Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
GingerIvy · 19/03/2016 19:19

That bothers me too. Why are they deleted?

lljkk · 19/03/2016 19:29

Personal attacks, I didn't read 'em so dunno how bad.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 19:33

Michael Gove posted personal attacks on MN? Confused

Ambroxide · 19/03/2016 19:41

WTF?

That can't be right. The posts say withdrawn, not deleted.

lljkk · 19/03/2016 19:41

hahah, no the posters above (foxsake, 2 socks, Shatners, etc) who got deleted were being too harsh, I guess.

Where is the thread on MN where MGove posts all got deleted?

GooseberryRoolz · 19/03/2016 19:42

I doubt an MP guest poster would be subject to usual moderation rules even if he did launch into a volley of PAs.

Can anyone summarise the Gove debacle please? I am confused.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 19:46

Oh, the posts on this thread that got deleted! I saw them - they were personal attacks on Nicky Morgan; quite nasty ones, too.

Just because people feel strongly about how a government policy will affect them doesn't mean it's open season on politicians personally. They are doing a job. I appreciate that they don't do themselves any favours by conducting themselves the way the do in parliament, but thats not an excuse.

Greengager · 19/03/2016 19:47

What a lot of misleading rubbish. I'm so angry. It's about as convincing as when you put 'doctors back in charge of the nhs' you are selling off national assets and turning the population into units of production to enrich corporations. Disgusting

prettybird · 19/03/2016 19:58

The link to Gove's own webchat is a few posts below. Heaven knows why his contributions gave been withdrawn Confused

ShatnersBassoon · 19/03/2016 19:58

Yes, I suppose mine was a personal attack, but nothing I wouldn't say in real life, even after giving it some thought.

If politicians do and say ridiculous things when they're toeing the party line, they're clearly lacking in independent thought and deserve to be criticised for that.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 20:09

If politicians do and say ridiculous things when they're toeing the party line, they're clearly lacking in independent thought and deserve to be criticised for that

That's their job, shatners - no different from the sales pitches that cold callers read to me from impersonal call centres.
Not even MP's (even cabinet members) agree with everything their party stands for - but in order to hold the positions they do, they have to to the party line or quit. Both of which we've seen this week!

Criticise the policy, argue the point, but don't attack the representative.

Devilishpyjamas · 19/03/2016 20:14

They really do twist the truth though. Eg Nicky Morgan on QT this week said something about the tories increasing support for the disabled by granting do many thousands of new PIPs this year. Er that would be because people are being switched to PIPs from DLA!!!! That can only be described as deceitful really. If an advertiser twisted facts like that we could complain to advertising standards.

Devilishpyjamas · 19/03/2016 20:18

And yes, MNHQ why were Gove's responses deleted?

Ambroxide · 19/03/2016 20:20

Where is the thread on MN where MGove posts all got deleted?

Here: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/mumsnet_live_events/953781-Michael-Gove-Conservative-Shadow-Schools-and-Families-Minister-live-on

BeautifulMaudOHara · 19/03/2016 20:23

Why were Gove's posts deleted?

Ambroxide · 19/03/2016 20:27

I can only assume that he said things (lots of them judging by the numbers of deletions) that have since become plainly complete lies.

mabel123bells · 19/03/2016 20:29

As a teacher, I feel that I must comment on the notion that forcing all schools to become academies is the way to improve our education system.
Firstly, all schools are simply not the same. There is no "one size fits all" solution. Secondly, why doesn't anyone ask the teachers what would work for our children? The simple answer is that teachers are no longer seen as professionals who care for the children in their care, we are merely penpushers who spend all our time filingl in forms that nobody ever looks at. Thirdly, please could all political parties leave things alone long enough for us to get used to the changes before starting yet another new idea, with all the confusion that accompanies that?
Two years ago, my school was offered the chance to become an academy. We thought long and hard about it, and held many discussions with staff and parent representatives before deciding unanimously that academisation was not for us. Guess what? Now we have no choice. Whatever happened to democracy....?

GingerIvy · 19/03/2016 20:40

I'm not going to pretend to know the whole ins and outs of teacher qualifications, but how is it possible for a headteacher to be the one to decide whether or a not a teacher is ultimately qualified (presuming that's the QTS that is being talked about)? If that achievement means a pay rise, then surely there will be some headteachers that will craftily delay this to keep them on lower pay. Or to put them in a position that if they don't do x, y, z, put in extra hours doing this or that, etc , then the won't get the qualification.

I'm baffled. Can someone explain how this can possibly work without teachers being utterly shafted?

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 20:50

Can someone explain how this can possibly work without teachers being utterly shafted?

In my experience, it would be the other way around - HT are keen to financially reward staff for the work they do, whereas the new performance management system requires there to be evidence, presented to governors, that the teacher has reached targets set for them.

My understanding of the White Paper is that while a school/HT will decide when a new teacher is ready to be assessed and to "qualify", this will be ratified by an independent HT from a high performing and/or teaching school. I imagine there will be moderation arrangements etc, too.

SusanAndBinkyRideForth · 19/03/2016 20:51

It won't. As it is teachers are majorly shafted in some schools with ridiculous unachievable performance management targets to "manage" out expensive teachers, or just stop pay rises.

SusanAndBinkyRideForth · 19/03/2016 20:53

Ha! Hilarious x post there!

It must be lovely living in your world Pretty

GingerIvy · 19/03/2016 21:08

It just seems ripe for abuse. It seems all the money and all the power in the school is sitting right at the headteacher's desk, and everyone else is floundering below. A poor or unscrupulous headteacher and it would be a nightmare situation. I've known some good headteachers, but I've known a few that should never have been put in that position.

mistybrouhaha · 19/03/2016 21:10

RANT: heartbreaking and devastating stuff for our education system. Schools should not be privatised forcefully, and how on earth can she justify having no parent governors? How is this a good thing?
Also the ebacc is a big worry: i think some might believe it to be an actual qualification that is in some way useful to children. It isn't - its a way of measuring schools based on the fallacy that these subjects are somehow more valuable. But because of it being a performance measure, schools are prioritising these subjects at the expense of valuable, rigorous subjects like the arts and design technology. These subjects are disappearing from schools slowly as their resources are reduced.

The idea of the ebacc came from a report into 'facilitating subjects' by Russell Group universities - however even these universities are saying that the ebacc is too restrictive. It is fast becoming the case that those who are privately educated have access to high quality performance and arts facilities - but state schools cannot afford to fund these subjects properly and increasingly do not have cause to.
Bloody tories. Please sign the petition.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 21:14

It seems all the money and all the power in the school is sitting right at the headteacher's desk,

Not at all. Currently, it sits with the Gov Board, who can delegate a certain amount to the HT, and in Academies it sits with the Trust Board who can delegate it to the G Board, and down to the HT.

I do have concerns about stand-alone academies where the HT is a Trust Board member, but if the predictions of this thread are correct, the HT will be answering to a faceless corporate board and won't have a role in the strategic or business management of the school - instead they will focus on being the lead educational professional.
My expectation is that it will be somewhere in the middle.

Finola1step · 19/03/2016 21:14

Yes Pretty this would be a good plan. But the reality is that unqualified teachers will have a prolonged period having to prove themselves worthy of accredited status. While teaching more and more children for years and years.

The current system of the NQT induction year already enables Headteachers to be the ones who decide if an NQT successfully completes their full induction and thus gains full QTS. The difference is that for the vast majority, this is completed in a year. Not the ongoing saga of an unqualified teacher going year after year being paid the lowest (unqualified) salary.

I have worked with some incredible NQTs who work extremely hard to gain their degrees, BEds, PGCEs and then the NQT year. If a teacher can't prove after all the training and the NQT year that they are competent teachers, then by in large the classroom is not for them.

This is all a cynical plan to manipulate the teacher shortage crisis. I would be happy for my dc to be taught by NQTs. But under the current system. And certainly not for the whole of their school careers which I fear could become more frequent in the coming years.

Years ago, someone once said to me "A school is only as good as its NQT". Meaning that you can tell an awful lot about a school by looking at how well supported the NQT is. Looking at their progress over time.

But what happens when there are no experienced teachers to support the NQTs? Let alone the fully Unqualifieds?