that here baddogooder www.mumsnet.com/Talk/site_stuff/2595311-does-anyone-else-think-politicians-should-come-on-a-web-chat-it-not-at-all

Had a pretty wishy washy response from MNGQ

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 13:52

Baddogooder
Thanks . I am feeling very anxious and trapped. What am I going to do if this goes through? I don't trust even the current system as it is because teachers are so Unsatisfied with the situation and leaving in thousands. They are the ones facing the heat so how come no one listening to them? We have the best academic minds in this country, the top six universities among the top 30 are here. So how come we are so short of actual facts and figures and what does this lack of data mean?
Now a new system for teacchers to cope with on top of very restricted funding options and this looks like becoming a post code lottery which the current system already is to some extent. THere is a limit to how much we can fight in a certain amount of time, say next five years, as a family.
I see my kids and tens of thousands others (students and teachers and parents) loosing precious time of their lives, Nicky Morgan and likes becoming an expert consultant yet again on something she already does not look like she knows ( hence pocketing vast sums of money that could go to correcting what's wrong right now) and a vast increase in the misery of the wonderful people who are to teach my DCs in those godforsaken proposed academies.
I have been awake last night dreading what it could and could not lead to.

MNHQ
where are you?

kamarastar · 19/03/2016 13:55

I haven't read the OP. I can not be arsed with her propaganda, however, just quickly, if I may, as I'm rushing out, just want to post my two-penneth. My child now attends a secondary academy and hates it. Her and her friends call it a prison. Putting young tweens aside, I am equally fascinated and appalled at the test culture that has taken hold. My daughter is good at arts and gets an exceptional in 'philosophy and ethics'. Not so strong at Maths and Sciences. However. she is placed in the second to bottom stream. Whilst those who are strong at Maths and Sciences are in the top stream. They are good at regurgitating facts yet social skills are not necessarily as strong neither is consideration for others. Being good at regurgitating facts is given great value... generally speaking, not thinking for yourself or considering others. I am supporting my daughter in going at her own pace, that is best I can do and myself and her dad are incredibly proud of her inspite of this testing and grading onslaught. I also know a friend who works at a universities career department. She informed me how mental health issues are on the increase due to all the pressure Also, how employers these days are not looking for those with A* because the ones with B's are generally better all rounders - makes sense. But what a sad state of affairs. It is disgusting that this testing to death is to be rolled out in primaries.

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 13:55

Twofalls
In that case the MNHQ must remove this post altogether, declare her to be a troll and never ever let any government official post here as a free propaganda tool.
At least mothers in this country should feel secure that there is one place they can always call pure. 😡😡

GColdtimer · 19/03/2016 14:01

This is the response I got from KateMN valentines

Hi there and thanks for reporting this.

It's tricky - we always encourage guest posters to come on to the thread and engage, but realistically politicians have many commitments and it's often not possible. And as you point out, a guest post is by nature a different animal to a webchat, in that there's no obligation to stay on the thread. We think there's value in them nonetheless - they often spark really interesting and passionate debate, and are a prompt for those MNers with an impressive knowledge of the subject in hand to share their perspectives too.

The question of airtime is also a bit tricky. We do try hard to offer a balance on crunchy issues like this one (the junior doctors' strike is another example). In fact, it was we who approached the Department for Education yesterday - we asked if they'd like to explain their thinking with regard to academisation, because we had a very strong guest post from a deputy head teacher on this issue putting the opposing view. If we stopped having guest posts from politicians, quite possibly we'd have missed out on the deputy head's post too.

But thanks for your feedback; it's an interesting area and we'll certainly give it some thought.

Of course some people may argue MN are allowing politicians to post so they can get torn to shreds and love ok bad but I don't think so.

I have reported your post for you and asked for a response.

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 14:03

Hello all

I responded last night on a thread raising similar issues, so apologies if you've heard some of this before.

On the question of balance, we try hard to offer a counterpoint on crunchy issues like this one (the junior doctors' strike is another example). In fact, it was we who approached the Department for Education on Thursday - we asked if they'd like to explain their thinking with regard to academisation, because we already had a very strong guest postfrom a deputy head teacher on this issue putting the opposing view. If we stopped having guest posts from politicians, quite possibly we'd have missed out on the deputy head's post too.

As for engaging on the subsequent thread, it's tricky - we always encourage guest posters to do so and indeed did in this case, but realistically politicians have many commitments and it's often not possible. And as some of you have pointed out, a guest post is by nature a different animal to a webchat, in that there's no obligation to stay on the thread. We think there's value in them nonetheless - they often spark really interesting and passionate debate, and are a prompt for those MNers with an impressive knowledge of the subject in hand to share their perspectives too (as has demonstrably, and powerfully, happened here).

But thanks for your feedback; I'm one of the ones who doesn't officially do the weekends so I'm off to play with the DC now - butwe'll give it some thought when we're all back in the office on Monday. Making sure that posts on similar issues don't go live at EOP on Fridays is a good suggestion - wewere expecting this one on Thursday in fact, but there was a delay.

Thanks all.

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 14:04

And apols for the strange spacing - most odd, will investigate.

GColdtimer · 19/03/2016 14:06

Kate you never responded to this question
/ comment last night

Why would you have missed out on the deputy heads post? If you wanted to put the other side, invite a head of an academy, I think it's wrong for MN to be used as a forum for a party political broadcast.

FreshHorizons · 19/03/2016 14:06

You were right about the wishy washy response!

tangerinesarenottheonlyfruit · 19/03/2016 14:08

Did you C+P from Word KateMumsnet?

My copy of Word has started to eat spaces recently - it's very odd., and very annoying!

It means I need to check documents every time I open them, else they get saved with some of the words combined.

BadDoGooder · 19/03/2016 14:09

Thanks for responding Kate.

I feel very strongly that on a place like MN, where ordinary Joe Public's are encouraged to actively engage and debate each other, it is totally unethical to allow politicians to remain unanswerable to us.
If a politician is unwilling (or doesn't have time Hmm ) to actively engage, then they shouldn't be allowed to post.

There are very few places now where the public gets to directly address MPs, and I would hope MN would lead the way in giving us the place to do so.

FreshHorizons · 19/03/2016 14:10

I was responding to twofalls and only saw KateMumsnet after I posted - however I still think it wishy, washy.

tangerinesarenottheonlyfruit · 19/03/2016 14:10

"I think it's wrong for MN to be used as a forum for a party political broadcast."

I like that MN gets politicians on here to comment.

It's not as if there were no comments allowed - that would be a broadcast.

Instead it's a discussion, which Nicky has failed to take part in , and in which we have pretty much ripped her patronising, inaccurate post apart.

Perhaps MN could do more to encourage the politicians to reply, but ultimately I much prefer that they come here to post than that they don't.

FreshHorizons · 19/03/2016 14:13

I agree BadDoGooder and if they are not going to give the time, or even read responses, they shouldn't be invited to post.
In any case I would have thought it helpful to know what the general public think.

BadDoGooder · 19/03/2016 14:13

Oh should add, that there are a myriad of ways we are allowed to "contact" MPs. But there are very few places where they are forced to answer questions without having the time to think of an evasive reply, or get their PR person to draft an acceptable response.

CountessDracula · 19/03/2016 14:16

I wonder who is going to be wheeled out on QT next week to claim that this was just a suggestion?

It is such fun watching this bunch of self serving tossers shooting themselves in the foot time and again. My popcorn consumption has increased exponentially. .

BadDoGooder · 19/03/2016 14:18

I honestly don't think they care at all what we think Fresh.
So long as they keep on appealing to their core voters, and getting the rest of us to argue amongst ourselves and fiddling constituency boundaries they can carry on with their ideology driven agenda, safe in the knowledge that by the time they get to the next election they will have made so many changes that getting our services and schools back will be nigh on impossible, no matter who makes it in.

CountessDracula · 19/03/2016 14:20

And I should say that the way that you and your toad-faced predecessor constantly mess about with the eduction system with no consultation or proper thought was the main reason we ended up choosing private education for secondary. This makes me very glad we did, despite the outrageous cost. Lucky we only have one child in this respect

Valentine2 · 19/03/2016 14:26

Kate@MNHQ
thanks for the response on a Saturday when you really should be enjoying your day.

But it really is no response so it was not worth time away from your DCs.
Let me write this it like this:

  1. You contacted them and they sent you an official response. Do you actually agree that the material her office gave to you amounts to something substantial hence worth sharing in this space? or was it a space filling, staying relevant exercise?
  1. Did she indeed give you some data, ANY data, containing ANY kind of graphs or charts or statistical analysis and you removed it for the sake of keeping it simple?
  1. If you did not do 1 and she did not do 2, what the hell is the point of actually posting their response here if it is this level of meaningless? To insult our collective intelligence, these smug No 10 residents and Arseborne are more than enough.
  1. Does it look like a Royal insult to you that a counter post by a head teacher has been posted alongside a post that looks like a space filling exercise? Trust me on this one: my old uni advisors would have thrown me out of my project had I managed to actually give them a summary of my project like the one you regurgitated from her office. (Which brings me to think, can I apply for some of the jobs at the MNHQs because I really feel like far more qualifiers than lots of your reviewers or whoever they are. 😝🤔) See, your problems with space bar etc are the least of my worries today.

And last but not the least,

  1. Since you have been pointed in the right direction now (sorry for sounding this patronising but yeah), would you officially demand a data set to go with her original post now or will we all move on happily to other greater good and national emergency related issues this afternoon together instead of removing her response as it is pure faceless propaganda?

Thanks.
But still waiting for removal of the guest post from someone who does not deserve to be there.