The user did read the 40 page AI generated pdf.
My results were not estimated and suggested bad sugar control and good fat clearance. My diet advice was: lots of veg, nuts, whole grains, moderate fruit, low meat (but chicken breast and salmon okay), limited UPF and sugar. Extra virgin olive oil is excellent.
In other words, my personalised advice was the Mediterranean diet. Just like every one else. Sure Zoe may recommend sweet potatoes and blueberries 1 or 3x a week. The personalisation is in the middle where it probably matters very little.
And then I got a Libre 2 and found that my Zoe scores for “excellent blood sugar” didn’t predict my glucose responses. I was following their advice and eating meals that scored 98 and was getting blood spikes +4/5. Several days in a row. In multiple conditions. The personalisation was wrong (barely flakes were the culprit if you are wondering).
There is no evidence that Zoe will give you better outcomes than the Mediterranean diet and there never will be because Zoe is a Mediterranean diet brilliantly repackaged as cutting edge science. It is a scam, dressed up as science.
There are true believers. They forgive the clunky app, the terrible comms, and the contradictory advice because they are “contributing to science”. For some people it is framed in a way that gets them eating a Mediterranean diet and they lose weight.
This is the latest version of the diet industry dressed up as nutrition science. It’s expensive.