Interesting - thanks!
For perspective - I asked why this wasn’t picked up in the AI overview and this was the response;
The PHE report is obscure and old. The key source the patient.info article cites is a 2016 Public Health England risk assessment document. That’s a fairly niche government report that doesn’t get widely indexed or cited in general health information.
It’s a “novel variant” — not classic PUUV. The Cheshire rodent finding was described as a related virus, not confirmed PUUV itself. So searches for “Puumala virus UK” or “European hantavirus UK” might not surface it, because technically it hasn’t been formally classified as the same strain.
Human cases are so mild they’re rarely diagnosed. Because most UK infections are thought to be subclinical or mistaken for flu/mild kidney issues, there’s almost no clinical literature on confirmed UK human cases of the European variant. That means very little to find.
Search results prioritise the dramatic. Most hantavirus coverage focuses on the deadly American HPS strain (40-50% mortality) — that’s the newsworthy version. The mild European HFRS barely registers by comparison.
The SEOV (Seoul virus) cases get more attention. The UK cases that have been documented and written up involve Seoul virus from pet rats — that’s the strain with hospitalised cases in Wales, Yorkshire and Scotland mentioned in the article. That tends to dominate UK-specific results.
So it’s not that the information doesn’t exist — it’s just buried in a single 2016 PHE report that most sources, including me in previous conversations, apparently haven’t surfaced.